Wear in the prosthetic shoulder: association with design parameters.

Total replacement of the glenohumeral joint provides an effective means for treating a variety of pathologies of the shoulder. However, several studies indicate that the procedure has not yet been entirely optimized. Loosening of the glenoid component remains the most likely cause of implant failure, and generally this is believed to stem from either mechanical failure of the fixation in response to high tensile stresses, or through osteolysis of the surrounding bone stock in response to particulate wear debris. Many computational studies have considered the potential for the former, although only few have attempted to tackle the latter. Using finite-element analysis an investigation, taking into account contact pressures as well as glenohumeral kinematics, has thus been conducted, to assess the potential for polyethylene wear within the artificial shoulder. The relationships between three different aspects of glenohumeral design and the potential for wear have been considered, these being conformity, polyethylene thickness, and fixation type. The results of the current study indicate that the use of conforming designs are likely to produce slightly elevated amounts of wear debris particles when compared with less conforming joints, but that the latter would be more likely to cause material failure of the polyethylene. The volume of wear debris predicted was highly influenced by the rate of loading, however qualitatively it was found that wear predictions were not influenced by the use of different polyethylene thicknesses nor fixation type while the depth of wearing was. With the thinnest polyethylene designs (2 mm) the maximum depth of the wear scar was seen to be upwards of 20% higher with a metal-backed fixation as opposed to a cemented design. In all-polyethylene designs peak polymethyl methacrylate tensile stresses were seen to reduce with increasing polyethylene thickness. Irrespective of the rate of loading of the shoulder joint, the current study indicates that it is possible to optimize glenoid component design against abrasive wear through the use of high conformity designs, possessing a polyethylene thickness of at least 6 mm.

[1]  M Viceconti,et al.  Material properties assignment to finite element models of bone structures: a new method. , 1999, Medical engineering & physics.

[2]  Gilles Walch,et al.  The Influence of Glenohumeral Prosthetic Mismatch on Glenoid Radiolucent Lines: Results of a Multicenter Study , 2002, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[3]  C. M. Agrawal,et al.  Isolation and characterization of polyethylene wear debris associated with osteolysis following total shoulder arthroplasty. , 1999, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[4]  A. Amis,et al.  The effects of glenoid component alignment variations on cement mantle stresses in total shoulder arthroplasty. , 2004, Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery.

[5]  P J Prendergast,et al.  Contact stresses in the glenoid component in total shoulder arthroplasty , 2003, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine.

[6]  Mark J. Pearcy,et al.  Implant retrieval studies of the wear and loosening of prosthetic joints: a review , 2000 .

[7]  P. Revell,et al.  Biological reaction to debris in relation to joint prostheses , 1997, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine.

[8]  B F Morrey,et al.  Stress analyses of glenoid components in total shoulder arthroplasty. , 1999, Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery.

[9]  D R Pichora,et al.  Shoulder prosthesis subluxation: theory and experiment. , 2000, Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery.

[10]  I C Clarke,et al.  Mechanism and clinical significance of wear debris-induced osteolysis. , 1992, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[11]  Andrew R Hopkins,et al.  Finite element models of total shoulder replacement: Application of boundary conditions , 2005, Computer methods in biomechanics and biomedical engineering.

[12]  M Beaugonin,et al.  Simulation of a knee joint replacement during a gait cycle using explicit finite element analysis. , 2002, Journal of biomechanics.

[13]  P J Prendergast,et al.  Three-dimensional finite element analysis of glenoid replacement prostheses: a comparison of keeled and pegged anchorage systems. , 2000, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[14]  G. Walch,et al.  Cemented polyethylene versus uncemented metal-backed glenoid components in total shoulder arthroplasty: a prospective, double-blind, randomized study. , 2002, Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery.

[15]  Mark Taylor,et al.  Finite element modelling of glenohumeral kinematics following total shoulder arthroplasty. , 2006, Journal of biomechanics.

[16]  J. Saunders,et al.  Observations of the Function of the Shoulder Joint , 1996, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[17]  S H Teoh,et al.  An elasto-plastic finite element model for polyethylene wear in total hip arthroplasty. , 2002, Journal of biomechanics.

[18]  U. Wyss,et al.  Review of arm motion analyses , 2000, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine.

[19]  C. J. Bell,et al.  i) Wear of polyethylene in artificial knee joints , 2001 .

[20]  F A Matsen,et al.  Observations on retrieved polyethylene glenoid components. , 2001, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[21]  Alain Farron,et al.  Influence of glenohumeral conformity on glenoid stresses after total shoulder arthroplasty. , 2006, Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery.

[22]  Thomas D. Brown,et al.  Adaptiive finite element modeling of long‐term polyethylene wear in total hip arthroplasty , 1996 .

[23]  L Ryd,et al.  Wear in retrieved condylar knee arthroplasties. A comparison of wear in different designs of 280 retrieved condylar knee prostheses. , 1997, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[24]  P M Cattaneo,et al.  A three-dimensional finite element model from computed tomography data: A semi-automated method , 2001, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine.

[25]  S. Timoshenko,et al.  Theory of elasticity , 1975 .

[26]  T. McGloughlin,et al.  Wear of ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) in total knee prostheses: A review of key influences , 2000, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine.

[27]  T D Brown,et al.  The Frank Stinchfield Award. 3-Dimensional sliding/contact computational simulation of total hip wear. , 1996, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[28]  T D Brown,et al.  Finite element analysis of acetabular wear. Validation, and backing and fixation effects. , 1997, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[29]  C. Engh,et al.  Radiographic Evaluation of Penetration by the Femoral Head into the Polyethylene Liner over Time* , 1997, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[30]  M Viceconti,et al.  Analysis of titanium induced CT artifacts in the development of biomechanical finite element models. , 1998, Medical engineering & physics.

[31]  I. Learmonth,et al.  Factors contributing to the wear of polyethylene in clinical practice , 1997, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine.

[32]  S. Cowin,et al.  On the dependence of the elasticity and strength of cancellous bone on apparent density. , 1988, Journal of biomechanics.

[33]  J. Archard Contact and Rubbing of Flat Surfaces , 1953 .

[34]  J. Fisher,et al.  Biological reactions to wear debris in total joint replacement , 2000, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine.

[35]  C. V. White,et al.  Simulation of initial frontside and backside wear rates in a modular acetabular component with multiple screw holes. , 1999, Journal of biomechanics.

[36]  Jove Graham,et al.  Retrieved glenoid components: a classification system for surface damage analysis. , 2002, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[37]  K. Johnson Contact Mechanics: Frontmatter , 1985 .

[38]  T. Ilchmann,et al.  Polyethylene wear in Scanhip arthroplasty with a 22 or 32 mm head: 62 matched patients followed for 7-9 years. , 1996, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica.

[39]  D R Pichora,et al.  Glenohumeral contact forces , 2000, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine.

[40]  D. Burr,et al.  Stiffness of compact bone: effects of porosity and density. , 1988, Journal of biomechanics.

[41]  W H Harris,et al.  Comparison of the fatigue characteristics of centrifuged and uncentrifuged simplex P bone cement , 1987, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[42]  F. C. T. Helm,et al.  Analysis of the kinematic and dynamic behavior of the shoulder mechanism , 1994 .

[43]  N. Poppen,et al.  Normal and abnormal motion of the shoulder. , 1976, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[44]  F T Ballmer,et al.  Observations on retrieved glenoid components. , 2003, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[45]  T. Brown,et al.  A sliding-distance-coupled finite element formulation for polyethylene wear in total hip arthroplasty. , 1996, Journal of biomechanics.