Effective Schools: Teacher Hiring, Assignment, Development, and Retention

The literature on effective schools emphasizes the importance of a quality teaching force in improving educational outcomes for students. In this article we use value-added methods to examine the relationship between a school's effectiveness and the recruitment, assignment, development, and retention of its teachers. Our results reveal four key findings. First, we find that more effective schools are able to attract and hire more effective teachers from other schools when vacancies arise. Second, more effective schools assign novice teachers to students in a more equitable fashion. Third, teachers who work in schools that were more effective at raising achievement in a prior period improve more rapidly in a subsequent period than do those in less effective schools. Finally, we find that more effective schools are better able to retain higher-quality teachers. The results point to the importance of personnel and, perhaps, school personnel practices for improving student outcomes.

[1]  E. Hanushek,et al.  Teachers, Schools, and Academic Achievement , 1998 .

[2]  Robert C. Pianta,et al.  The Classroom Assessment Scoring System: Findings from the Prekindergarten Year , 2004, The Elementary School Journal.

[3]  S. Loeb,et al.  Principal's Time Use and School Effectiveness , 2010, American Journal of Education.

[4]  Robert Gordon,et al.  Identifying Effective Teachers Using Performance on the Job. Discussion Paper 2006-01. , 2006 .

[5]  B. Hamre,et al.  Classroom assessment scoring system. , 2008 .

[6]  Marshall S. Smith,et al.  Effective Schools: A Review , 1983, The Elementary School Journal.

[7]  J. Coleman,et al.  Equality And Achievement In Education , 1993 .

[8]  Helen F. Ladd,et al.  Teacher-Student Matching and the Assessment of Teacher Effectiveness , 2006, The Journal of Human Resources.

[9]  John F. Kain,et al.  The Market for Teacher Quality. NBER Working Paper No. 11154. , 2005 .

[10]  Jonah E. Rockoff The Impact of Individual Teachers on Student Achievement: Evidence from Panel Data , 2004 .

[11]  Robert H. Meyer,et al.  Value-added indicators of school performance: A primer , 1997 .

[12]  P. Sammons Key Characteristics of Effective Schools: a Review of School Effectiveness Research , 1997 .

[13]  Li Feng Hire Today, Gone Tomorrow: New Teacher Classroom Assignments and Teacher Mobility , 2010, Education Finance and Policy.

[14]  S. Loeb,et al.  Measure for Measure: The Relationship between Measures of Instructional Practice in Middle School English Language Arts and Teachers' Value-Added Scores. Working Paper 45. , 2010 .

[15]  Stephen Raudenbush,et al.  A longitudinal hierarchical linear models for estimating school e?ects and their stability , 1989 .

[16]  Brian A. Jacob,et al.  Can Principals Identify Effective Teachers? Evidence on Subjective Performance Evaluation in Education , 2008, Journal of Labor Economics.

[17]  Matthew M. Chingos,et al.  Teacher Effectiveness, Mobility, and Attrition in Florida: A descriptive analysis , 2008 .

[18]  Beckett A. Broh,et al.  Are Schools the Great Equalizer? Cognitive Inequality during the Summer Months and the School Year , 2004 .

[19]  Todd R. Stinebrickner,et al.  Race, Poverty, and Teacher Mobility , 2005 .

[20]  Susanna Loeb,et al.  Teacher Sorting and the Plight of Urban Schools: A Descriptive Analysis , 2002 .

[21]  Daniel F. McCaffrey,et al.  The Intertemporal Variability of Teacher Effect Estimates , 2009, Education Finance and Policy.

[22]  Examining Teacher Turnover: The Role of School Leadership , 2009 .

[23]  Brian A. Jacob,et al.  Can You Recognize an Effective Teacher when You Recruit One , 2011 .

[24]  Jason A. Grissom,et al.  Triangulating Principal Effectiveness , 2011 .

[25]  Priscilla Wohlstetter,et al.  Decentralizing Dollars Under School-Based Management: Have Policies Changed? , 1992 .

[26]  Melinda Scott Krei Intensifying the Barriers: The Problem of Inequitable Teacher Allocation in Low-Income Urban Schools , 1998 .

[27]  William,et al.  Cumulative and Residual Effects of Teachers on Future Student Academic Achievement , 1999 .

[28]  Ronald F. Ferguson Can schools narrow the Black–White test score gap? , 1998 .

[29]  L. Hedges,et al.  How Large Are Teacher Effects? , 2004 .

[30]  H. Chandler Effective Schools , 1984, Journal of learning disabilities.

[31]  Lars Lefgren,et al.  Principals as Agents: Subjective Performance Measurement in Education , 2005 .

[32]  A. Mood,et al.  Equality of Educational Opportunity. , 1967 .

[33]  Susanna Loeb,et al.  The Draw of Home: How Teachers&Apos; Preferences for Proximity Disadvantage Urban Schools , 2003 .

[34]  Dan Goldhaber,et al.  Are Public Schools Really Losing Their Best? Assessing the Career Transitions of Teachers and Their Implications for the Quality of the Teacher Workforce. Working Paper 12. , 2007 .

[35]  Demetra Kalogrides,et al.  Power play? Teacher characteristics and class assignments. , 2011 .

[36]  S. Loeb,et al.  Who Leaves? Teacher Attrition and Student Achievement. NBER Working Paper No. 14022. , 2008 .

[37]  Donald B. Rubin,et al.  A Potential Outcomes View of Value-Added Assessment in Education , 2004 .

[38]  S. Loeb,et al.  The Role of Teacher Quality in Retention and Hiring: Using Applications-to-Transfer to Uncover Preferences of Teachers and Schools , 2010 .

[39]  Susanna Loeb,et al.  Who Leaves? Teacher Attrition and Student Achievement , 2008 .

[40]  Jesse Rothstein,et al.  Student Sorting and Bias in Value-Added Estimation: Selection on Observables and Unobservables , 2009, Education Finance and Policy.

[41]  Jonah E. Rockoff,et al.  What does certification tell us about teacher effectiveness? Evidence from New York City , 2008 .

[42]  Jason A. Grissom,et al.  Triangulating Principal Effectiveness: How Perspectives of Parents, Teachers, and Assistant Principals Identify the Central Importance of Managerial Skills. Working Paper 35. , 2009 .

[43]  A. Mood,et al.  Equality of Educational Opportunity. , 1967 .