Anatomic, radiographic, biomechanical, and kinematic evaluation of the anterior cruciate ligament and its two functional bundles.

Outcomes following single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction are generally good. However, a critical review of the literature shows that some patients have residual instability and pain following single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction1-4. Recent clinical investigations have demonstrated that anteroposterior knee laxity, as measured with the KT-1000 and the Lachman test, is not associated with functional outcomes after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction5. Conversely, there is a significant association between the pivot-shift test and functional outcomes after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (p = 0.03), which emphasizes the importance of rotational knee stability for functional recovery5. Biomechanical and kinematic studies have suggested that a more anatomical reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament may provide improved long-term outcomes. In this article, we describe the anatomy, radiographic characteristics, injury patterns, biomechanics, and kinematics of the anterior cruciate ligament. We also summarize the surgical technique and augmentation procedures used in an anatomic two-bundle approach to anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Fig. 1 The fetal knee demonstrates the two bundles of the anterior cruciate ligament: the anteromedial (AM) and the posterolateral (PL) bundle. LFC = lateral femoral condyle. Fetal, arthroscopic, and cadaver studies have shown that the anterior cruciate ligament consists of two functional bundles, the anteromedial bundle and the posterolateral bundle6-8 (Figs. 1, 2, and 3). The nomenclature of the two bundles corresponds to their tibial insertion sites. On the femoral side, the anteromedial bundle originates more proximally and the posterolateral bundle originates more distally. On the tibial side, the anteromedial bundle inserts anteromedially while the posterolateral bundle inserts posterolaterally. The relative position of the two bundles varies with the flexion angle of the knee. In extension, the two bundles are parallel. In flexion, the femoral insertion site of the posterolateral bundle moves anteriorly, and the …

[1]  A. Amis,et al.  Functional anatomy of the anterior cruciate ligament. Fibre bundle actions related to ligament replacements and injuries. , 1991, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[2]  S. Woo,et al.  Quantitative analysis of human cruciate ligament insertions. , 1999, Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association.

[3]  Freddie H. Fu,et al.  Anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using tibialis anterior tendon allografts , 2005 .

[4]  A. Anderson,et al.  Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction , 2001, The American journal of sports medicine.

[5]  A. K. Aune,et al.  Four-Strand Hamstring Tendon Autograft Compared with Patellar Tendon-Bone Autograft for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction , 2001, The American journal of sports medicine.

[6]  J. Richmond,et al.  Patellar versus hamstring tendons in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A meta-analysis. , 2001, Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association.

[7]  Scott Tashman,et al.  Abnormal Rotational Knee Motion during Running after Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction , 2004, The American journal of sports medicine.

[8]  Yuji Yamamoto,et al.  Knee Stability and Graft Function after Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction , 2004, The American journal of sports medicine.

[9]  Freddie H. Fu,et al.  Revision after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction by restoration of the posterolateral bundle , 2005 .

[10]  B. Bach,et al.  Arthroscopic Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Metaanalysis Comparing Patellar Tendon and Hamstring Tendon Autografts , 2003, The American journal of sports medicine.

[11]  F. Girgis,et al.  The cruciate ligaments of the knee joint. Anatomical, functional and experimental analysis. , 1975, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[12]  Freddie H. Fu,et al.  Biomechanical Analysis of an Anatomic Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction , 2002, The American journal of sports medicine.

[13]  William I. Sterett,et al.  Relationships between Objective Assessment of Ligament Stability and Subjective Assessment of Symptoms and Function after Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction , 2004, The American journal of sports medicine.

[14]  Freddie H. Fu,et al.  The Effectiveness of Reconstruction of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament with Hamstrings and Patellar Tendon: A Cadaveric Study Comparing Anterior Tibial and Rotational Loads , 2002, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.