The role of interactions in hypothesis testing of ecological scenarios with process models

Hypothesis testing is widely employed for comparing the effect of treatments in field and laboratory experiments. Although comparison of scenarios through process models is also an important aspect in ecological simulation, studies conducted in that area usually do not account for the uncertainty (estimation error) associated with the simulation results. This paper proposes an approach for testing hypotheses through process models accounting for estimation error in values of treatment entities (model factors that characterize the treatments or scenarios) and external entities (remaining model factors) that interact with treatment entities. External entities, as represented by the model, may in turn be thought of as a characterization of the environment in which the simulation experiment is conducted. This approach is a generalization of a previous work developed under the assumption that no external entity interacts with treatment entities. This method focuses on differences between predictions obtained from the treatments, rather than on absolute values predicted for each treatment. Fitting low-order orthogonal polynomials is suggested as a means to identify entity interactions in process models. An example is conducted to indirectly test the effect of tree spacing (through its inverse effect on wood density in some species) on the growth of a forest stand. Specifically, we employed a forest growth process model to test whether the growth of basal area is affected by different wood densities resulting from two initial spacings (3 and 6 m) in a red pine (Pinus resinosa Ait.) stand growing in the Great Lakes region of North America from ages 36 to 60 years. Results of the effect of spacing on wood density were in turn obtained from a field study. The importance of accounting for uncertainty in interacting external entities became evident as the variance of the mean difference between predicted treatment means was six times larger when that source of uncertainty was accounted for. Although basal area for the wider spacing was significantly larger in both tests, the power of the tests was affected considerably by the different levels of uncertainty resulting from these two approaches.

[1]  Harry T. Valentine,et al.  A Carbon-balance Model of Stand Growth: a Derivation Employing Pipe-model Theory and the Self-thinning Rule , 1988 .

[2]  Roderick C. Dewar,et al.  Sustainable forestry: A model of the effects of nitrogen removals in wood harvesting and fire on the nitrogen balance of regrowth eucalypt stands , 1997 .

[3]  P. J. Green,et al.  Probability and Statistical Inference , 1978 .

[4]  Hugh P. Possingham,et al.  Modelling the reintroduction of the greater bilby Macrotis lagotis using the metapopulation model Analysis of the Likelihood of Extinction (ALEX) , 1995 .

[5]  B. J. Winer.  Statistical Principles in Experimental Design , 1992 .

[6]  R. Mead,et al.  Statistical Methods in Agriculture and Experimental Biology , 1994 .

[7]  T. Kira,et al.  PRIMARY PRODUCTION AND TURNOVER OF ORGANIC MATTER IN DIFFERENT FOREST ECOSYSTEMS OF THE WESTERN PACIFIC , 1967 .

[8]  R. K. Dixon,et al.  Process modeling of forest growth responses to environmental stress , 1991 .

[9]  R. A. Fisher,et al.  Design of Experiments , 1936 .

[10]  Hartmut Bossel,et al.  treedyn3 forest simulation model , 1996 .

[11]  M. Deaton,et al.  Response Surfaces: Designs and Analyses , 1989 .

[12]  David B. Lindenmayer,et al.  A simulation study of the impacts of population subdivision on the mountain brushtail possum Trichosurus caninus Ogilby (Phalangeridae: Marsupialia), in south-eastern Australia. II. Loss of genetic variation within and between subpopulations , 1995 .

[13]  T. Kira,et al.  A QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS OF PLANT FORM-THE PIPE MODEL THEORY : II. FURTHER EVIDENCE OF THE THEORY AND ITS APPLICATION IN FOREST ECOLOGY , 1964 .

[14]  R. K. Dixon,et al.  Carbon Pools and Flux of Global Forest Ecosystems , 1994, Science.

[15]  J. E. Shottafer,et al.  Specific gravity and mechanical property-age relationships in red pine , 1992 .

[16]  Prof. Dr. Bruce J. Zobel,et al.  Genetics of Wood Production , 1995, Springer Series in Wood Science.

[17]  Bruce J. Zobel,et al.  Wood Variation: Its Causes and Control , 1989 .

[18]  G. Larocque,et al.  Wood relative density development in red pine (Pinus resinosa Ait.) stands as affected by different initial spacings , 1995 .

[19]  Daniel Auclair,et al.  Plantation Silviculture in Europe , 1997 .

[20]  D. Lindenmayer,et al.  A simulation study of the impacts of population subdivision on the mountain brushtail possum Trichosurus caninus Ogilby (Phalangeridae: Marsupialia) in south-eastern Australia. I. Demographic stability and population persistence , 1995 .

[21]  W. Palz,et al.  Biomass forestry in Europe :a strategy for the future , 1988 .

[22]  Ralph D. Nyland,et al.  Silviculture: Concepts and Applications , 1996 .

[23]  T. W. Daniel,et al.  The Practice of Silviculture , 1936 .

[24]  J. Etherington,et al.  Physiological Plant Ecology. , 1977 .

[25]  Resource physiology of conifers: by W.K. Smith and T.M. Hinckley (Editors), Academic Press, San Diego, 1995, 396 pp., US$74.95, ISBN 0-12-652870-5 , 1996 .

[26]  R. H. Myers,et al.  Response Surface Methodology: Process and Product Optimization Using Designed Experiments , 1995 .

[27]  Gregory J. Davis,et al.  The demographic significance of ‘sink’ populations , 1991 .

[28]  D. L. Scarnecchia,et al.  Fundamentals of Ecological Modelling , 1995 .

[29]  T. Kira,et al.  A QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS OF PLANT FORM-THE PIPE MODEL THEORY : I.BASIC ANALYSES , 1964 .

[30]  Biing T. Guan,et al.  Projection variance partitioning of a conceptual forest growth model with orthogonal polynomials , 1996 .

[31]  George Z. Gertner,et al.  Virtual experimentation: conceptual models and hypothesis testing of ecological scenarios , 1997 .

[32]  H. Massie,et al.  History of British Space Science: The scientific background , 1986 .

[33]  Herman H. Shugart,et al.  The sensitivity of some high-latitude boreal forests to climatic parameters , 1990 .

[34]  G. C. Tiao,et al.  Bayesian inference in statistical analysis , 1973 .

[35]  J. H. M. Thornley,et al.  Mathematical models in plant physiology , 1976 .

[36]  Wade K. Smith,et al.  The Ecophysiology of Coniferous Forests , 1995 .

[37]  S. Gower,et al.  Carbon allocation and accumulation in conifers , 1995 .

[38]  Philip M. Fearnside,et al.  WOOD DENSITY FOR ESTIMATING FOREST BIOMASS IN BRAZILIAN AMAZONIA , 1997 .

[39]  William G. Cochran,et al.  Experimental Designs, 2nd Edition , 1950 .

[40]  Jessica Gurevitch,et al.  Design and Analysis of Ecological Experiments , 1993 .