Continuous improvement strategies for environmental risk mitigation in chemical plants

Abstract Environmental risk management for chemical plants requires appropriate data resources and decision-making methods. To mitigate environmental risks in industrial operations, technologies and measures should be evaluated based on cost, health, and ecosystem considerations. This work develops an integrated framework for implementing continuous improvements strategies for environmental risk mitigation in chemical plants. First, we establish a general and hierarchical indicator system to identify the risks which come from inherent process safety and operations management, chemicals storage, and transportation. Next, we propose a qualitative analysis method for identifying risk points that could potentially result in health and environmental problems. Then, we quantitatively analyze the risk points by using the best–worst method (BWM), which enables the users to obtain the criticality of each risk point. Countermeasures to mitigate environmental risks can thus be evaluated and prioritized based on their costs and implementation durations. Finally, we study a pharmaceutical intermediate plant to demonstrate the feasibility of the proposed framework. Considering the funds and countermeasure costs, this method can help decision makers determine the best countermeasures to mitigate the environmental risks of any industrial plant.

[1]  Jingzheng Ren,et al.  Selection of sustainable prime mover for combined cooling, heat, and power technologies under uncertainties: An interval multicriteria decision‐making approach , 2018 .

[2]  Denny K. S. Ng,et al.  Pinch analysis-based approach to industrial safety risk and environmental management , 2016, Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy.

[3]  Javed Malek,et al.  Prioritization of sustainable manufacturing barriers using Best Worst Method , 2019, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[4]  J. Rezaei Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method , 2015 .

[5]  Manuchehr Manteghi,et al.  Investigation and evaluation of key success factors in technological innovation development based on BWM , 2017 .

[6]  Himanshu Gupta,et al.  Developing a roadmap to overcome barriers to energy efficiency in buildings using best worst method , 2017 .

[7]  Alessio Ishizaka,et al.  A hybrid and integrated approach to evaluate and prevent disasters , 2014, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[8]  X. Jia,et al.  Environmental pollution liability insurance to promote environmental risk management in chemical industrial parks , 2020, Resources, Conservation and Recycling.

[9]  Sen Guo,et al.  Fuzzy best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method and its applications , 2017, Knowl. Based Syst..

[10]  Dedy Ng,et al.  An approach for risk reduction (methodology) based on optimizing the facility layout and siting in toxic gas release scenarios , 2010 .

[11]  Jafar Rezaei,et al.  Evaluating firms' R&D performance using best worst method. , 2018, Evaluation and program planning.

[12]  J. Rezaei,et al.  A supplier selection life cycle approach integrating traditional and environmental criteria using the best worst method , 2016 .

[13]  Jingzheng Ren,et al.  Urban sewage sludge, sustainability, and transition for Eco-City: Multi-criteria sustainability assessment of technologies based on best-worst method , 2017 .

[14]  Riyanarto Sarno,et al.  Vendor Track Record Selection Using Best Worst Method , 2018, 2018 International Seminar on Application for Technology of Information and Communication.

[15]  Jingzheng Ren,et al.  Energy performance contracting, risk factors, and policy implications: Identification and analysis of risks based on the best-worst network method , 2019, Energy.

[16]  Vincent Bakker,et al.  Circular chemistry to enable a circular economy , 2019, Nature Chemistry.

[17]  Jafar Rezaei,et al.  Bioethanol facility location selection using best-worst method , 2019, Applied Energy.

[18]  Raymond R. Tan,et al.  Segmented pinch analysis for environmental risk management , 2017 .

[19]  J. Rezaei Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method: Some properties and a linear model , 2016 .

[20]  J. Rezaei,et al.  Selection of biomass thermochemical conversion technology in the Netherlands: A best worst method approach , 2017 .

[21]  J. Rezaei,et al.  Assessing the social sustainability of supply chains using Best Worst Method , 2017 .

[22]  Frank W. Guldenmund,et al.  Safety management systems: A broad overview of the literature , 2018 .

[23]  Guangyin Xu,et al.  Polygeneration system and sustainability: Multi-attribute decision-support framework for comprehensive assessment under uncertainties , 2017 .

[24]  Helen H. Lou,et al.  Environmental impact assessment of different design schemes of an industrial ecosystem , 2007 .

[25]  S. Kaplan,et al.  On The Quantitative Definition of Risk , 1981 .

[26]  Jingzheng Ren,et al.  Technology selection for ballast water treatment by multi-stakeholders: A multi-attribute decision analysis approach based on the combined weights and extension theory. , 2018, Chemosphere.

[27]  Maria Francesca Milazzo,et al.  Using the ALARP principle for safety management in the energy production sector of chemical industry , 2018, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..