Do They Understand? (Part I): Parental Consent for Children Participating in Clinical Anesthesia and Surgery Research

Background Central to the tenet of informed consent is the quality of disclosure of information by the investigator and the understanding thereof by the research subject or his or her surrogate. This study was designed to measure parents’ understanding of the elements of informed consent for clinical studies in which their children had been approached to participate. Methods The study sample consisted of 505 parents who had been approached for permission to allow their child to participate in a clinical anesthesia or surgery study. Regardless of whether the parent consented (consenters, n = 411) or declined (nonconsenters, n = 94) to their child's participation in a study, they were interviewed to determine their understanding of 11 elements of consent. Two independent assessors who were familiar with the study protocols scored the parents’ levels of understanding. Results Parents perceived their overall understanding of the elements of consent as high (8.7 ± 1.6; 0–10 scale); however, this represented a significant overestimation compared with the assessors’ measures of parental understanding (7.3 ± 1.8;P < 0.0001). Furthermore, consenters had greater understanding than nonconsenters (7.6 ± 1.6 vs. 6.1 ± 1.9;P < 0.001). Several predictors of understanding were identified, including whether the parent consented, education level, clarity of disclosure, child in previous study, age of parent, parent listened to disclosure, and degree to which parent read the consent document. The day on which consent was sought had no impact on the level of understanding. Conclusions Parents approached for permission to allow their child to participate in a research study had less than optimal understanding of the elements of consent. As such, investigators must make every effort to enhance understanding and ensure that parents have sufficient information to make informed decisions regarding their child's participation in research studies.

[1]  Carol B. Perez,et al.  Principles of Biomedical Ethics, 4th Edition , 1995 .

[2]  P. A. Kelly,et al.  Readability of pediatric biomedical research informed consent forms. , 1990, Pediatrics.

[3]  R. Barbarash,et al.  The Deaconess Informed Consent Comprehension Test: An Assessment Tool for Clinical Research Subjects , 1996, Pharmacotherapy.

[4]  J. Ensinck,et al.  ARE RESEARCH SUBJECTS REALLY INFORMED? , 1975, The Western journal of medicine.

[5]  T. Beauchamp,et al.  Principles of biomedical ethics , 1991 .

[6]  E D Freis,et al.  Informed consent: How much does the patient understand? , 1980, Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics.

[7]  W. Grove.  Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions, 2nd ed , 1981 .

[8]  D. Cella,et al.  Reliability and Concurrent Validity of Three Visual-Analogue Mood Scales , 1986, Psychological reports.

[9]  Michael S Lauer,et al.  Readability of informed-consent forms. , 2003, The New England journal of medicine.

[10]  E. Steyerberg,et al.  Informed consent, parental awareness, and reasons for participating in a randomised controlled study , 1998, Archives of disease in childhood.

[11]  M. Folstein,et al.  Reliability, validity, and clinical application of the visual analogue mood scale , 1973, Psychological Medicine.

[12]  D. Elbourne,et al.  Making sense of randomization; responses of parents of critically ill babies to random allocation of treatment in a clinical trial. , 1997, Social science & medicine.

[13]  M. Silva,et al.  Enhancing comprehension of information for informed consent: a review of empirical research. , 1988, IRB.

[14]  M. Pello,et al.  Recall of informed consent after endoscopic procedures , 1995, Diseases of the colon and rectum.

[15]  S. Levitan,et al.  Surgical Patients' Attitudes Regarding Participation in Clinical Anesthesia Research , 1996, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[16]  P. Fayers,et al.  Understanding self-rated health , 2002, The Lancet.

[17]  T M Grundner,et al.  On the readability of surgical consent forms. , 1980, The New England journal of medicine.

[18]  C Rayner,et al.  Informed consent. , 2000, British journal of plastic surgery.

[19]  R. Flesch.  A new readability yardstick. , 1948, The Journal of applied psychology.

[20]  A. Tait,et al.  Informed consent for obstetric anesthesia research: factors that influence parturients' decisions to participate. , 2000, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[21]  J. Fleiss.  Statistical methods for rates and proportions , 1974 .

[22]  C. Spurr,et al.  Written informed consent in patients with breast cancer , 1979, Cancer.

[23]  T. Voepel-Lewis,et al.  Factors That Influence Parents' Decisions to Consent to Their Child's Participation in Clinical Anesthesia Research , 1998, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[24]  J. Maltby,et al.  Informed consent for clinical anaesthesia research , 1993, Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie.

[25]  T. Erb,et al.  Permission and Assent for Clinical Research in Pediatric Anesthesia , 2002, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[26]  R. Nelson,et al.  Self-determination is not an appropriate model for understanding parental permission and child assent. , 2002, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[27]  G. Robinson,et al.  Informed consent: recall by patients tested postoperatively. , 1976, Connecticut medicine.

[28]  J. Evans,et al.  Recruiting patients to clinical trials: lessons from studies of growth hormone treatment in renal failure. , 1995, Archives of disease in childhood.

[29]  Terri Voepel-Lewis,et al.  Priorities for disclosure of the elements of informed consent for research: a comparison between parents and investigators , 2002, Paediatric anaesthesia.