Further Developments in the Dynamic Stiffness Matrix (DSM) Based Direct Damping Identification Method

Theoretical development of a dynamic stiffness matrix (DSM) based direct damping matrix identification method is revisited in this paper. This method was proposed to identify both the mechanism and spatial distribution of damping in dynamic structures as a matrix of general function of frequency. The objective of this paper, in addition to the review of the theoretical development, is to investigate some major issues regarding the feasibility of this method. The first issue investigated is how the errors in measured frequency response functions (FRF) affect the accuracy of the DSM. It was already known that the DSM is highly sensitive to errors that are present in the FRF. A detailed analytical and computational study is conducted, which finally leads to a sound physical explanation of the high sensitivity of the DSM to measurement errors. A new and also important conclusion is that the leakage error drastically affects the accuracy of the computed DSM. The second major issue reported is the experimental implementation of the DSM based method to minimize the leakage error. Based on the findings presented in this study, a new and improved test setup is designed and developed, which enables the authors to obtain a good quality result that supports the theoretical and numerical analyses previously conducted.

[1]  Jeffery Edward Hylok,et al.  EXPERIMENTAL IDENTIFICATION OF DISTRIBUTED DAMPING MATRICES USING THE DYNAMIC STIFFNESS MATRIX , 2002 .

[2]  Mark Richardson,et al.  Mass, Stiffness, and Damping Matrix Estimates from Structural Measurements , 1987 .

[3]  Pietro Salvini,et al.  Direct updating of non conservative finite element models using measured input-output , 1992 .

[4]  Alex Berman Inherently Incomplete Finite Element Model and Its Effects on Model Updating , 2000 .

[5]  Jay Kim,et al.  Identification of Damping Matrices from Measured Frequency Response Functions , 2001 .

[6]  Bill Fladung,et al.  Windows used for impact testing , 1997 .

[7]  John L. Junkins,et al.  Identification method for lightly damped structures , 1988 .

[8]  Ming-Shaung Ju,et al.  Estimation of Mass, Stiffness and Damping Matrices from Frequency Response Functions , 1996 .

[9]  Joon-Hyun Lee,et al.  DEVELOPMENT AND VALIDATION OF A NEW EXPERIMENTAL METHOD TO IDENTIFY DAMPING MATRICES OF A DYNAMIC SYSTEM , 2001 .

[10]  M. Dalenbring,et al.  DAMPING FUNCTION ESTIMATION BASED ON MEASURED VIBRATION FREQUENCY RESPONSES AND FINITE-ELEMENT DISPLACEMENT MODES , 1999 .

[11]  A. Berman,et al.  System identification of structural dynamic models Theoretical and practical bounds , 1984 .

[12]  S. R. Ibrahim Dynamic Modeling of Structures from Measured Complex Modes , 1982 .

[13]  D. Henwood,et al.  Approximating the hysteretic damping matrix by a viscous matrix for modelling in the time domain , 2002 .

[14]  Daniel J. Inman,et al.  An Iterative Approach to Viscous Damping Matrix Identification , 1997 .

[15]  T. K. Hasselman,et al.  Method for Constructing a Full Modal Damping Matrix from Experimental Measurements , 1972 .

[16]  Sondipon Adhikari,et al.  Towards identification of a general model of damping , 2000 .

[17]  Daniel J. Inman,et al.  Damping matrix identification and experimental verification , 1999, Smart Structures.