Remote Ischemic Preconditioning and Outcomes of Cardiac Surgery.

BACKGROUND Whether remote ischemic preconditioning (transient ischemia and reperfusion of the arm) can improve clinical outcomes in patients undergoing coronary-artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery is not known. We investigated this question in a randomized trial. METHODS We conducted a multicenter, sham-controlled trial involving adults at increased surgical risk who were undergoing on-pump CABG (with or without valve surgery) with blood cardioplegia. After anesthesia induction and before surgical incision, patients were randomly assigned to remote ischemic preconditioning (four 5-minute inflations and deflations of a standard blood-pressure cuff on the upper arm) or sham conditioning (control group). Anesthetic management and perioperative care were not standardized. The combined primary end point was death from cardiovascular causes, nonfatal myocardial infarction, coronary revascularization, or stroke, assessed 12 months after randomization. RESULTS We enrolled a total of 1612 patients (811 in the control group and 801 in the ischemic-preconditioning group) at 30 cardiac surgery centers in the United Kingdom. There was no significant difference in the cumulative incidence of the primary end point at 12 months between the patients in the remote ischemic preconditioning group and those in the control group (212 patients [26.5%] and 225 patients [27.7%], respectively; hazard ratio with ischemic preconditioning, 0.95; 95% confidence interval, 0.79 to 1.15; P=0.58). Furthermore, there were no significant between-group differences in either adverse events or the secondary end points of perioperative myocardial injury (assessed on the basis of the area under the curve for the high-sensitivity assay of serum troponin T at 72 hours), inotrope score (calculated from the maximum dose of the individual inotropic agents administered in the first 3 days after surgery), acute kidney injury, duration of stay in the intensive care unit and hospital, distance on the 6-minute walk test, and quality of life. CONCLUSIONS Remote ischemic preconditioning did not improve clinical outcomes in patients undergoing elective on-pump CABG with or without valve surgery. (Funded by the Efficacy and Mechanism Evaluation Program [a Medical Research Council and National Institute of Health Research partnership] and the British Heart Foundation; ERICCA ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01247545.).

[1]  K. Garratt,et al.  Remote Ischemic Conditioning , 2017, Journal of cardiovascular pharmacology and therapeutics.

[2]  J. Andreasen,et al.  Age-dependent trends in postoperative mortality and preoperative comorbidity in isolated coronary artery bypass surgery: a nationwide study. , 2016, European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery.

[3]  AnweshanSamanta,et al.  Remote Ischemic Preconditioning for Cardiac Surgery , 2016 .

[4]  D. Hausenloy,et al.  Remote ischaemic conditioning: cardiac protection from afar , 2015, Anaesthesia.

[5]  M. Hayward,et al.  Effect of remote ischaemic preconditioning on clinical outcomes in patients undergoing cardiac bypass surgery: a randomised controlled clinical trial , 2014, Heart.

[6]  B. Bein,et al.  Remote preconditioning and major clinical complications following adult cardiovascular surgery: systematic review and meta-analysis. , 2014, International journal of cardiology.

[7]  B. McCrindle,et al.  Remote Ischemic Preconditioning in Children Undergoing Cardiac Surgery With Cardiopulmonary Bypass: A Single‐Center Double‐Blinded Randomized Trial , 2014, Journal of the American Heart Association.

[8]  M. Galagudza,et al.  [Effects of remote ischemic preconditioning on perioperative period in elective aortic valve replacement]. , 2014, Anesteziologiia i reanimatologiia.

[9]  J. DiNicolantonio,et al.  Cardiac remote ischaemic preconditioning reduces periprocedural myocardial infarction for patients undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions: a meta-analysis of randomised clinical trials. , 2014, EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[10]  Qiang Zhao,et al.  Remote ischemic preconditioning does not improve the clinical outcomes in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. , 2014, International journal of cardiology.

[11]  Y. Jeon,et al.  Does remote ischaemic preconditioning with postconditioning improve clinical outcomes of patients undergoing cardiac surgery? Remote Ischaemic Preconditioning with Postconditioning Outcome Trial. , 2014, European heart journal.

[12]  G. Heusch,et al.  Interference of propofol with signal transducer and activator of transcription 5 activation and cardioprotection by remote ischemic preconditioning during coronary artery bypass grafting. , 2014, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[13]  M. Neuhäuser,et al.  Cardioprotective and prognostic effects of remote ischaemic preconditioning in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery: a single-centre randomised, double-blind, controlled trial , 2013, The Lancet.

[14]  J. Kellum,et al.  Diagnosis, evaluation, and management of acute kidney injury: a KDIGO summary (Part 1) , 2013, Critical Care.

[15]  G. Heusch Cardioprotection: chances and challenges of its translation to the clinic , 2013, The Lancet.

[16]  F. Gaita,et al.  Remote ischaemic preconditioning in coronary artery bypass surgery: a meta-analysis , 2012, Heart.

[17]  E. Lucchinetti,et al.  Remote Ischemic Preconditioning Applied during Isoflurane Inhalation Provides No Benefit to the Myocardium of Patients Undergoing On-pump Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery: Lack of Synergy or Evidence of Antagonism in Cardioprotection? , 2012, Anesthesiology.

[18]  G. Heusch,et al.  Protection by remote ischemic preconditioning during coronary artery bypass graft surgery with isoflurane but not propofol – a clinical trial , 2012, Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica.

[19]  G. Gravlee Protection by remote ischemic preconditioning during coronary artery bypass graft surgery with isoflurane but not propofol – a clinical trial , 2012 .

[20]  J. Pepper,et al.  Effect of remote ischemic preconditioning on clinical outcomes in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery (ERICCA): rationale and study design of a multi-centre randomized double-blinded controlled clinical trial , 2012, Clinical Research in Cardiology.

[21]  A. Shah,et al.  Remote intermittent ischemia before coronary artery bypass graft surgery: a strategy to reduce injury and inflammation? , 2011, Basic Research in Cardiology.

[22]  M. Frenneaux,et al.  Response to Letter Regarding Article, “Remote Ischemic Preconditioning in Human Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery: From Promise to Disappointment?” , 2011 .

[23]  G. Heusch,et al.  Remote ischemic preconditioning reduces myocardial injury after coronary artery bypass surgery with crystalloid cardioplegic arrest , 2010, Basic Research in Cardiology.

[24]  Antonio Colombo,et al.  Percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary-artery bypass grafting for severe coronary artery disease. , 2009, The New England journal of medicine.

[25]  D. Yellon,et al.  Remote ischaemic preconditioning reduces myocardial injury in patients undergoing cardiac surgery with cold-blood cardioplegia: a randomised controlled trial , 2009, Heart.

[26]  D. Yellon,et al.  Remote ischaemic preconditioning: underlying mechanisms and clinical application. , 2008, Cardiovascular research.

[27]  B. Gersh Effect of remote ischaemic preconditioning on myocardial injury in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery: a randomised controlled trial , 2008 .

[28]  M. Hayward,et al.  Effect of remote ischaemic preconditioning on myocardial injury in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery: a randomised controlled trial , 2007, The Lancet.

[29]  P. Shah,et al.  Comparison of coronary artery bypass surgery with percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stents for unprotected left main coronary artery disease. , 2006, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[30]  D. Liem,et al.  Transient limb ischemia induces remote ischemic preconditioning in vivo. , 2003, Circulation.

[31]  W. Ko,et al.  Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support for adult postcardiotomy cardiogenic shock. , 2002, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[32]  Bradley G Hammill,et al.  A decade of change--risk profiles and outcomes for isolated coronary artery bypass grafting procedures, 1990-1999: a report from the STS National Database Committee and the Duke Clinical Research Institute. Society of Thoracic Surgeons. , 2002, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[33]  R. Kloner,et al.  Regional Ischemic 'Preconditioning' Protects Remote Virgin Myocardium From Subsequent Sustained Coronary Occlusion , 1993, Circulation.