The Mismatch Negativity in Cochlear Implant Users

For individuals with severe or profound hearing loss, electrical stimulation of surviving neural elements by a cochlear implant may partly restore a sensation of hearing. Determining the extent of restoration based on behavioral measures may be difficult, particularly when evaluating young children or individuals who have little or no experience with normal hearing. In normal-hearing individuals, an objective measure of sound discrimination may be obtained by studying the mismatch negativity (MMN) component of the auditory evoked potential. The MMN may be evoked by a number of physical differences in acoustic stimuli including duration and pitch. For cochlear implant users, analogous stimulus differences may be produced by changing the length of a stimulus pulse train or by changing the pair of activated electrodes along a multi-electrode implant array. This paper will provide an overview of our current results, comparing evoked response data recorded from both normal-hearing individuals and cochlear implant users. In both normal- hearing individuals and cochlear implant users, MMNs were evoked by differences in stimulus train duration and pitch (or electrode pair activation in cochlear implant users). These findings suggest that the MMN may be a useful method for assessing the discriminability of electrical stimulation patterns produced by a cochlear implant. Eventually, information gained by MMN testing may yield important information for developing rehabilitation programs for the individual user.

[1]  N Marangos,et al.  COCHLEAR IMPLANTS , 1976, The Lancet.

[2]  T. Carrell,et al.  The mismatch negativity cortical evoked potential elicited by speech in cochlear-implant users , 1993, Hearing Research.

[3]  R. Näätänen,et al.  Early selective-attention effects on the evoked potential: A critical review and reinterpretation , 1979, Biological Psychology.

[4]  T. Picton,et al.  The N1 wave of the human electric and magnetic response to sound: a review and an analysis of the component structure. , 1987, Psychophysiology.

[5]  E. Owens,et al.  Cochlear implants in young deaf children , 1990 .

[6]  Mikko Sams,et al.  Event-Related Potentials to Infrequent Changes in Synthesized Phonetic Stimuli , 1990, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[7]  R. Näätänen The role of attention in auditory information processing as revealed by event-related potentials and other brain measures of cognitive function , 1990, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[8]  M Hoke,et al.  Evoked magnetic responses of the human auditory cortex to minor pitch changes: localization of the mismatch field. , 1992, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[9]  R. Näätänen,et al.  Auditory frequency discrimination and event-related potentials. , 1985, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[10]  T. Carrell,et al.  Mismatch negativity in school-age children to speech stimuli that are just perceptibly different. , 1993, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[11]  R. Hari,et al.  Reactions of human auditory cortex to a change in tone duration , 1989, Hearing Research.

[12]  I. Winkler,et al.  The effect of small variation of the frequent auditory stimulus on the event-related brain potential to the infrequent stimulus. , 1990, Psychophysiology.

[13]  K. Reinikainen,et al.  Right hemisphere dominance of different mismatch negativities. , 1991, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[14]  Risto Näätänen,et al.  5 The Orienting Reflex and the N2 Deflection of the Event-Related Potential (ERP) , 1983 .

[15]  F. Perrin,et al.  Brain generators implicated in the processing of auditory stimulus deviance: a topographic event-related potential study. , 1990, Psychophysiology.

[16]  G Nyman,et al.  Mismatch negativity (MMN) for sequences of auditory and visual stimuli: evidence for a mechanism specific to the auditory modality. , 1990, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[17]  K. Reinikainen,et al.  Do event-related potentials to infrequent decrements in duration of auditory stimuli demonstrate a memory trace in man? , 1989, Neuroscience Letters.

[18]  T. Carrell,et al.  Mismatch negativity event-related potential elicited by speech stimuli. , 1992, Ear and hearing.

[19]  M. Scherg,et al.  A Source Analysis of the Late Human Auditory Evoked Potentials , 1989, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[20]  Michael Scherg,et al.  Dipole sources potentials of the auditory cortex in normal subjects and in patients with temporal lobe lesions , 1990 .