Quantification techniques for potential CO2 leakage from geological storage sites

CO2 storage monitoring programmes aim to demonstrate the effectiveness of the project in controlling atmospheric CO2 levels, by providing confidence in predictions of the long-term fate of stored CO2 and identifying and measuring any potentially harmful leaks to the environment. In addition, the EU Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS) treats leakages of stored CO2 from the geosphere in to the ocean or atmosphere as emissions, and as such they need to be accounted for. An escape of CO2 from storage may be detected through losses from the reservoir, or migration through the overburden, into shallow groundwater systems, through topsoil and into the atmosphere, or through a seabed into the water column. Various monitoring techniques can be deployed to detect and in some cases quantify leakage in each of these compartments. This paper presents a portfolio of monitoring methods that are appropriate for CO2 leakage quantification, with a view to minimising both uncertainties and costs.

[1]  Sevket Durucan,et al.  A geostatistical and probabilistic spectral image processing methodology for monitoring potential CO2 leakages on the surface , 2011 .

[2]  P. Ricarte,et al.  Post‐stack stratigraphic inversion workflow applied to carbon dioxide storage: application to the saline aquifer of Sleipner field ‡ , 2011 .

[3]  Grant S. Bromhal,et al.  The use of tracers to assess leakage from the sequestration of CO2 in a depleted oil reservoir, New Mexico, USA , 2007 .

[4]  Torkjell Stenvold,et al.  Monitoring gas production and CO2 injection at the Sleipner field using time-lapse gravimetry , 2008 .

[5]  Bernard Bourgeois,et al.  First Modelling Results of the EM Response of a CO2 Storage in the Paris Basin , 2010 .

[6]  A. Christiansen,et al.  A review of helicopter‐borne electromagnetic methods for groundwater exploration , 2009 .

[7]  Takumi Onuma,et al.  Detection of surface deformation related with CO2 injection by DInSAR at In Salah, Algeria , 2009 .

[8]  Curtis M. Oldenburg,et al.  Detection of CO2 leakage by eddy covariance during the ZERT project’s CO2 release experiments , 2009 .

[9]  G. M. Hoversten,et al.  Gravity monitoring of CO2 movement during sequestration: Model studies , 2008 .

[10]  R. Klusman,et al.  A geochemical perspective and assessment of leakage potential for a mature carbon dioxide–enhanced oil recovery project and as a prototype for carbon dioxide sequestration; Rangely field, Colorado , 2003 .

[11]  Ray Leuning,et al.  Atmospheric monitoring and verification technologies for CO2 geosequestration , 2008 .

[12]  N. Chapman,et al.  Acoustic imaging of natural gas seepage in the North Sea: Sensing bubbles controlled by variable currents , 2010 .

[13]  G. Logan,et al.  Australian offshore natural hydrocarbon seepage studies, a review and re-evaluation , 2010 .

[14]  Véronique Carrère,et al.  Carbon dioxide of Pu`u`O`o volcanic plume at Kilauea retrieved by AVIRIS hyperspectral data , 2008 .

[15]  O. Eiken,et al.  4D seismic quantification of a growing CO2 plume at Sleipner, North Sea , 2005 .

[16]  Steve Zegelin,et al.  Testing Lagrangian atmospheric dispersion modelling to monitor CO2 and CH4 leakage from geosequestration , 2009 .

[17]  R. Keir,et al.  Flux and dispersion of gases from the “Drachenschlund” hydrothermal vent at 8°18' S, 13°30' W on the Mid-Atlantic Ridge , 2008 .

[18]  J. Lewicki,et al.  Dynamics of CO2 fluxes and concentrations during a shallow subsurface CO2 release , 2010 .

[19]  Don W. Vasco,et al.  Reservoir monitoring and characterization using satellite geodetic data: Interferometric Synthetic Aperture Radar observations from the Krechba field, Algeria , 2008 .

[20]  M. Meadows.  Time-lapse seismic modeling and inversion of CO2 saturation for storage and enhanced oil recovery , 2008 .

[21]  Andy Chadwick,et al.  Quantitative analysis of time-lapse seismic monitoring data at the Sleipner CO2 storage operation , 2010 .