Discontinuous transition to loop formation in optimal supply networks

The structure and design of optimal supply networks is an important topic in complex networks research. A fundamental trait of natural and man-made networks is the emergence of loops and the trade-off governing their formation: adding redundant edges to supply networks is costly, yet beneficial for resilience. Loops typically form when costs for new edges are small or inputs uncertain. Here, we shed further light on the transition to loop formation. We demonstrate that loops emerge discontinuously when decreasing the costs for new edges for both an edge-damage model and a fluctuating sink model. Mathematically, new loops are shown to form through a saddle-node bifurcation. Our analysis allows to heuristically predict the location and cost where the first loop emerges. Finally, we unveil an intimate relationship among betweenness measures and optimal tree networks. Our results can be used to understand the evolution of loop formation in real-world biological networks.

[1]  W. H. Kersting Radial distribution test feeders , 1991 .

[2]  Raissa M. D'Souza,et al.  Anomalous critical and supercritical phenomena in explosive percolation , 2015, Nature Physics.

[3]  Henrik Ronellenfitsch,et al.  Global Optimization, Local Adaptation, and the Role of Growth in Distribution Networks. , 2016, Physical review letters.

[4]  Ulrik Brandes,et al.  On variants of shortest-path betweenness centrality and their generic computation , 2008, Soc. Networks.

[5]  Igor Linkov,et al.  Resilience and efficiency in transportation networks , 2017, Science Advances.

[6]  M. Franchini,et al.  Comparison of Newton-Raphson Global and Loop Algorithms for Water Distribution Network Resolution , 2014 .

[7]  Henrik Ronellenfitsch,et al.  Non-local impact of link failures in linear flow networks , 2018, New Journal of Physics.

[8]  David Hutchison,et al.  Resilience and survivability in communication networks: Strategies, principles, and survey of disciplines , 2010, Comput. Networks.

[9]  R. Mínguez,et al.  Observability Analysis in Water Transport Networks: Algebraic Approach , 2016 .

[10]  E. Katifori,et al.  The Phenotypes of Fluctuating Flow: Development of Distribution Networks in Biology and the Trade-off between Efficiency, Cost, and Resilience , 2017 .

[11]  Enrico Creaco,et al.  Using EPANET for modelling water distribution systems with users along the pipes , 2014 .

[12]  Dan Hu,et al.  Adaptation and optimization of biological transport networks. , 2013, Physical review letters.

[13]  Allen J. Wood,et al.  Power Generation, Operation, and Control , 1984 .

[14]  E. Ben-Jacob,et al.  Challenges in network science: Applications to infrastructures, climate, social systems and economics , 2012 .

[15]  Enrico Creaco,et al.  The importance of the minimum path criterion in the design of water distribution networks , 2017 .

[16]  M E J Newman,et al.  Finding and evaluating community structure in networks. , 2003, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[17]  Roland N. Pittman,et al.  The Circulatory System and Oxygen Transport , 2011 .

[18]  A. Rinaldo,et al.  Fractal River Basins: Chance and Self-Organization , 1997 .

[19]  K. Schittkowski,et al.  NONLINEAR PROGRAMMING , 2022 .

[20]  Eleni Katifori,et al.  Quantifying Loopy Network Architectures , 2011, PloS one.

[21]  Francis Corson,et al.  Fluctuations and redundancy in optimal transport networks. , 2009, Physical review letters.

[22]  Robin Wilson,et al.  Modern Graph Theory , 2013 .

[23]  Ned H. C. Hwang,et al.  Fundamentals of Hydraulic Engineering Systems , 1987 .

[24]  Mark Newman,et al.  Networks: An Introduction , 2010 .

[25]  Marc Timme,et al.  Hysteretic Percolation from Locally Optimal Individual Decisions. , 2017, Physical review letters.

[26]  Aric Hagberg,et al.  Exploring Network Structure, Dynamics, and Function using NetworkX , 2008, Proceedings of the Python in Science Conference.

[27]  J. Spencer,et al.  Explosive Percolation in Random Networks , 2009, Science.

[28]  Mark E. J. Newman A measure of betweenness centrality based on random walks , 2005, Soc. Networks.

[29]  Voor Een,et al.  The Algebraic Approach , 2005 .

[30]  María F. Laguna,et al.  The Role of Elastic Stresses on Leaf Venation Morphogenesis , 2007, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[31]  R. McMillon,et al.  Regulation of Tissue Oxygenation , 1995 .

[32]  Marc Durand Structure of optimal transport networks subject to a global constraint. , 2007, Physical review letters.

[33]  Enrico Creaco,et al.  Fast network multi-objective design algorithm combined with an a posteriori procedure for reliability evaluation under various operational scenarios , 2012 .

[34]  R. C. Macridis A review , 1963 .

[35]  Y. Couder,et al.  The leaf venation as formed in a tensorial field , 2002 .

[36]  V. Mosbrugger,et al.  Evolution and Function of Leaf Venation Architecture: A Review , 2001 .

[37]  D S Callaway,et al.  Network robustness and fragility: percolation on random graphs. , 2000, Physical review letters.

[38]  Jochen Deuerlein,et al.  Reformulated Co-Tree Flows Method Competitive with the Global Gradient Algorithm for Solving Water Distribution System Equations , 2013 .

[39]  S. Havlin,et al.  Optimization of robustness of complex networks , 2004, cond-mat/0404331.

[40]  Eleni Katifori,et al.  Damage and fluctuations induce loops in optimal transport networks. , 2009, Physical review letters.

[41]  Harry Eugene Stanley,et al.  Catastrophic cascade of failures in interdependent networks , 2009, Nature.

[42]  L. Sack,et al.  Leaf venation: structure, function, development, evolution, ecology and applications in the past, present and future. , 2013, The New phytologist.

[43]  A. Barabasi,et al.  Universal resilience patterns in complex networks , 2016, Nature.

[44]  Marcelo O Magnasco,et al.  Structure, scaling, and phase transition in the optimal transport network. , 2006, Physical review letters.

[45]  J. Anthonisse The rush in a directed graph , 1971 .

[46]  Hiroki Sayama,et al.  Optimization of robustness and connectivity in complex networks. , 2003, Physical review letters.

[47]  Olaf Sporns,et al.  Path ensembles and a tradeoff between communication efficiency and resilience in the human connectome , 2016, Brain Structure and Function.

[48]  J R Banavar,et al.  Topology of the fittest transportation network. , 2000, Physical review letters.

[49]  Julius B. Kirkegaard,et al.  Optimal Transport Flows for Distributed Production Networks. , 2019, Physical review letters.

[50]  Arezki Boudaoud,et al.  Mechanical Stress Induces Remodeling of Vascular Networks in Growing Leaves , 2016, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[51]  Dimitri P. Bertsekas,et al.  Nonlinear Programming , 1997 .

[52]  U. Brandes A faster algorithm for betweenness centrality , 2001 .

[53]  Tom Brown,et al.  PyPSA-Eur: An open optimisation model of the European transmission system , 2018, Energy Strategy Reviews.

[54]  Stephen P. Boyd,et al.  Convex Optimization , 2004, Algorithms and Theory of Computation Handbook.