“We weren't intentionally excluding them…just old habits”: Women, (lack of) interest and an engineering student competition team

Student, experiential-learning, engineering, competition teams (SELECT) provide an opportunity for engineering students to practice engineering technical and professional skills. The low representation of women in SELECT is often rationalized as a lack of interest by individual women rather than systemic processes that discourage or exclude women. We employ a qualitative-interpretive design and a cultural constructionist lens to bring into focus the interplay of individual interests, understandings of appropriate gender roles, and structural elements that contribute to a culture of inclusion or exclusion. Primary data consist of 90-minute semi-structured interviews of eight team members and one non-member. By interpreting the narrative portraits of two female students, we show the construction of a team culture where in general women are discouraged from participation based on stereotyped gender roles, by night campus attitudes, and by peers who challenge or ignore their skills, contributions, and interests. One woman persevered through the male-dominated culture because she received the encouragement and support of male peers who engaged as comrades and champions. This paper offers recommendations for institutions to demonstrate commitment to equitable access to experiential learning and to nurture student peer cultures that challenge historic gendered ideologies and rhetoric.

[1]  Catherine T. Amelink,et al.  A comparison of educational factors promoting or discouraging the intent to remain in engineering by gender , 2011 .

[2]  N. Denzin,et al.  The Landscape of Qualitative Research , 2012 .

[3]  Susan E. Walden,et al.  "Imaginary Engineering" or "Re-imagined Engineering": Negotiating Gendered Identities in the Borderland of a College of Engineering , 2009, NWSA Journal.

[4]  Steven D. Brown,et al.  Toward a Unifying Social Cognitive Theory of Career and Academic Interest, Choice, and Performance , 1994 .

[5]  Robert W. Lent,et al.  Contextual supports and barriers to career choice: A social cognitive analysis. , 2000 .

[6]  P. Crosby,et al.  College Peer Culture: Taming the "Monster Within the Gates" , 2010 .

[7]  W. Faulkner `Nuts and Bolts and People' , 2007 .

[8]  Charles A. Malgwi,et al.  Influences on Students' Choice of College Major , 2005 .

[9]  G. Kuh Cultivating “high-stakes” student culture research , 1995 .

[10]  Bente Rasmussen,et al.  Men in male-dominated organizations and their encounter with women intruders , 1994 .

[11]  J. Klugman,et al.  Gender, Social Class, and Exclusion: Collegiate Peer Cultures and Social Reproduction , 2011 .

[12]  H. Harton,et al.  Gender, Empathy, and the Choice of the Psychology Major , 2003 .

[13]  D. Kolb,et al.  Learning Styles and Learning Spaces: Enhancing Experiential Learning in Higher Education , 2005 .

[14]  Iiris Aaltio-Marjosola Gender stereotypes as cultural products of the organization , 1994 .

[15]  T. Orbuch,et al.  People's Accounts Count: The Sociology of Accounts , 1997 .

[16]  Nancy E. Betz,et al.  A self-efficacy approach to the career development of women , 1981 .

[17]  Yvonna S. Lincoln,et al.  The landscape of qualitative research: theories and issues Sage The landscape of qualitative research: theories and issues 480 £24.95 0761926941 0761926941 [Formula: see text]. , 2004, Nurse researcher.

[18]  Virginia Valian Why so slow? : the advancement of women , 1998 .

[19]  Susan E. Walden,et al.  "You choose between TEAM A, good grades, and a girlfriend - you get to choose two!" - How a culture of exclusion is constructed and maintained in an engineering design competition team , 2013 .