This paper presents and discusses physical models for simulating some aspects of neural intelligence, and, in particular, the process of cognition. The main departure from the classical approach here is in utilization of a terminal version of classical dynamics introduced by the author earlier. Based upon violations of the Lipschitz condition at equilibrium points, terminal dynamics attains two new fundamental properties: it is spontaneous and nondeterministic. Special attention is focused on terminal neurodynamics as a particular architecture of terminal dynamics which is suitable for modeling of information flows. Terminal neurodynamics possesses a well-organized probabilistic structure which can be analytically predicted, prescribed, and controlled, and therefore which presents a powerful tool for modeling real-life uncertainties. Two basic phenomena associated with random behavior of neurodynamic solutions are exploited. The first one is a stochastic attractor—a stable stationary stochastic process to which random solutions of a closed system converge. As a model of the cognition process, a stochastic attractor can be viewed as a universal tool for generalization and formation of classes of patterns. The concept of stochastic attractor is applied to model a collective brain paradigm explaining coordination between simple units of intelligence which perform a collective task without direct exchange of information. The second fundamental phenomenon discussed is terminal chaos which occurs in open systems. Applications of terminal chaos to information fusion as well as to explanation and modeling of coordination among neurons in biological systems are discussed. It should be emphasized that all the models of terminal neurodynamics are implementable in analog devices, which means that all the cognition processes discussed in the paper are reducible to the laws of Newtonian mechanics.
[1]
Bernardo A. Huberman.
The Collective Brain
,
1989,
Int. J. Neural Syst..
[2]
Erich Harth,et al.
Order and chaos in neural systems: An approach to the dynamics of higher brain functions
,
1983,
IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.
[3]
Michail Zak,et al.
Weakly connected neural nets
,
1990
.
[4]
D. O. Hebb,et al.
The organization of behavior
,
1988
.
[5]
M. Zak.
Terminal attractors for addressable memory in neural networks
,
1988
.
[6]
W. Pitts,et al.
A Logical Calculus of the Ideas Immanent in Nervous Activity (1943)
,
2021,
Ideas That Created the Future.
[7]
Hans-Georg Geissler,et al.
The temporal architecture of central information processing: Evidence for a tentative time-quantum model
,
1987
.
[8]
Michail Zak,et al.
An unpredictable-dynamics approach to neural intelligence
,
1991,
IEEE Expert.
[9]
S. Kaplan.
The Physiology of Thought
,
1950
.
[10]
John A. Stankovic,et al.
Distributed Processing
,
1978,
Computer.
[11]
M. Zak.
The least constraint principle for learning in neurodynamics
,
1989
.
[12]
Michail Zak.
The problem of irreversibility in Newtonian dynamics
,
1992
.
[13]
Michail Zak,et al.
Terminal model of Newtonian dynamics
,
1993
.
[14]
Michail Zak,et al.
Terminal attractors in neural networks
,
1989,
Neural Networks.