Seismic Performance of Geosynthetic-Encased Stone Columns

The geotextile-encased columns (GECs) foundation system for embankments on soft or problematic soils was introduced in 1994. The GECs consist of compacted granular fill similar to common stone columns, but with a main decisive difference: GECs are confined in a high-strength woven geotextile cylinder (encasement). Consequently, they work properly even in extremely soft soils. Granular columns under compressive loads experience different failure modes, such as bulging, general shear failure, and sliding. However, the most common failure mode for stone columns in soft clays is bulging. With the help of GECs, the bulging failure can be prevented. The risk of bulging is even higher for earthquake loading conditions. A vast amount of numerical, analytical, and experimental research has been done to study different aspects of GEC's behavior. Despite this available literature from several researchers, there is not much research, numerically or experimentally, about the seismic behavior of GECs. To analyze the effect of earthquakes on stone columns and to determine how the presence of GECs improves the soil behavior, three-dimensional finite element analysis was used. The results show that the encapsulation of the stone column by a geosynthetic reinforcement (i.e., instead of installing ordinary stone columns, using geosynthetic-encapsulated columns) helps with the integrity of the column and also improves the system behavior under earthquake loading conditions.

[1]  Andrea Galli,et al.  Geo-reinforced sand columns: small scale experimental tests and theoretical modelling. , 2006 .

[2]  M Raithel,et al.  Calculation Models For Dam Foundations With Geotextile Coated Sand Columns , 2000 .

[3]  Abbas Soroush,et al.  3D numerical analyses of geosynthetic encased stone columns , 2012 .

[4]  J. M. Mckenna,et al.  Performance of an embankment supported by stone columns in soft ground , 1975 .

[5]  Dimiter Alexiew,et al.  Geotextile Encased Columns (GEC): Load Capacity, Geotextile Selection and Pre-Design Graphs , 2005 .

[6]  M. Raithel,et al.  Geotextile-Encased Columns-a foundation system for earth structures, illustrated by a dyke project for a works extension in Hamburg , 2004 .

[7]  Chung-Sik Yoo,et al.  Performance of Geosynthetic-Encased Stone Columns in Embankment Construction: Numerical Investigation , 2010 .

[8]  R. D. Barksdale,et al.  Development of methodology for the design and construction of stone columns , 1980 .

[9]  M. Raithel,et al.  Bemessung von geokunststoffummantelten Sandsäulen , 1999 .

[10]  Majid Khabbazian,et al.  Modeling the Behavior of Geosynthetic Encased Columns: Influence of Granular Soil Constitutive Model , 2012 .

[11]  Oliver Detert,et al.  15 years of experience with geotextile encased granular columns as foundation system , 2012 .

[12]  Abdelmalek Bouazza,et al.  Improvement of soft soils using geogrid encased stone columns , 2009 .

[13]  Chandresh H. Solanki,et al.  Reinforced granular column for deep soil stabilization: A review , 2012 .