Which trait dissimilarity for functional diversity: trait means or trait overlap?

Question: Many functional diversity indices require the calculation of functional trait dissimilarities between species. However, very little is known about how the dissimilarity measure used might affect conclusions about ecological processes drawn from functional diversity. Methods: We simulated real applications of functional diversity, to illustrate the key properties of the two most common families of dissimilarity measures: (1) ‘Gower’ distance, using only ‘mean trait’ value per species and then standardizing each trait, e.g. relative to its range; (2) ‘trait overlap’ between species, which takes into account within-species trait variability.We then examine how these approaches could affect conclusions about ecological processes commonly assessed with functional diversity. We also propose a new R function (‘trova’, i.e. TRait OVerlAp) which performs computations to estimate species trait dissimilaritywith different types of data. Results: The trait overlap approach generally produces a less context-dependentmeasure of functional dissimilarity. For example, the results are less dependent on the transformation of trait data (often required in empirical datasets) and on the particular pool of species considered (i.e. trait range, regularity and presence of outliers). The results therefore could bemore easily compared across studies and biomes. Further, trait overlap more reliably reproduces patterns expected when niche differentiation structures communities. The Gower approach, on the contrary,more reliably detects environmental filtering effects. Conclusion: The two approaches imply different conceptions of how species dissimilarities relate to niche differentiation. Trait overlap is suitable for testing the effect of species interactions on functional diversity within local communities, especiallywhen relatively small differences in species traits are linked to different resource acquisition. Gower is better suited to detecting changes in functional diversity along environmental gradients, as greater differences in trait values reflect increased niche differentiation. Combining trait overlap and Gower approachesmay provide a novel way to assess the joint effects of environmental filtering and niche complementarity on community assembly. We suggest that attention should be given not only to the index of functional diversity considered but also whether the dissimilarity used is appropriate for the study context.

[1]  D. Mouillot,et al.  Niche overlap estimates based on quantitative functional traits: a new family of non-parametric indices , 2005, Oecologia.

[2]  William G. Lee,et al.  Functional richness, functional evenness and functional divergence: the primary components of functional diversity , 2005 .

[3]  F. Bello,et al.  Community trait response to environment: disentangling species turnover vs intraspecific trait variability effects , 2011 .

[4]  F. Bello,et al.  Functional diversity: a tool for answering challenging ecological questions , 2013 .

[5]  Wilfried Thuiller,et al.  The partitioning of diversity: showing Theseus a way out of the labyrinth , 2010 .

[6]  David Mouillot,et al.  Functional regularity: a neglected aspect of functional diversity , 2004, Oecologia.

[7]  J. Gower A General Coefficient of Similarity and Some of Its Properties , 1971 .

[8]  F. Bello,et al.  Impact of plant invasions on functional diversity in the vegetation of Central Europe , 2013 .

[9]  P. Legendre,et al.  A distance-based framework for measuring functional diversity from multiple traits. , 2010, Ecology.

[10]  M. Maestro,et al.  Functional traits of woody plants: correspondence of species rankings between field adults and laboratory-grown seedlings? , 2003 .

[11]  Wilfried Thuiller,et al.  From diversity indices to community assembly processes: a test with simulated data , 2012 .

[12]  S. Pledger,et al.  A unified analysis of niche overlap incorporating data of different types , 2011 .

[13]  D. Mouillot,et al.  New multidimensional functional diversity indices for a multifaceted framework in functional ecology. , 2008, Ecology.

[14]  Calyampudi R. Rao Diversity and dissimilarity coefficients: A unified approach☆ , 1982 .

[15]  C. Ricotta A note on functional diversity measures , 2005 .

[16]  Martin Daufresne,et al.  A user's guide to functional diversity indices , 2010 .

[17]  W. Thuiller,et al.  Resolving Darwin’s naturalization conundrum: a quest for evidence , 2010 .

[18]  R. Rousseau,et al.  Measuring Biodiversity , 1999 .

[19]  M. Mayfield,et al.  Opposing effects of competitive exclusion on the phylogenetic structure of communities. , 2010, Ecology letters.

[20]  Kevin McConway,et al.  Phylogeny and the hierarchical organization of plant diversity. , 2006, Ecology.

[21]  H. S. Ollero,et al.  Taxonomical and functional diversity turnover in Mediterranean grasslands: interactions between grazing, habitat type and rainfall , 2012 .

[22]  David Mouillot,et al.  Functional diversity measures: an overview of their redundancy and their ability to discriminate community assembly rules , 2010 .

[23]  David D. Ackerly,et al.  Functional trait and phylogenetic tests of community assembly across spatial scales in an Amazonian forest , 2010 .

[24]  M. Pärtel,et al.  The species pool and its relation to species richness : evidence from Estonian plant communities , 1996 .

[25]  R. Pakeman Functional diversity indices reveal the impacts of land use intensification on plant community assembly , 2011 .

[26]  Mark Westoby,et al.  A leaf-height-seed (LHS) plant ecology strategy scheme , 1998, Plant and Soil.

[27]  R M May,et al.  Niche overlap as a function of environmental variability. , 1972, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[28]  M. Bonsall,et al.  Measuring biodiversity to explain community assembly: a unified approach , 2011, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[29]  Kevin J. Gaston,et al.  Functional diversity (FD), species richness and community composition , 2002 .

[30]  Sandra Díaz,et al.  Plant functional traits and environmental filters at a regional scale , 1998 .

[31]  J. Lepš,et al.  Niche overlap reveals the effects of competition, disturbance and contrasting assembly processes in experimental grassland communities , 2011 .

[32]  Jan Lepš,et al.  Quantifying and interpreting functional diversity of natural communities: practical considerations matter , 2006 .

[33]  F. Bello,et al.  CLO-PLA: the database of clonal and bud bank traits of Central European flora. , 2009 .

[34]  M. Maestro,et al.  Functional traits of woody plants: correspondence of species rankings between field adults and laboratory-grown seedlings? , 2003 .

[35]  R. Macarthur,et al.  The Limiting Similarity, Convergence, and Divergence of Coexisting Species , 1967, The American Naturalist.

[36]  Zoltán Botta-Dukát,et al.  Rao's quadratic entropy as a measure of functional diversity based on multiple traits , 2005 .

[37]  Cyrille Violle,et al.  The return of the variance: intraspecific variability in community ecology. , 2012, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[38]  Owen L. Petchey,et al.  Extinction and the loss of functional diversity , 2002, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[39]  Paul A. Keddy,et al.  Assembly rules, null models, and trait dispersion : new questions from old patterns , 1995 .

[40]  S. Lavorel,et al.  On the importance of intraspecific variability for the quantification of functional diversity , 2012 .

[41]  M. Pärtel,et al.  Ecological assembly rules in plant communities—approaches, patterns and prospects , 2012, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[42]  Wilfried Thuiller,et al.  Hierarchical effects of environmental filters on the functional structure of plant communities: a case study in the French Alps , 2013 .

[43]  Wilfried Thuiller,et al.  Quantifying the relevance of intraspecific trait variability for functional diversity , 2011 .

[44]  Nathan G. Swenson,et al.  Variation in leaf functional trait values within and across individuals and species: an example from a Costa Rican dry forest , 2010 .

[45]  D. Mouillot,et al.  Does niche overlap control relative abundance in French lacustrine fish communities? A new method incorporating functional traits. , 2008, The Journal of animal ecology.

[46]  Nadejda A. Soudzilovskaia,et al.  Global to community scale differences in the prevalence of convergent over divergent leaf trait distributions in plant assemblages , 2011 .

[47]  Martin Hermy,et al.  The LEDA Traitbase: a database of life‐history traits of the Northwest European flora , 2008 .

[48]  Anne-Béatrice Dufour,et al.  On the challenge of treating various types of variables: application for improving the measurement of functional diversity , 2009 .