The current opinion on the use of robots for landmine detection

Anti-Personal landmines are a significant barrier to economic and social development in a number of countries. Several sensors have been developed but each one will probably have to find, if it exists, a specific area of applicability, determined by technological as well as economical or even social factors, and possibly other sensors to work with using some form of sensor fusion. A significant issue concerns the safety of the deminer. For every 5000 mines removed, one deminer is killed. The design of an accurate sensor may reduce the amount of time needed to determine whether a landmine exists, but does not increase the safety of the deminer. Since the safety issues during the eradication process are of great concern, the use and integration of cheap and simple robots and sensors in humanitarian demining has been raised. This removes the deminer from close contact with mines. This paper is concerned mainly with the work that has been done in the area of robotics and landmine detection, the problems involved, the issues that have been overlooked and the future of robots in the field.

[1]  Chandrasekhar Kambhampati,et al.  Multiple manipulator control from a human motor-control perspective , 2003, IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom..

[2]  Howie Choset,et al.  Probabilistic methods for robotic landmine search , 2001, Proceedings 2001 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. Expanding the Societal Role of Robotics in the the Next Millennium (Cat. No.01CH37180).

[3]  Gerald Cook,et al.  Algorithm and simulation development of autonomous robotics search , 1997, Proceedings of the IECON'97 23rd International Conference on Industrial Electronics, Control, and Instrumentation (Cat. No.97CH36066).

[4]  Eric Colon,et al.  Development of a high-mobility wheeled robot for humanitarian mine clearance , 1998, Defense, Security, and Sensing.

[5]  Douglas W. Gage.  Proceedings of the Autonomous Vehicles in Mine Countermeasures Symposium, Monterey CA, 4-7 April 1995 Many-Robot MCM Search Systems , 1995 .

[6]  Andrew B. Kahng,et al.  Distributed sensing and probing with multiple search agents: toward system-level landmine detection solutions , 1995, Defense, Security, and Sensing.

[7]  Kim Barrett,et al.  Control of the Fetch team of robots , 1999, Other Conferences.

[8]  Erann Gat,et al.  Mars microrover navigation: Performance evaluation and enhancement , 1995, Auton. Robots.

[9]  Riccardo Cassinis.  Landmines Detection Methods Using Swarms of Simple Robots , 2000 .

[10]  Chandrasekhar Kambhampati,et al.  A human motor control perspective to multiple manipulator modelling , 2003, Biological Cybernetics.

[11]  Alireza Mohammad Shahri,et al.  Adaptive fuzzy force control of an anti-personnel (AP) mine detector robot , 2001, Canadian Conference on Electrical and Computer Engineering 2001. Conference Proceedings (Cat. No.01TH8555).

[12]  K. Eblagh,et al.  Practical problems in demining and their solutions , 1996 .

[13]  Ian Darrell Kelly,et al.  Faster learning of control parameters through sharing experiences of autonomous mobile robots , 1998, Int. J. Syst. Sci..

[14]  Erol Gelenbe,et al.  Autonomous search for mines , 1998, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[15]  James Trevelyan.  Robots and landmines , 1997 .

[16]  Maki K. Habib,et al.  Mine Clearance Techniques and Technologies for Effective Humanitarian Demining , 2002 .

[17]  Colonel L Dyck.  CLAIM AND REALITY: MECHANICALLY ASSISTED DEMINING , 1999 .

[18]  J.‐D. Nicoud.  Vehicles and robots for humanitarian demining , 1997 .

[19]  Roger Hess.  Mechanical Assistance Systems for Humanitarian Mine & UXO Clearance , 1999 .