The Use and Efficacy of FFR-CT: Real-World Multicenter Audit of Clinical Data With Cost Analysis.

[1]  Deepak L. Bhatt,et al.  2021 AHA/ACC/ASE/CHEST/SAEM/SCCT/SCMR Guideline for the Evaluation and Diagnosis of Chest Pain: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. , 2021, Circulation.

[2]  R. Rajani,et al.  Fractional flow reserve derived from computed tomography coronary angiography in the assessment and management of stable chest pain: the FORECAST randomized trial , 2021, European heart journal.

[3]  K. Channon,et al.  Opportunities and challenges of implementing computed tomography fractional flow reserve into clinical practice , 2020, Heart.

[4]  Marco Valgimigli,et al.  2019 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of chronic coronary syndromes. , 2019, European heart journal.

[5]  Charles A. Taylor,et al.  Comparison of Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography, Fractional Flow Reserve, and Perfusion Imaging for Ischemia Diagnosis. , 2019, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[6]  Jeroen J. Bax,et al.  Real-world clinical utility and impact on clinical decision-making of coronary computed tomography angiography-derived fractional flow reserve: lessons from the ADVANCE Registry , 2018, European heart journal.

[7]  Jeroen J. Bax,et al.  The performance of non-invasive tests to rule-in and rule-out significant coronary artery stenosis in patients with stable angina: a meta-analysis focused on post-test disease probability , 2018, European heart journal.

[8]  H. Bøtker,et al.  Diagnosing coronary artery disease after a positive coronary computed tomography angiography: the Dan-NICAD open label, parallel, head to head, randomized controlled diagnostic accuracy trial of cardiovascular magnetic resonance and myocardial perfusion scintigraphy , 2018, European heart journal cardiovascular Imaging.

[9]  F. Rybicki,et al.  CAD-RADS™: Coronary Artery Disease - Reporting and Data System: An Expert Consensus Document of the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography (SCCT), the American College of Radiology (ACR) and the North American Society for Cardiovascular Imaging (NASCI). Endorsed by the American College of Car , 2016, Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR.

[10]  Johannes B Reitsma,et al.  STARD 2015 guidelines for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies: explanation and elaboration , 2016, BMJ Open.

[11]  Charles A. Taylor,et al.  Noninvasive Fractional Flow Reserve Derived From Coronary CT Angiography: Clinical Data and Scientific Principles. , 2015, JACC. Cardiovascular imaging.

[12]  Matthias Gutberlet,et al.  Clinical outcomes of fractional flow reserve by computed tomographic angiography-guided diagnostic strategies vs. usual care in patients with suspected coronary artery disease: the prospective longitudinal trial of FFRCT: outcome and resource impacts study , 2015, European heart journal.

[13]  Scot-Heart Investigators,et al.  CT coronary angiography in patients with suspected angina due to coronary heart disease (SCOT-HEART): an open-label, parallel-group, multicentre trial , 2015, The Lancet.

[14]  E. Yow,et al.  A selection of recent, original research papers , 2015, Journal of Nuclear Cardiology.

[15]  E. Nagel,et al.  Diagnostic Accuracy of Stress Myocardial Perfusion Imaging Compared to Invasive Coronary Angiography With Fractional Flow Reserve Meta-Analysis , 2015, Circulation. Cardiovascular imaging.

[16]  Hiroshi Ito,et al.  Diagnostic performance of noninvasive fractional flow reserve derived from coronary computed tomography angiography in suspected coronary artery disease: the NXT trial (Analysis of Coronary Blood Flow Using CT Angiography: Next Steps). , 2014, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[17]  Charles A. Taylor,et al.  Computational fluid dynamics applied to cardiac computed tomography for noninvasive quantification of fractional flow reserve: scientific basis. , 2013, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[18]  Richard D. White,et al.  Patient management after noninvasive cardiac imaging results from SPARC (Study of myocardial perfusion and coronary anatomy imaging roles in coronary artery disease). , 2012, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[19]  A. Dunning,et al.  Diagnosis of ischemia-causing coronary stenoses by noninvasive fractional flow reserve computed from coronary computed tomographic angiograms. Results from the prospective multicenter DISCOVER-FLOW (Diagnosis of Ischemia-Causing Stenoses Obtained Via Noninvasive Fractional Flow Reserve) study. , 2011, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[20]  N Waugh,et al.  Systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of 64-slice or higher computed tomography angiography as an alternative to invasive coronary angiography in the investigation of coronary artery disease. , 2008, Health technology assessment.