Issues in the sustainability of products designed for multi-lifecycle

Design for multi-lifecycle (DFML) is a sustainable design approach that seeks to maximize the utility of resources used in developing a product by incorporating features that enable the elongation of the techno-economic service life of that product at the design stage. The goal of DFML is “indefinite” use of the resources invested/embodied in a product without compromising its economic value, technological soundness and socio-cultural acceptability. However, there is a limit to how many times a product designed for multi-lifecycle can be cycled. The aim of this research is to identify issues affecting how many times products designed for multi-lifecycle could be cycled. Another goal of this study is to articulate how the understanding of these issues can be utilized in improving product design for multi-lifecycle. This study is based on intensive literature survey and on over twenty years’ experience in conventionaland in sustainable design and development of agri-food machinery. From the study we learned that the sustainability of products and equipment designed for multi-lifecycle depends, among other things, on the durability of the core components, the required performance standard, resource consumption tipping point, economic advantage eradication point, changes in consumer taste, and regulatory changes. It means that the number of times that resources invested in a product designed for multi-lifecycles can be cycled is increasable by improving the durability of the structure and core components of the product. It also means that designers would be able to improve the sustainability of machinery designed for multilifecycles by incorporating features that facilitate easy reconfiguration and upgrading of the product at reasonable cost as consumer taste and regulations changes.

[1]  George W. Woodruff,et al.  Incorporating Environmental Issues in Product Design and Realization , 1999 .

[2]  Design for Multi-Lifecycle and Its Role in Enhancing Environmental Protection in the Agri-Industrial Sector Israel , 2013 .

[3]  Zhu Shao-hua Analysis of Engine Remanufacturing and Benefits Based on Equipment Multi-lifecycle Theory , 2006 .

[4]  Israel Dunmade Design for Multi-lifecycle: A sustainable design concept applied to an agroindustrial development project , 2006 .

[5]  A. Brent,et al.  Sustainable life cycle management: indicators to assess the sustainability of engineering projects and technologies , 2004, 2004 IEEE International Engineering Management Conference (IEEE Cat. No.04CH37574).

[6]  Julius D. Golovatchev,et al.  Integrated PLM-process-approach for the development and management of telecommunications products in a multi-lifecycle environment , 2010, Int. J. Manuf. Technol. Manag..

[7]  Reggie J. Caudill,et al.  Multi-lifecycle design strategies: applications in plastics for durable goods , 1996 .

[8]  Israel Dunmade,et al.  Indicators of sustainability: assessing the suitability of a foreign technology for a developing economy , 2002 .

[9]  Sanchoy K. Das,et al.  Use of snap-fit fasteners in the multi-life-cycle design of products , 1999, Proceedings of the 1999 IEEE International Symposium on Electronics and the Environment (Cat. No.99CH36357).

[10]  MengChu Zhou,et al.  MULTI-LIFECYCLE PRODUCT RECOVERY FOR ELECTRONIC PRODUCTS , 1999 .

[11]  MengChu Zhou,et al.  Multi-lifecycle product and process development: selection of optimal production, usage, and recovery processes , 1999, Proceedings of the 1999 IEEE International Symposium on Electronics and the Environment (Cat. No.99CH36357).

[12]  张哉根,et al.  Leu-M , 1991 .

[13]  Israel Dunmade,et al.  Designing for multi-lifecycle to promote industrial ecology philosophy , 2006, SPIE Optics East.

[14]  B. Kopacek,et al.  Case study: multi life cycle center [waste electric and electronic equipment recycling] , 2004, IEEE International Symposium on Electronics and the Environment, 2004. Conference Record. 2004.