A geometric concept of the support hull of the support of a polynomial was used earlier by the authors for developing a tight upper bound on the size of the Cayley-Dixon resultant matrix for an unmixed polynomial system. The relationship between the support hull and the Cayley-Dixon resultant construction is analyzed in this paper. The support hull is shown to play an important role in the construction and analysis of resultant matrices based on the Cayley-Dixon formulation, similar to the role played by the associated convex hull (Newton polytope) for analyzing resultant matrices over the toric variety. For an unmixed polynomial system, the sizes of the resultant matrices (both dialytic as well as nondialytic) constructed using the Cayley-Dixon formulation are determined by the support hull of its support. Consequently, degree of the projection operator (which is in general, a nontrivial multiple of the resultant) computed from such a resultant matrix is determined by the support hull.The support hull of a given support is similar to its convex hull except that instead of the Euclidean distance, the support hull is defined using rectilinear distance. The concept of a support-hull interior point is introduced. It is proved that for an unmixed polynomial system, the size of the resultant matrix (both dialytic and nondialytic) based on the Cayley-Dixon formulation remains the same even if a term whose exponent is support-hull interior with respect to the support is generically added to the polynomial system. This key insight turned out to be instrumental in generalizing the concept of an unmixed polynomial system with a corner-cut support from 2 dimensions to arbitrary dimension as well as identifying an unmixed polynomial system with almost corner-cut support in arbitrary dimension.An algorithm for computing the size (and the lattice points) of the support hull of a given support is presented. It is proved that determining whether a given lattice point is not in the support hull, is NP-complete. A heuristic for computing a good variable ordering for constructing Dixon matrices for mixed as well as unmixed polynomial systems is proposed using the support hull and its projections. This is one of the first results on developing heuristics for variable orderings for constructing resultant matrices. A construction for a Sylvester-type resultant matrix based on the support hull of a polynomial system is also given.
[1]
David Avis,et al.
How good are convex hull algorithms?
,
1995,
SCG '95.
[2]
Deepak Kapur,et al.
Comparison of various multivariate resultant formulations
,
1995,
ISSAC '95.
[3]
Deepak Kapur,et al.
International symposium on symbolic and algebraic computation poster abstracts 2003
,
2003,
SIGS.
[4]
Deepak Kapur,et al.
A new sylvester-type resultant method based on the dixon-bezout formulation
,
2003
.
[5]
A. L. Dixon.
The Eliminant of Three Quantics in two Independent Variables
,
1909
.
[6]
Ron Goldman,et al.
Rectangular corner cutting and Sylvester A-resultants
,
2000,
ISSAC.
[7]
Deepak Kapur,et al.
Constructing Sylvester-type resultant matrices using the Dixon formulation
,
2004,
J. Symb. Comput..
[8]
Deepak Kapur,et al.
Resultants for Unmixed Bivariate Polynomial Systems using the Dixon formulation ∗
,
2002
.
[9]
Deepak Kapur,et al.
Conditions for exact resultants using the Dixon formulation
,
2000,
ISSAC.
[10]
Eng-Wee Chionh.
Rectangular Corner Cutting and Dixon A-resultants
,
2001,
J. Symb. Comput..
[11]
Deepak Kapur,et al.
Sparsity considerations in Dixon resultants
,
1996,
STOC '96.
[12]
Deepak Kapur,et al.
Sparsity considerations in the dixon resultant formulation
,
1996,
STOC 1996.
[13]
I. Shafarevich.
Basic algebraic geometry
,
1974
.
[14]
John F. Canny,et al.
A subdivision-based algorithm for the sparse resultant
,
2000,
JACM.
[15]
Deepak Kapur,et al.
Comparison of various multivariate resultants
,
1995,
ISSAC 1995.
[16]
Deepak Kapur,et al.
Algebraic and geometric reasoning using Dixon resultants
,
1994,
ISSAC '94.
[17]
I. Shafarevich,et al.
Basic algebraic geometry 1 (2nd, revised and expanded ed.)
,
1994
.
[18]
Deepak Kapur,et al.
Exact resultants for corner-cut unmixed multivariate polynomial systems using the Dixon formulation
,
2003,
J. Symb. Comput..
[19]
J. Canny,et al.
Efficient Incremental Algorithms for the
,
1994
.
[20]
Deepak Kapur,et al.
Resultants for unmixed bivariate polynomial systems produced using the Dixon formulation
,
2004,
J. Symb. Comput..