Strategic framework for implementing smart devices in the construction industry

The decentralisation of information and high rate of mobile content access in the construction industry provide an ideal scenario for improvement of processes via the implementation of the paradigm of the Internet of Things (IoT). Smart devices are considered as the objects interconnected in the IoT; therefore, they play a fundamental role in the digital transformation of the construction industry. Currently, there is a lack of guidelines regarding the implementation of smart devices for digitalisation in the construction industry. Consequently, this paper aims to provide a set of guidelines for implementing smart devices in the construction industry.,An empirical study was performed in the UK and the Dominican Republic (DR). Following a systematic approach, qualitative data collection and analysis was performed based on semi-structured interviews involving professionals from construction companies in the UK and the DR. Interviews were recorded and subsequently transcribed using Microsoft Word and exported to the software NVivo, where the software was used to find common thematic nodes across all interviews.,The findings encompass drivers, challenges and critical success factors (CSFs) for implementing smart devices in construction project. For both countries, the top five CSFs were leadership, staff training, culture, technology awareness and cost of implementation. These findings were used to develop a strategic framework for implementing smart devices in construction companies. The framework establishes the actors, elements and actions to be considered by construction companies when implementing smart devices.,This paper provides a richer insight into the understanding and awareness of implementing smart devices. A strategic framework for implementing smart devices in the construction industry and providing guidelines for adopting smart devices in construction projects was developed and validated. This study provides a better understanding of the key factors to be considered by construction companies when embedding smart devices into their projects.

[1]  Marilyn Domas White,et al.  Content Analysis: A Flexible Methodology , 2006, Libr. Trends.

[2]  Peter E.D. Love,et al.  Evaluation of IT costs in construction , 2001 .

[3]  Andy Neely,et al.  Performance measurement system design , 1995 .

[4]  Rehan Sadiq,et al.  An overview of construction and demolition waste management in Canada: a lifecycle analysis approach to sustainability , 2013, Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy.

[5]  Suresh Renukappa,et al.  What is a smart device? - a conceptualisation within the paradigm of the internet of things , 2018 .

[6]  David Targett,et al.  IS evaluation: a process for bringing together benefits, costs and risks , 1999 .

[7]  Kire Trivodaliev,et al.  A review of Internet of Things for smart home: Challenges and solutions , 2017 .

[8]  Jeffrey P. Baker,et al.  The Technology–Organization–Environment Framework , 2012 .

[9]  Christer Karlsson,et al.  Change processes towards lean production , 1995 .

[10]  Suresh Renukappa,et al.  Utilisation of Smart Devices in the Construction Industry: An Empirical Study in the Dominican Republic , 2018, Int. J. 3 D Inf. Model..

[11]  Philip Powell,et al.  Information Technology Evaluation: Is It Different? , 1992 .

[12]  Massimo Franceschet,et al.  A comparison of bibliometric indicators for computer science scholars and journals on Web of Science and Google Scholar , 2010, Scientometrics.

[13]  David A. Nadler,et al.  Organizing for Innovation , 1986 .

[14]  Michel Lebas,et al.  Performance measurement and performance management , 1995 .

[15]  M. Mason.  Sample Size and Saturation in PhD Studies Using Qualitative Interviews , 2010 .

[16]  Andrew Baldwin,et al.  A Framework for Measuring IT Innovation Benefits , 2000, J. Inf. Technol. Constr..

[17]  K. Scarfone,et al.  Guidelines for Managing the Security of Mobile Devices in the Enterprise , 2013 .

[18]  Anuradha Mathrani,et al.  The Perceived Benefits of Apps by Construction Professionals in New Zealand , 2017 .

[19]  Naihua Duan,et al.  Purposeful Sampling for Qualitative Data Collection and Analysis in Mixed Method Implementation Research , 2015, Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research.

[20]  J. Morse,et al.  Situating and Constructing Diversity in Semi-Structured Interviews , 2015, Global qualitative nursing research.

[21]  Albert P.C. Chan,et al.  Key performance indicators for measuring construction success , 2004 .

[22]  Stephen L. Mueller,et al.  Entrepreneurial characteristics in Switzerland and the UK: A comparative study of techno-entrepreneurs , 2009 .

[23]  C. Caldas,et al.  Benchmarking Initiatives in the Construction Industry: Lessons Learned and Improvement Opportunities , 2006 .

[24]  Antonio Iera,et al.  The Internet of Things: A survey , 2010, Comput. Networks.

[25]  Zahir Irani,et al.  An exploratory study of information technology evaluation and benefits management practices of SMEs in the construction industry , 2004, Inf. Manag..

[26]  Zahir Irani,et al.  Transforming failure into success through organisational learning: an analysis of a manufacturing information system , 2001, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[27]  David Bregman,et al.  A Universal Implementation Model for the Smart Home , 2009 .