The Impact of Political Discussion in a Democratizing Society

This study examines interpersonal political discussion in the context of a democratizing society, focusing specifically on its impact on political knowledge and awareness of the danger of majority tyranny. Moreover, following the argument that the normatively desirable impact of political discussion is likely to emerge or be stronger under specific conditions, this study treats disagreement and support for democratization as two moderators of discussion effects. Analysis of a representative survey (n = 800) conducted in Hong Kong shows that frequency of interpersonal political discussion relates positively to political knowledge. The relationship is stronger among people who experience more disagreement in discussion. Support for democracy does not moderate the impact of discussion on knowledge. But a three-way interaction effect is found on awareness of the danger of majority tyranny: Discussion leads to such awareness only among supporters of democracy who experience disagreement in discussion. This study thus both replicates and extends the findings in the existing, mostly U.S.based literature on the impact of political talk.

[1]  Francis L. F. Lee Talk Radio Listening, Opinion Expression and Political Discussion in a Democratizing Society , 2007 .

[2]  S. Verba,et al.  The Civic Culture , 1963 .

[3]  P. S. Visser,et al.  Attitudes in the social context: the impact of social network composition on individual-level attitude strength. , 2004, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[4]  J. Cappella,et al.  Does Disagreement Contribute to More Deliberative Opinion? , 2002 .

[5]  Scott D. McClurg,et al.  The Electoral Relevance of Political Talk: Examining Disagreement and Expertise Effects in Social Networks on Political Participation , 2006 .

[6]  Scott D. McClurg,et al.  Political Disagreement in Context: The Conditional Effect of Neighborhood Context, Disagreement and Political Talk on Electoral Participation , 2006 .

[7]  J. Dryzek Deliberative Democracy And Beyond , 2000 .

[8]  R. Huckfeldt,et al.  Political Communication and Disagreement Among Citizens in Japan and the United States , 2001 .

[9]  M. D. Carpini,et al.  Public deliberation, discursive participation, and citizen engagement: A review of the empirical literature , 2004 .

[10]  Robert Huckfeldt,et al.  The Social Communication of Political Expertise , 2001 .

[11]  S. Verba The Voice of the People , 1993 .

[12]  Clarissa C. David,et al.  The Social Diffusion of Influence Among Adolescents: Group Interaction in a Chat Room Environment About Antidrug Advertisements , 2006 .

[13]  I. Young Inclusion and Democracy , 2002 .

[14]  Frank I. Michelman,et al.  Between Facts and Norms , 1992 .

[15]  M. Schudson,et al.  Why conversation is not the soul of democracy , 1997 .

[16]  R. Myers Interpersonal and mass media communication: Political learning in New Hampshire's first‐in‐the‐nation presidential primary , 1994 .

[17]  Dominique Brossard,et al.  Social Structure and Citizenship: Examining the Impacts of Social Setting, Network Heterogeneity, and Informational Variables on Political Participation , 2004 .

[18]  Dietram A. Scheufele,et al.  Community, Communication, and Participation: The Role of Mass Media and Interpersonal Discussion in Local Political Participation , 1999 .

[19]  Public support for democracy in hong kong , 2005 .

[20]  Bruce C. Straits,et al.  BRINGING STRONG TIES BACK IN INTERPERSONAL GATEWAYS TO POLITICAL INFORMATION AND INFLUENCE , 1991 .

[21]  Dennis Davis,et al.  Democracy and deliberation , 1999 .

[22]  Dietram A. Scheufele,et al.  Examining Differential Gains From Internet Use: Comparing the Moderating Role of Talk and Online Interactions , 2005 .

[23]  Brian G. Southwell,et al.  The Roles of Interpersonal Communication in Mass Media Campaigns , 2007 .

[24]  Lilach Nir,et al.  Ambivalent Social Networks and Their Consequences for Participation , 2005 .

[25]  Dominique Brossard,et al.  Democracy Based on Difference: Examining the Links Between Structural Heterogeneity, Heterogeneity of Discussion Networks, and Democratic Citizenship , 2006 .

[26]  Robert O. Wyatt,et al.  Bridging the spheres: political and personal conversation in public and private spaces , 2000 .

[27]  Francis L. F. Lee Collective Efficacy, Support for Democratization, and Political Participation in Hong Kong , 2006 .

[28]  P. Beck,et al.  VOTERS' INTERMEDIATION ENVIRONMENTS IN THE 1988 PRESIDENTIAL CONTEST , 1991 .

[29]  Patricia Moy,et al.  Predicting Deliberative Conversation: The Impact of Discussion Networks, Media Use, and Political Cognitions , 2006 .

[30]  Dietram A. Scheufele Talk or Conversation? Dimensions of Interpersonal Discussion and Their Implications for Participatory Democracy , 2000 .

[31]  Francis L. F. Lee The Impact of Ordinary Political Conversation on Public Opinion Expression: Is Existence of Discord Necessary? , 2005 .

[32]  Elihu Katz,et al.  News, Talk, Opinion, Participation: The Part Played by Conversation in Deliberative Democracy , 1999 .

[33]  D. Ryfe DOES DELIBERATIVE DEMOCRACY WORK , 2005 .

[34]  R. Lance Holbert,et al.  The role of communication in the formation of an issue-based citizenry , 2002 .

[35]  J. P. Eveland The Effect of Political Discussion in Producing Informed Citizens: The Roles of Information, Motivation, and Elaboration , 2004 .

[36]  Mira Sotirovic, Jack M. McLeod Values, Communication Behavior, and Political Participation , 2001 .

[37]  Diana C. Mutz Cross-cutting Social Networks: Testing Democratic Theory in Practice , 2002, American Political Science Review.

[38]  Diana C. Mutz The Consequences of Cross-Cutting Networks for Political Participation , 2002 .

[39]  J. Ravetz,et al.  Beyond Left and Right , 2004 .

[40]  Dietram A. Scheufele,et al.  Examining Differential Gains from Mass Media and their Implications for Participatory Behavior , 2002, Commun. Res..

[41]  M. A. M. Iver,et al.  Minority Rights and Majority Rule: Ethnic Tolerance in Romania and Bulgaria , 1995 .

[42]  William P. Eveland,et al.  Is It Talking, Thinking, or Both? A Lagged Dependent Variable Model of Discussion Effects on Political Knowledge , 2006 .

[43]  R. Stolzenberg,et al.  Multiple Regression Analysis , 2004 .

[44]  R. Petty,et al.  Extending the bases of subjective attitudinal ambivalence: interpersonal and intrapersonal antecedents of evaluative tension. , 2001, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[45]  Brian G. Southwell,et al.  Connecting Interpersonal and Mass Communication: Science News Exposure, Perceived Ability to Understand Science, and Conversation , 2006 .

[46]  Francis L. F. Lee,et al.  Newspaper editorial discourse and the politics of self-censorship in Hong Kong , 2006 .

[47]  Dennis F. Thompson,et al.  Democracy and Disagreement , 1996 .

[48]  Hoon Lee,et al.  Talking Politics and Engaging Politics: , 2005, Commun. Res..