A Decision Support System for the Prediction of the Trabecular Fracture Zone

Prediction of trabecular fracture zone is a very important element for assessing the fracture risk in patients. The assumption that failure always occurs in local bands, the so called 'fracture zones', with the remaining regions of the structure largely unaffected has been visually verified. Researchers agreed that the identification of the weakest link in the trabecular framework can lead to the prediction of the fracture zone and consequently of the failure event. In this paper, a decision support system (DSS) is proposed for the automatic identification of fracture zone. Initially, an automatic methodological approach based on image processing is applied for the automatic identification of trabecular bone fracture zone in micro-CT datasets, after mechanical testing. Then, a local analysis of the whole specimen is performed on order to compare the structure (Volumes of Interest -VOI) of the broken region to the unbroken one. As a result, for every VOI, 29 morphometrical parameters were computed and used as initial features to the proposed DSS. The DSS comprises of two main modules: the feature selection module and the classifier. The feature selection module is used for reducing the initial size of the input features' subset (29 features) and for keeping the most informative features in order to increase the classification's module performance. To this end, the Sequential Floating Forward Selection (SFFS) algorithm with Fuzzy C-Means evaluation criterion was implemented. For the classification, several classification algorithms including the Multilayer Perceptron (MLP), the Support Vector Machines (SVM), the Naive Bayesian (NB), the k-Nearest Neighbor (KNN) and the k-Means (KM) have been used. Comparing the performance of these classification algorithms, the SFFS-SVM scheme provided the best performance scoring 98% in terms of overall classification accuracy.

[1]  Fabio Baruffaldi,et al.  Dependence of trabecular structure on bone quantity: a comparison between osteoarthritic and non-pathological bone. , 2011, Clinical biomechanics.

[2]  H. Gundersen,et al.  Quantification of connectivity in cancellous bone, with special emphasis on 3-D reconstructions. , 1993, Bone.

[3]  Frank Rosenblatt,et al.  PRINCIPLES OF NEURODYNAMICS. PERCEPTRONS AND THE THEORY OF BRAIN MECHANISMS , 1963 .

[4]  Fabio Baruffaldi,et al.  Volume to density relation in adult human bone tissue. , 2011, Journal of Biomechanics.

[5]  Javier Martinez,et al.  Machine Learning Techniques as a Helpful Tool Toward Determination of Plaque Vulnerability , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[6]  M. Y. Mashor,et al.  Online sequential extreme learning machine for classification of mycobacterium tuberculosis in ziehl-neelsen stained tissue , 2012, 2012 International Conference on Biomedical Engineering (ICoBE).

[7]  Ronald Phlypo,et al.  SVM feature selection for multidimensional EEG data , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP).

[8]  S A Goldstein,et al.  The relationship between the structural and orthogonal compressive properties of trabecular bone. , 1994, Journal of biomechanics.

[9]  R. Mann,et al.  Characterization of microstructural anisotropy in orthotropic materials using a second rank tensor , 1984 .

[10]  Josef Kittler,et al.  Pattern recognition : a statistical approach , 1982 .

[11]  Frank Nielsen,et al.  On weighting clustering , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[12]  Corinna Cortes,et al.  Support-Vector Networks , 1995, Machine Learning.

[13]  Sergios Theodoridis,et al.  Pattern Recognition, Fourth Edition , 2008 .

[14]  S. P. Lloyd,et al.  Least squares quantization in PCM , 1982, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[15]  Josef Kittler,et al.  Floating search methods in feature selection , 1994, Pattern Recognit. Lett..

[16]  George K. Matsopoulos,et al.  Local analysis of trabecular bone fracture , 2011, 2011 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[17]  S. Majumdar,et al.  High-resolution magnetic resonance imaging: three-dimensional trabecular bone architecture and biomechanical properties. , 1998, Bone.

[18]  Maarten Moesen,et al.  A symmetry invariant formulation of the relationship between the elasticity tensor and the fabric tensor. , 1985, Mechanics of materials : an international journal.

[19]  Hsinchun Chen,et al.  Introduction to the special issue on decision support in medicine , 2007, Decis. Support Syst..

[20]  Fabio Baruffaldi,et al.  Anisotropy and inhomogeneity of the trabecular structure can describe the mechanical strength of osteoarthritic cancellous bone. , 2010, Journal of biomechanics.

[21]  Hirokazu Madokoro,et al.  Experimental studies with a hybrid model of unsupervised neural networks , 2011, The 2011 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks.

[22]  George K Matsopoulos,et al.  CT-MRI automatic surface-based registration schemes combining global and local optimization techniques. , 2003, Technology and health care : official journal of the European Society for Engineering and Medicine.

[23]  W. J. Whitehouse The quantitative morphology of anisotropic trabecular bone , 1974, Journal of microscopy.

[24]  S C Cowin,et al.  The fabric dependence of the orthotropic elastic constants of cancellous bone. , 1990, Journal of biomechanics.

[25]  Swaminathan Ramakrishnan,et al.  Assessment and Classification of Mechanical Strength Components of Human Femur Trabecular Bone Using Texture Analysis and Neural Network , 2008, Journal of Medical Systems.

[26]  George K. Matsopoulos,et al.  Automatic identification of trabecular bone fracture , 2010 .

[27]  M. Viergever,et al.  Medical image matching-a review with classification , 1993, IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Magazine.

[28]  Marimuthu Palaniswami,et al.  Computational Intelligence in Gait Research: A Perspective on Current Applications and Future Challenges , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine.

[29]  TOR Hildebrand,et al.  Quantification of Bone Microarchitecture with the Structure Model Index. , 1997, Computer methods in biomechanics and biomedical engineering.

[30]  Fabio Baruffaldi,et al.  Mechanical testing of cancellous bone from the femoral head: experimental errors due to off-axis measurements. , 2007, Journal of biomechanics.

[31]  P. Rüegsegger,et al.  A new method for the model‐independent assessment of thickness in three‐dimensional images , 1997 .

[32]  M Viceconti,et al.  Dependence of mechanical compressive strength on local variations in microarchitecture in cancellous bone of proximal human femur. , 2008, Journal of biomechanics.

[33]  A Odgaard,et al.  Three-dimensional methods for quantification of cancellous bone architecture. , 1997, Bone.