Characterization of Spatially Homogeneous Regions Based on Temporal Patterns of Fine Particulate Matter in the Continental United States

Abstract Statistical analyses of time-series or spatial data have been widely used to investigate the behavior of ambient air pollutants. Because air pollution data are generally collected in a wide area of interest over a relatively long period, such analyses should take into account both spatial and temporal characteristics. The objective of this study is 2-fold: (1) to identify an efficient way to characterize the spatial variations of fine particulate matter (PM2.5) concentrations based solely upon their temporal patterns, and (2) to analyze the temporal and seasonal patterns of PM2.5 concentrations in spatially homogenous regions. This study used 24-hr average PM2.5 concentrations measured every third day during a period between 2001 and 2005 at 522 monitoring sites in the continental United States. A k-means clustering algorithm using the correlation distance was used to investigate the similarity in patterns between temporal profiles observed at the monitoring sites. A k-means clustering analysis produced six clusters of sites with distinct temporal patterns that were able to identify and characterize spatially homogeneous regions of the United States. The study also presents a rotated principal component analysis (RPCA) that has been used for characterizing spatial patterns of air pollution and discusses the difference between the clustering algorithm and RPCA.

[1]  Roger Woodard,et al.  Interpolation of Spatial Data: Some Theory for Kriging , 1999, Technometrics.

[2]  W. Malm,et al.  An investigation of the dominant source regions of fine sulfur in the western United States and their areas of influenve , 1990 .

[3]  R. Burnett,et al.  Lung cancer, cardiopulmonary mortality, and long-term exposure to fine particulate air pollution. , 2002, JAMA.

[4]  David E. Booth,et al.  Analysis of Incomplete Multivariate Data , 2000, Technometrics.

[5]  William C. Malm,et al.  A 10‐year spatial and temporal trend of sulfate across the United States , 2002 .

[6]  Yongtao Hu,et al.  Uncertainty in air quality model evaluation for particulate matter due to spatial variations in pollutant concentrations , 2006 .

[7]  Peter H. McMurry,et al.  Particulate Matter Science for Policy Makers , 2005 .

[8]  Charles E. Heckler,et al.  Applied Multivariate Statistical Analysis , 2005, Technometrics.

[9]  W. Malm.  Characteristics and origins of haze in the continental United States , 1992 .

[10]  William C. Malm,et al.  Spatial and monthly trends in speciated fine particle concentration in the United States , 2004 .

[11]  W. Malm,et al.  Spatial and seasonal trends in particle concentration and optical extinction in the United States , 1994 .

[12]  Brian Eder,et al.  Spatio-temporal characterization of tropospheric ozone across the eastern United States , 2004 .

[13]  Sharon Phillips,et al.  Comparison of spatial patterns of pollutant distribution with CMAQ predictions , 2006 .

[14]  Stefan Tilmes,et al.  Investigation on the spatial scales of the variability in measured near‐ground ozone mixing ratios , 1998 .

[15]  Jenise L. Swall,et al.  A Bayesian statistical approach for the evaluation of CMAQ , 2006 .

[16]  P. Stolpman,et al.  Environmental Protection Agency , 2020, The Grants Register 2022.

[17]  W. Cleveland.  Robust Locally Weighted Regression and Smoothing Scatterplots , 1979 .

[18]  J. Seinfeld,et al.  Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics: From Air Pollution to Climate Change , 1997 .

[19]  M. Stein,et al.  Statistical comparison of observed and CMAQ modeled daily sulfate levels , 2004 .

[20]  R. Zellner,et al.  John H. Seinfeld and Spyros N. Pandis: Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, from Air Pollution to Climate Change , 2000 .

[21]  Jing-Shiang Hwang,et al.  Site Representativeness of Urban Air Monitoring Stations. , 1996, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[22]  David M. Holland,et al.  Trends in atmospheric sulfur and nitrogen species in the eastern United States for 1989–1995 , 1998 .

[23]  Gwilym M. Jenkins,et al.  Time series analysis, forecasting and control , 1972 .

[24]  Guido Barone,et al.  A hierarchical Bayesian approach to the spatio-temporal modeling of air quality data , 2006 .

[25]  Brian K. Eder,et al.  A characterization of the spatiotemporal variability of non-urban ozone concentrations over the eastern United States , 1993 .

[26]  K. Fitzgerald,et al.  Measurements of Rural Sulfur Dioxide and Particle Sulfate: Analysis of CASTNet Data, 1987 through 1996. , 1999, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[27]  The relationship between empirical orthogonal functions and sources of air pollution , 1991 .

[28]  E. N. Lawrence.  Clean Air Act , 1971, Nature.

[29]  Spatial and Temporal Patterns in Particle Data Measured During the MOHAVE Study , 1997 .

[30]  Thomas Lumley,et al.  Spatial Characteristics of Fine Particulate Matter: Identifying Representative Monitoring Locations in Seattle, Washington , 2002, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[31]  Laurie A. McNair,et al.  Spatial inhomogeneity in pollutant concentrations, and their implications for air quality model evaluation , 1996 .

[32]  Exploring Spatial Patterns of Particulate Sulfur and OMH from the Project MOHAVE Summer Intensive Regional Network Using Analyses of Variance Techniques and Meteorological Parameters as Sort Determinants , 2000, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[33]  J. Schwartz,et al.  Is Daily Mortality Associated Specifically with Fine Particles? , 1996, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[34]  David T. Allen,et al.  Daily, Seasonal, and Spatial Trends in PM2.5 Mass and Composition in Southeast Texas Special Issue of Aerosol Science and Technology on Findings from the Fine Particulate Matter Supersites Program , 2004 .