A Novel Energy-Efficient Contention-Based MAC Protocol Used for OA-UWSN

A hybrid optical-acoustic underwater wireless sensor network (OA-UWSN) was proposed to solve the problem of high-speed transmission of real-time video and images in marine information detection. This paper proposes a novel energy-efficient contention-based media access control (MAC) protocol (OA-CMAC) for the OA-UWSN. Based on optical-acoustic fusion technology, our proposed OA-CMAC combines the postponed access mechanism in carrier sense multiple access with collision avoidance (CSMA/CA) and multiplexing-based spatial division multiple access (SDMA) technology to achieve high-speed and real-time data transmission. The protocol first performs an acoustic handshake to obtain the location information of a transceiver node, ensuring that the channel is idle. Otherwise, it performs postponed access and waits for the next time slot to contend for the channel again. Then, an optical handshake is performed to detect whether the channel condition satisfies the optical transmission, and beam alignment is performed at the same time. Finally, the nodes transmit data using optical communication. If the channel conditions do not meet the requirements for optical communication, a small amount of data with high priority is transmitted through acoustic communication. An evaluation of the proposed MAC protocol was performed with OMNeT++ simulations. The results showed that when the optical handshaking success ratio was greater than 50%, compared to the O-A handshake protocol in the literature, our protocol could result in doubled throughput. Due to the low energy consumption of optical communication, the node’s lifetime is 30% longer than that of pure acoustic communication, greatly reducing the network operation cost. Therefore, it is suitable for large-scale underwater sensor networks with high loads.

[1]  Lingwei Xu,et al.  A MAC protocol design for optical-acoustic hybrid underwater wireless sensor network , 2018 .

[2]  Guangjie Han,et al.  A Stratification-Based Data Collection Scheme in Underwater Acoustic Sensor Networks , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology.

[3]  Damla Turgut,et al.  Path Finding for Maximum Value of Information in Multi-Modal Underwater Wireless Sensor Networks , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing.

[4]  Shengming Jiang,et al.  On Reliable Data Transfer in Underwater Acoustic Networks: A Survey From Networking Perspective , 2018, IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials.

[5]  Nasir Saeed,et al.  Energy Harvesting Hybrid Acoustic-Optical Underwater Wireless Sensor Networks Localization , 2017, Sensors.

[6]  Paolo Casari,et al.  Fair and Throughput-Optimal Routing in Multimodal Underwater Networks , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications.

[7]  Shengming Jiang,et al.  State-of-the-Art Medium Access Control (MAC) Protocols for Underwater Acoustic Networks: A Survey Based on a MAC Reference Model , 2018, IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials.

[8]  Michele Zorzi,et al.  Multimodal Underwater Networks: Recent Advances and a Look Ahead , 2017, WUWNet.

[9]  Ju Liu,et al.  Design of optical-acoustic hybrid underwater wireless sensor network , 2017, J. Netw. Comput. Appl..

[10]  Songzuo Liu,et al.  MIMO-OFDM underwater acoustic communication systems - A review , 2017, Phys. Commun..

[11]  Jawad A. Salehi,et al.  Underwater positioning system based on cellular underwater wireless optical CDMA networks , 2017, 2017 26th Wireless and Optical Communication Conference (WOCC).

[12]  Yuhan Dong,et al.  A Survey of Underwater Optical Wireless Communications , 2017, IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials.

[13]  Hao Zhang,et al.  Performance analysis of IAF relaying mobile D2D cooperative networks , 2017, J. Frankl. Inst..

[14]  Georges Kaddoum,et al.  Underwater Optical Wireless Communication , 2016, IEEE Access.

[15]  Jae Weon Choi,et al.  Sensor localization-based distributed target tracking filter in underwater sensor networks , 2015, 2015 54th Annual Conference of the Society of Instrument and Control Engineers of Japan (SICE).

[16]  Mario Gerla,et al.  Evaluation of underwater optical-acoustic hybrid network , 2014, China Communications.

[17]  Yunsi Fei,et al.  MURAO: A multi-level routing protocol for acoustic-optical hybrid underwater wireless sensor networks , 2012, 2012 9th Annual IEEE Communications Society Conference on Sensor, Mesh and Ad Hoc Communications and Networks (SECON).

[18]  F. Pang,et al.  Analyzing the receiving power of rectilinear mobile/free-space optical links by considering the effect of laser beam divergence and deflection angles , 2012 .

[19]  Marek Doniec,et al.  Autonomous, Localization-Free Underwater Data Muling Using Acoustic and Optical Communication , 2012, ISER.

[20]  Shlomi Arnon,et al.  Non-line-of-sight underwater optical wireless communication network. , 2009, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[21]  Milica Stojanovic,et al.  Underwater acoustic communication channels: Propagation models and statistical characterization , 2009, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[22]  Lu Hong,et al.  A TDMA-Based MAC Protocol in Underwater Sensor Networks , 2008, 2008 4th International Conference on Wireless Communications, Networking and Mobile Computing.

[23]  H. T. Mouftah,et al.  A Dependable Clustering Protocol for Survivable Underwater Sensor Networks , 2008, 2008 IEEE International Conference on Communications.

[24]  John S. Heidemann,et al.  T-Lohi: A New Class of MAC Protocols for Underwater Acoustic Sensor Networks , 2008, IEEE INFOCOM 2008 - The 27th Conference on Computer Communications.

[25]  Hao-Li Wang,et al.  Ordered CSMA: a collision-free MAC protocol for underwater acoustic networks , 2007, OCEANS 2007.

[26]  Vedat Coskun,et al.  Wireless sensor networks for underwater survelliance systems , 2006, Ad Hoc Networks.

[27]  M. Stojanovic,et al.  Slotted FAMA: a MAC protocol for underwater acoustic networks , 2006, OCEANS 2006 - Asia Pacific.

[28]  R. Zimmerman,et al.  Absolute positioning of an autonomous underwater vehicle using GPS and acoustic measurements , 2005, IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering.

[29]  Dario Pompili,et al.  Underwater acoustic sensor networks: research challenges , 2005, Ad Hoc Networks.

[30]  Ian F. Akyildiz,et al.  Wireless sensor networks: a survey , 2002, Comput. Networks.

[31]  Chenyang Feng OPTICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF OPTICAL CHANNALS ON AIRBORNE LASER SOUNDING , 2000 .

[32]  I. Robinson,et al.  The relationship between beam attenuation and chlorophyll concentration and reflectance in Antarctic waters , 1995 .

[33]  L. Prieur,et al.  A three-component model of ocean colour and its application to remote sensing of phytoplankton pigments in coastal waters , 1989 .

[34]  K. S. Shifrin Physical optics of ocean water , 1988 .

[35]  W. Veldkamp,et al.  Compact, collinear, and variable anamorphic-beam compressor design. , 1982, Applied optics.