The Perceived Benefits of 6-Degree-Separation Social Networks

Purpose – This research seeks to focus on the benefits of social networking service (SNS) based on the principle of six degrees of separation. Since the inception of web 2.0, the popularity of social networks (SNS) has continued to increase. Some SNS are based on six degrees of separation (6SNS), and these have emerged as the most frequently visited WWW sites.Design/methodology/approach – Using a randomized control group pre‐test‐post‐test experimental design, responses to a questionnaire to test the differences among 6SNS users and non‐users on 12 issues of benefit were analyzed.Findings – The tests show, first, that, compared with traditional virtual communities, SNS evoke higher ratings for “trust in website,” “trust in other members,” and “quality of friends.” Second, SNS can provide users with entertainment and greater social involvement. People who use these sites express positive attitudes about them. Third, no significant differences were found between SNS and traditional internet media on “meetin...

[1]  W. Galston.  Trust: The Social Virtues and the Creation of Prosperity , 1996 .

[2]  Dimitrina S. Dimitrova,et al.  Computer Networks as Social Networks: Collaborative Work, Telework, and Virtual Community , 1996 .

[3]  Cliff Lampe,et al.  The Benefits of Facebook "Friends: " Social Capital and College Students' Use of Online Social Network Sites , 2007, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[4]  A. Rubin,et al.  Predictors of Internet Use , 2000 .

[5]  H. Kaiser.  An index of factorial simplicity , 1974 .

[6]  Alessandro Acquisti,et al.  Information revelation and privacy in online social networks , 2005, WPES '05.

[7]  Sirkka L. Jarvenpaa,et al.  Communication and Trust in Global Virtual Teams , 1999 .

[8]  Morten T. Hansen,et al.  KNOWLEDGE SHARING IN ORGANIZATIONS: MULTIPLE NETWORKS, MULTIPLE PHASES , 2005 .

[9]  Cliff Lampe,et al.  A face(book) in the crowd: social Searching vs. social browsing , 2006, CSCW '06.

[10]  B. Wellman.  The Community Question: The Intimate Networks of East Yorkers , 1979, American Journal of Sociology.

[11]  Katelyn Y. A. McKenna,et al.  Can you see the real me? Activation and expression of the "true self" on the Internet. , 2002 .

[12]  L. Berkman,et al.  Social networks, host resistance, and mortality: a nine-year follow-up study of Alameda County residents. , 1979, American journal of epidemiology.

[13]  Sharon L. Milgram,et al.  The Small World Problem , 1967 .

[14]  Tim Chester.  Will you be my Facebook Friend , 2013 .

[15]  Albert H. Segars,et al.  Assessing the unidimensionality of measurement : a paradigm and illustration within the context of information systems research , 1997 .

[16]  Mark S. Granovetter.  The Strength of Weak Ties , 1973, American Journal of Sociology.

[17]  I. Ajzen,et al.  Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research , 1977 .

[18]  Joseph Zubin,et al.  Fundamental statistics in psychology and education , 1943 .

[19]  Mart G.M. van der Poel,et al.  Delineating personal support networks , 1993 .

[20]  S. Syme,et al.  Social support and health. , 1986 .

[21]  Danah Boyd,et al.  Social Network Sites: Definition, History, and Scholarship , 2007, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[22]  C. Fischer,et al.  To Dwell among Friends: Personal Networks in Town and City. , 1984 .

[23]  J. A. Barnes.  Class and Committees in a Norwegian Island Parish , 1954 .

[24]  Robert D. Putnam,et al.  Bowling alone: the collapse and revival of American community , 2000, CSCW '00.

[25]  António Lucas Soares,et al.  Improving the quality of collaboration requirements for information management through social networks analysis , 2007, Int. J. Inf. Manag..

[26]  N. Nie,et al.  Internet and society: a preliminary report , 2001 .

[27]  Shu-Chen Yang,et al.  International Journal of Information Management Social Capital, Behavioural Control, and Tacit Knowledge Sharing—a Multi-informant Design , 2022 .

[28]  C. Fornell,et al.  Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. , 1981 .

[29]  Caroline Haythornthwaite,et al.  Social networks and Internet connectivity effects , 2005 .

[30]  Thomas Ashby Wills,et al.  Supportive functions of interpersonal relationships. , 1985 .

[31]  M. Kochen,et al.  Contacts and influence , 1978 .

[32]  Ian Murray.  Public access to the Internet in public libraries , 1998 .

[33]  Fred D. Davis.  Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology , 1989, MIS Q..

[34]  Morten T. Hansen,et al.  The Search-Transfer Problem: The Role of Weak Ties in Sharing Knowledge across Organization Subunits , 1999 .

[35]  Andrew J. Flanagin.  IM Online: Instant Messaging Use Among College Students , 2005 .

[36]  R. Putman.  Bowling alone: the collapse and revival of american community, NY: Simon and Shuster, 2000, 541 p. , 2002 .

[37]  Malcolm R. Parks.  Making Friends in Cyberspace , 1996, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[38]  Gustavo S. Mesch,et al.  The Quality of Online and Offline Relationships: The Role of Multiplexity and Duration of Social Relationships , 2006, Inf. Soc..

[39]  Nicole B. Ellison,et al.  Managing Impressions Online: Self-Presentation Processes in the Online Dating Environment , 2006, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[40]  Keith N. Hampton,et al.  Does the Internet Increase, Decrease, or Supplement Social Capital? , 2001 .

[41]  Mario R Ortiz.  Everything is Different, Nothing is Changed , 2013, Nursing science quarterly.

[42]  Jure Leskovec,et al.  Planetary-scale views on a large instant-messaging network , 2008, WWW.

[43]  P. Thoits.  Conceptual, methodological, and theoretical problems in studying social support as a buffer against life stress. , 1982, Journal of health and social behavior.

[44]  J. Lewis,et al.  Trust as a Social Reality , 1985 .

[45]  James H. Keller,et al.  Public Access to the Internet , 1995 .

[46]  M. Hammer,et al.  'Core' and 'extended' social networks in relation to health and illness. , 1983, Social science & medicine.

[47]  Judith Donath,et al.  Public Displays of Connection , 2004 .

[48]  Katelyn Y. A. McKenna,et al.  Virtual group dynamics. , 2002 .

[49]  Catherine Dwyer,et al.  Digital Relationships in the "MySpace" Generation: Results From a Qualitative Study , 2007, 2007 40th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS'07).

[50]  J. Guilford.  Fundamental statistics in psychology and education , 1943 .

[51]  Robert E. Kraut,et al.  Internet paradox. A social technology that reduces social involvement and psychological well-being? , 1998, The American psychologist.

[52]  Jonathon N. Cummings,et al.  The quality of online social relationships , 2002, CACM.

[53]  E. Paul,et al.  Friendsickness in the Transition to College: Precollege Predictors and College Adjustment Correlates. , 2001 .

[54]  A. Lenhart,et al.  Teens, privacy and online social networks: How teens manage their online identities and personal information in the age of MySpace , 2007 .

[55]  Daniel Z. Levin,et al.  The Strength of Weak Ties You Can Trust: The Mediating Role of Trust in Effective Knowledge Transfer , 2004, Manag. Sci..

[56]  G. C. Homans,et al.  Social Behavior as Exchange , 1958, American Journal of Sociology.

[57]  R. LaRose,et al.  A Social Cognitive Theory of Internet Uses and Gratifications: Toward a New Model of Media Attendance , 2004 .

[58]  N.W. Coppola,et al.  Building trust in virtual teams , 2001, IPCC 2001. Communication Dimensions. Proceedings IEEE International Professional Communication Conference (Cat. No.01CH37271).

[59]  Bruce Schneier,et al.  Architecture of Privacy , 2009, IEEE Security & Privacy Magazine.