Natural Frequencies Help Older Adults and People with Low Numeracy to Evaluate Medical Screening Tests

Background. Understanding information about medical screening tests often requires estimating positive predictive values (i.e., posterior probabilities), which is a notoriously difficult task. Previous studies have shown that representation of information in terms of natural frequencies (i.e., counts of occurrences that preserve base rates) facilitates judgments of positive predictive values. The objective of this study was to investigate whether natural frequencies facilitate accurate estimates in elderly people and whether performance depends on numeracy skills. Elderly people are more often than younger people required to use such information to make informed choices regarding medical procedures (e.g., screenings). Method. This was an experimental study in which information about 2 medical screening tests was presented either as conditional probabilities or natural frequencies. Participants were 47 older adults (62—77 years of age; average numeracy score 8.6) and 115 younger adults (18—35 years of age; average numeracy score 10.3). Results. When the screening information was presented in terms of conditional probabilities, only 15% of the younger adults and 18% of the older adults provided accurate estimates in at least 1 of the tasks. When information was presented in terms of natural frequencies, 55% of the younger adults and 58% of the elderly participants gave correct estimates. This effect occurred without explicit training. Furthermore, participants with higher numeracy scores performed better in the estimation tasks than those with lower numeracy scores. Conclusions. Natural frequencies help elderly and young patients—including those with lower numeracy skills—to understand positive predictive values of medical screening tests.

[1]  Wolfgang Prinz,et al.  Transformations in the Couplings Among Intellectual Abilities and Constituent Cognitive Processes Across the Life Span , 2004, Psychological science.

[2]  Lisa M. Schwartz,et al.  The Role of Numeracy in Understanding the Benefit of Screening Mammography , 1997, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[3]  A. Tversky,et al.  Subjective Probability: A Judgment of Representativeness , 1972 .

[4]  Lisa M. Schwartz,et al.  PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST Helping Doctors and Patients Make Sense of Health Statistics , 2022 .

[5]  Gerd Gigerenzer,et al.  Communicating Statistical Information , 2000, Science.

[6]  Gerd Gigerenzer,et al.  How to improve the diagnostic inferences of medical experts , 2004 .

[7]  Amanda L Golbeck,et al.  A definition and operational framework for health numeracy. , 2005, American journal of preventive medicine.

[8]  Gerd Gigerenzer,et al.  Children can solve Bayesian problems: the role of representation in mental computation , 2006, Cognition.

[9]  B. Rimer,et al.  General Performance on a Numeracy Scale among Highly Educated Samples , 2001, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[10]  L. Cosmides,et al.  Are humans good intuitive statisticians after all? Rethinking some conclusions from the literature on judgment under uncertainty , 1996, Cognition.

[11]  Gerd Gigerenzer,et al.  How to Improve Bayesian Reasoning Without Instruction: Frequency Formats , 1995 .

[12]  G Gigerenzer,et al.  Using natural frequencies to improve diagnostic inferences , 1998, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[13]  C. K. Mertz,et al.  PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE Research Article Numeracy and Decision Making , 2022 .