Case studies of learning objects used in school settings

The purpose of this study was to investigate the role and characteristics of virtual learning objects in selected classroom cases. Four Finnish cases represented such pedagogical approaches as student‐centeredness, process orientation and collaborative inquiry. The case study approach enabled the investigation of concrete practices in using learning objects in ordinary classroom settings. The goal of the study was to examine the interrelatedness of the teachers’ pedagogical practices with characteristics and affordances of the learning objects, in order to understand how learning objects can support the development of advanced pedagogical practices in schools. The data used were qualitative, consisting of the participating teachers’ agendas, and observations and video recordings during classroom sessions. The results indicate that the learning objects were mostly used as exploration tools, information sources, assessment models and objects of discussion. An expert‐like use of knowledge was characteristic in the pedagogical settings, especially when the teacher was experienced in using ICT in teaching. However, not all the learning objects supported such practices, thus preventing a teacher from reaching intended pedagogical aims.

[1]  Jennifer Preece,et al.  Predicting quality in educational software: Evaluating For Learning, Usability and the Synergy between Them , 1999, Interact. Comput..

[2]  Sue Cobb,et al.  Key lessons for the design and integration of virtual environments in secondary science , 2002, Comput. Educ..

[3]  Ed Smeets,et al.  Does ICT contribute to powerful learning environments in primary education? , 2005, Comput. Educ..

[4]  Nancy Law,et al.  Practice characteristics that lead to 21st century learning outcomes , 2002, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[5]  C. Coll,et al.  What in the World Happens in Classrooms? Qualitative Classroom Research , 2004 .

[6]  Gavriel Salomon,et al.  Technology and pedagogy: Why don't we see the promised revolution? , 2002 .

[7]  Mark Windschitl,et al.  The WWW and Classroom Research: What Path Should We Take?. , 1998 .

[8]  R. Kozma The material features of multiple representations and their cognitive and social affordances for science understanding , 2003 .

[9]  Betty Collis,et al.  New Pedagogies and Re-Usable Learning Objects: Toward a New Economy in Education , 2001 .

[10]  J. Schofield Computers and classroom culture , 1995 .

[11]  R. Watson Advanced Research Methods in Psychology , 2003 .

[12]  M. Scardamalia Collective cognitive responsibility for the advancement of knowledge , 2002 .

[13]  J. Gibson The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception , 1979 .

[14]  Jan Herrington,et al.  Exploring Technology-Mediated Learning from a Pedagogical Perspective , 2003, Interact. Learn. Environ..

[15]  Cher Ping Lim,et al.  “Those Who Can, Teach” ‐ The Pivotal Role of the Teacher in the Information and Communication Technologies (ICT) Learning Environment , 2002 .

[16]  Susan Gibson,et al.  Visions and realities of Internet use in schools: Canadian perspectives , 2004, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[17]  Carl Bereiter,et al.  Education and Mind in the Knowledge Age , 2002 .

[18]  Z. Todd,et al.  Mixing methods in psychology : the integration of qualitative and quantitative methods in theory and practice , 2004 .

[19]  Rafi Nachmias,et al.  Web-Based Learning Environments , 2000 .

[20]  M. Windschitl Research News And Comment: The WWW and Classroom Research: What Path Should We Take? , 1998 .

[21]  Malcolm Correll,et al.  A+ for Teaching , 1962 .

[22]  Erno Lehtinen,et al.  Principles , models and examples for designing learning objects ( LOs ) Pedagogical guidelines in CELEBRATE , 2004 .

[23]  David Wiley,et al.  Connecting learning objects to instructional design theory: A definition, a metaphor, and a taxonomy , 2000 .

[24]  E. Reed The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception , 1989 .

[25]  K. Hakkarainen,et al.  The Knowledge Creation Metaphor – An Emergent Epistemological Approach to Learning , 2005 .