Successive days, related travel behaviour?

This paper investigates the relationships between the travel behaviour on successive days of a week. It has an explorative character, because the Mobidrive data allow this analysis for the first time. The hypotheses and the structure of the models are based on the suggestions of the literature and on the descriptive analysis of the data. Three different models are developed using the results of the continuous six-week travel diary and structural equation modelling (SEM). In the models person- and household-variables are exogenous and variables describing travel behaviour are endogenous. One model contains the number of trips per day (the days of one week and the following Monday) as endogenous variables, one model the distances travelled per day and one model the number of trips made by the female and male partner of a couple or family. The results show that there are relationships between the days. The impact of the previous day and within limits the impact of the previous Monday on a given day, the differences between the weekdays and the weekend and the small influence of the socio-demographic variables on travel behaviour are the most important findings. Additionally dependencies between the partners in a household could be demonstrated.

[1]  R. P. McDonald,et al.  Structural Equations with Latent Variables , 1989 .

[2]  K. Axhausen,et al.  Observing the rhythms of daily life: A six-week travel diary , 2002 .

[3]  Anja Simma Verkehrsverhalten als eine Funktion soziodemografischer und räumlicher Faktoren , 2000 .

[4]  K. Axhausen,et al.  Observing the rhythms of daily life , 2000 .

[5]  R Kitamura,et al.  AN EVALUATION OF ACTIVITY-BASED TRAVEL ANALYSIS : REVIEW PAPER , 1988 .

[6]  J. O. Huff,et al.  Classification issues in the analysis of complex travel behavior , 1986 .

[7]  M. Clarke,et al.  The significance and measurement of variability in travel behaviour , 1988 .

[8]  E. Rigdon Book Review of Structural Equation Modeling: Present and Future: A Festschrift in Honor of Karl Joreskog edited by Robert Cudeck, Stephen Du Toit, and Dag Sorbom , 2002 .

[9]  R. Kitamura An evaluation of activity-based travel analysis , 1988 .

[10]  Karl G. Jöreskog,et al.  Lisrel 8: User's Reference Guide , 1997 .

[11]  R. Mueller Basic Principles of Structural Equation Modeling: An Introduction to LISREL and EQS , 1996 .

[12]  Geoffrey M. Maruyama,et al.  Basics of structural equation modeling , 1997 .

[13]  Kay W. Axhausen,et al.  Day on day dependencies in travel: first results using ARIMA modelling , 2001 .

[14]  Peter Jones,et al.  Developments in dynamic and activity-based approaches to travel analysis , 1990 .

[15]  Stefan Schönfelder,et al.  Analysing the rhythms of travel using survival analysis , 2000 .

[16]  E. I. Pas,et al.  Intrapersonal variability in daily urban travel behavior: Some additional evidence , 1995 .

[17]  R. Schlich,et al.  Measurement issues in identifying variability in travel behaviour , 2001 .