Sparse Representation of Group-Wise FMRI Signals

The human brain function involves complex processes with population codes of neuronal activities. Neuroscience research has demonstrated that when representing neuronal activities, sparsity is an important characterizing property. Inspired by this finding, significant amount of efforts from the scientific communities have been recently devoted to sparse representations of signals and patterns, and promising achievements have been made. However, sparse representation of fMRI signals, particularly at the population level of a group of different brains, has been rarely explored yet. In this paper, we present a novel group-wise sparse representation of task-based fMRI signals from multiple subjects via dictionary learning methods. Specifically, we extract and pool task-based fMRI signals for a set of cortical landmarks, each of which possesses intrinsic anatomical correspondence, from a group of subjects. Then an effective online dictionary learning algorithm is employed to learn an over-complete dictionary from the pooled population of fMRI signals based on optimally determined dictionary size. Our experiments have identified meaningful Atoms of Interests (AOI) in the learned dictionary, which correspond to consistent and meaningful functional responses of the brain to external stimulus. Our work demonstrated that sparse representation of group-wise fMRI signals is naturally suitable and effective in recovering population codes of neuronal signals conveyed in fMRI data.

[1]  Bruno A Olshausen,et al.  Sparse coding of sensory inputs , 2004, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[2]  Degang Zhang,et al.  Complex span tasks and hippocampal recruitment during working memory , 2011, NeuroImage.

[3]  L. Cronbach Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests , 1951 .

[4]  Stéphane Mallat,et al.  Matching pursuits with time-frequency dictionaries , 1993, IEEE Trans. Signal Process..

[5]  Guillermo Sapiro,et al.  Online Learning for Matrix Factorization and Sparse Coding , 2009, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[6]  Guillermo Sapiro,et al.  Sparse Representation for Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , 2010, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[7]  Xin Zhang,et al.  Characterization of Task-Free/Task-Performance Brain States , 2012, MICCAI.

[8]  Hervé Delingette,et al.  Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention – MICCAI 2012 , 2012, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[9]  C. Koch,et al.  Sparse but not ‘Grandmother-cell’ coding in the medial temporal lobe , 2008, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[10]  David J. Field,et al.  Emergence of simple-cell receptive field properties by learning a sparse code for natural images , 1996, Nature.

[11]  D. Shen,et al.  DICCCOL: dense individualized and common connectivity-based cortical landmarks. , 2013, Cerebral cortex.

[12]  I Daubechies,et al.  Independent component analysis for brain fMRI does not select for independence , 2009 .

[13]  Stephen M. Smith,et al.  General multilevel linear modeling for group analysis in FMRI , 2003, NeuroImage.

[14]  Sungho Tak,et al.  A Data-Driven Sparse GLM for fMRI Analysis Using Sparse Dictionary Learning With MDL Criterion , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.