The time course of brain activity in reading English and Chinese: An ERP study of Chinese bilinguals

Chinese bilinguals performed a delayed naming task, reading both Chinese characters and English words, while EEGs were recorded by a 128‐channel system. Principle component analysis (PCA) of Event Related Potentials (ERP) from the onset of the stimulus suggested a temporal unfolding of graphic, phonological, and semantic processing that depended on both language and word frequency. At 150 msec, Chinese produced an earlier and higher amplitude shift (N150) than English. At 250 msec, frequency effects were significant for both Chinese and English, but at 450 msec, only the English frequency effect was reliable. Source localization analysis by Low Resolution Electromagnetic Tomography (LORETA) showed bilateral occipital (left BA 17, right BA 18) visual processing of Chinese characters with left occipital only (left BA 17) for English high‐frequency words. Low‐frequency English words showed activation bilaterally, but with a more diffused and extended temporal pattern. Right prefrontal area (BA 10) was found to be strongly activated in the mid latency (300–400 msec) period of Chinese character naming, whereas English word naming showed more medial frontal (BA 8, and 10) activation. A post 450‐msec visual verification was found to be general for both writing systems. Hum. Brain Mapping 18:167–175, 2003. © 2003 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

[1]  E Donchin,et al.  Brain potentials as indices of orthographic and phonological interaction during word matching. , 1987, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[2]  S. Geisser,et al.  On methods in the analysis of profile data , 1959 .

[3]  Charles A. Perfetti,et al.  The time course of graphic, phonological, and semantic activation in Chinese character identification , 1998 .

[4]  Z. Koles,et al.  Trends in EEG source localization. , 1998, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[5]  J. Pernier,et al.  ERP Manifestations of Processing Printed Words at Different Psycholinguistic Levels: Time Course and Scalp Distribution , 1999, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[6]  D. Tucker,et al.  Scalp electrode impedance, infection risk, and EEG data quality , 2001, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[7]  F. Chua.  Phonological recoding in Chinese logograph recognition. , 1999 .

[8]  S. Petersen,et al.  Effects of Lexicality, Frequency, and Spelling-to-Sound Consistency on the Functional Anatomy of Reading , 1999, Neuron.

[9]  D. O. Wastell,et al.  On the correlated nature of evoked brain activity: Biophysical and statistical considerations , 1981, Biological Psychology.

[10]  Margot J. Taylor,et al.  Guidelines for using human event-related potentials to study cognition: recording standards and publication criteria. , 2000, Psychophysiology.

[11]  S. Petersen,et al.  Neuroimaging studies of word reading. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[12]  H. Kucera,et al.  Computational analysis of present-day American English , 1967 .

[13]  G.J.M. van Boxtel,et al.  Computational and statistical methods for analyzing event-related potential data , 1998 .

[14]  M. Chee,et al.  Overlap and Dissociation of Semantic Processing of Chinese Characters, English Words, and Pictures: Evidence from fMRI , 2000, NeuroImage.

[15]  P. Fox,et al.  The Neural System Underlying Chinese Logograph Reading , 2001, NeuroImage.

[16]  M. Kutas,et al.  Reading senseless sentences: brain potentials reflect semantic incongruity. , 1980, Science.

[17]  Henry S.R. Kao,et al.  Cognitive Neuroscience Studies of the Chinese Language , 2002 .

[18]  J. Hellige.  Hemispheric asymmetry for components of visual information processing. , 1995 .

[19]  D. Lehmann,et al.  Low resolution electromagnetic tomography: a new method for localizing electrical activity in the brain. , 1994, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[20]  R. Chapman,et al.  EP Component Identification and Measurement by Principal Components-Analysis , 1995, Brain and Cognition.

[21]  M. Chee,et al.  Mandarin and English Single Word Processing Studied with Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging , 1999, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[22]  Deborah A. Vitacco,et al.  Correspondence of event‐related potential tomography and functional magnetic resonance imaging during language processing , 2002, Human brain mapping.

[23]  A Pollatsek,et al.  The activation of phonology during silent Chinese word reading. , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[24]  Charles A. Perfetti,et al.  Whole word, frequency-general phonology in semantic processing of Chinese characters , 1999 .

[25]  C. Perfetti,et al.  VERY EARLY PHONOLOGICAL ACTIVATION IN CHINESE READING , 1995 .

[26]  P T Fox,et al.  Brain activation in the processing of Chinese characters and words: A functional MRI study , 2000, Human brain mapping.

[27]  Michael D. Rugg,et al.  Event-related potentials in phonological matching tasks , 1984, Brain and Language.