Energy Efficiency Analysis of Soft and Hard Cooperative Spectrum Sensing Schemes in Cognitive Radio Networks

Cooperative spectrum sensing (CSS) represents a key factor in the success of cognitive radio networks. CSS implies that users report their local sensing results to a fusion center in order to process them. The two popular reporting schemes are soft and hard schemes. In hard scheme, local sensing result is conveyed by a single bit, whereas the sensing result is reported as it is in the soft scheme. The more detection accuracy attained by soft scheme is confronted by more resource efficiency in hard scheme. This paper provides analytic comparison between both schemes in terms of throughput, energy consumption and energy efficiency. Our work includes deriving the sufficient conditions on the frame length by which the hard scheme outperforms soft scheme for each comparison aspect. Our results show that hard scheme always achieves higher throughput, while, at short frames and large number of users, it consumes less energy and attains higher energy efficiency.

[1]  Fabrizio Granelli,et al.  Novel energy-efficient reporting scheme for spectrum sensing results in cognitive radio , 2013, 2013 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC).

[2]  Mohamed-Slim Alouini,et al.  On the Energy Detection of Unknown Signals Over Fading Channels , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Communications.

[3]  Fortunato Santucci,et al.  Cooperative Spectrum Sensing over Correlated Log-Normal Sensing and Reporting Channels , 2009, GLOBECOM 2009 - 2009 IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference.

[4]  Rodney S. Tucker,et al.  Energy consumption in wired and wireless access networks , 2011, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[5]  Wang Wenbo,et al.  Energy-Efficient Cooperative Spectrum Sensing in Cognitive Radio Networks , 2010 .

[6]  Sundeep Prabhakar Chepuri,et al.  Energy and throughput efficient strategies for cooperative spectrum sensing in cognitive radios , 2011, 2011 IEEE 12th International Workshop on Signal Processing Advances in Wireless Communications.

[7]  Yuanan Liu,et al.  Soft versus hard cooperative energy detection under low SNR , 2008, 2008 Third International Conference on Communications and Networking in China.

[8]  H. Vincent Poor,et al.  Cooperative Sensing With Imperfect Reporting Channels: Hard Decisions or Soft Decisions? , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[9]  E. Visotsky,et al.  On collaborative detection of TV transmissions in support of dynamic spectrum sharing , 2005, First IEEE International Symposium on New Frontiers in Dynamic Spectrum Access Networks, 2005. DySPAN 2005..

[10]  Anant Sahai,et al.  Cooperative Sensing among Cognitive Radios , 2006, 2006 IEEE International Conference on Communications.

[11]  I. S. Gradshteyn,et al.  Table of Integrals, Series, and Products , 1976 .

[12]  Fabrizio Granelli,et al.  Performance Optimisation of Soft and Hard Spectrum Sensing Schemes in Cognitive Radio , 2012, IEEE Communications Letters.

[13]  Simon Haykin,et al.  Cognitive radio: brain-empowered wireless communications , 2005, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications.

[14]  Ian F. Akyildiz,et al.  Optimal spectrum sensing framework for cognitive radio networks , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications.

[15]  A. Ghasemi,et al.  Collaborative spectrum sensing for opportunistic access in fading environments , 2005, First IEEE International Symposium on New Frontiers in Dynamic Spectrum Access Networks, 2005. DySPAN 2005..

[16]  Albert H. Nuttall,et al.  Some integrals involving the QM function (Corresp.) , 1975, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.