Assessing context‐based learning: not only rigorous but also relevant

Economic factors are driving significant change in higher education. There is increasing responsiveness to market demand for vocational courses and a growing appreciation of the importance of procedural (tacit) knowledge to service the needs of the Knowledge Economy; the skills in demand are information analysis, collaborative working and ‘just‐in‐time learning’. New pedagogical methods go some way to accommodate these skills, situating learning in context and employing information and communications technology to present realistic simulations and facilitate collaborative exchange. However, what have so far proved resistant to change are the practices of assessment. This paper endorses the case for a scholarship of assessment and proposes the development of technology‐supported tools and techniques to assess context‐based learning. It also recommends a fundamental rethink of the norm‐referenced and summative assessment of propositional knowledge as the principal criterion for student success in universities.

[1]  Peter Scott,et al.  The Globalization of Higher Education , 2005 .

[2]  S. de Freitas,et al.  Personalizing Learning in the 21st Century , 2005 .

[3]  E. Mansfield,et al.  The Production and Distribution of Knowledge in the United States. , 1963 .

[4]  Linda D. Brown,et al.  Internet Plagiarism: Developing Strategies to Curb Student Academic Dishonesty , 1999, Internet High. Educ..

[5]  David W. Shaffer,et al.  Epistemic frames for epistemic games , 2006, Comput. Educ..

[6]  M. Taras,et al.  Using Assessment for Learning and Learning from Assessment , 2002 .

[7]  Earl J. McGrath.  The Future of General Education , 1953 .

[8]  M. Tomlinson.  The learning economy and embodied knowledge flows in Great Britain , 1999 .

[9]  Nelson R. Kellogg,et al.  The Work of Nations: Preparing Ourselves for 21st-Century Capitalism by Robert B. Reich (review) , 1993, Technology and Culture.

[10]  Helen Peters,et al.  Contested discourses: assessing the outcomes of learning from experience for the award of credit in higher education , 2005 .

[11]  David Baume,et al.  What is happening when we assess, and how can we use our understanding of this to improve assessment? , 2004 .

[12]  Alistair Campbell,et al.  Application of ICT and rubrics to the assessment process where professional judgement is involved: the features of an e‐marking tool , 2005 .

[13]  Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development,et al.  Organisation for economic cooperation and development , 1998 .

[14]  L. Elton,et al.  Assessment in universities: a critical review of research , 2002 .

[15]  F. Coffield.  The necessity of Informal learning , 2000 .

[16]  David Hamilton,et al.  Teaching in the knowledge society: education in the age of insecurity , 2003 .

[17]  Louise Moran,et al.  Flexible learning and university change , 2002 .

[18]  M. Birenbaum.  Assessment 2000: Towards a Pluralistic Approach to Assessment , 1996 .

[19]  Gráinne Conole,et al.  Reusing Online Resources: A Sustainable Approach to eLearning , 2003 .

[20]  Peter Scott,et al.  The future of general education in mass higher education systems , 2002 .

[21]  J. Jordan,et al.  The Use of the Case Method in Large and Diverse Undergraduate Business Programmes: Problems and Issues , 2000 .

[22]  D. Schoen,et al.  The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action , 1985 .

[23]  Sanjaya Mishra,et al.  Reusing Online Resources: A sustainable approach to e-learning , 2004 .

[24]  Joanna Bull,et al.  Assessing student learning in higher education , 1997 .

[25]  Terry L. Weech.  MERLOT: Multimedia Educational Resource for Learning and Online Teaching , 2002 .

[26]  M. Price,et al.  Assessment standards: the role of communities of practice and the scholarship of assessment , 2005 .

[27]  R. J. Bogumil,et al.  The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action , 1985, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[28]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation , 1991 .

[29]  E. Maclellan,et al.  How convincing is alternative assessment for use in higher education , 2004 .

[30]  D. Nicol,et al.  Formative assessment and self‐regulated learning: a model and seven principles of good feedback practice , 2006 .

[31]  A. Elzinga.  The New Production of Knowledge. The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies , 1997 .

[32]  Chris J. Park,et al.  In Other (People's) Words: Plagiarism by university students--literature and lessons , 2003 .

[33]  D. Royce Sadler,et al.  Interpretations of criteria‐based assessment and grading in higher education , 2005 .

[34]  Paul Shrivastava,et al.  The Work of Nations: Preparing Ourselves for 21st-Century Capitalism , 1994 .

[35]  Frank Coffield,et al.  Higher education in a learning society , 1995 .

[36]  Maeve Paris.  Simulation authoring tools for interactive e-learning courseware development , 2003 .

[37]  Hannah Green,et al.  Their Space. Education for a Digital Generation , 2007 .

[38]  E. Carnell,et al.  Portfolios for learning, assessment and professional development in higher education , 2006 .

[39]  Phil Nanlohy,et al.  Digital portfolios: fact or fashion? , 2004 .

[40]  Wolffried Stucky,et al.  RETRIEVING CONTENT WITH AGENTS IN WEB SERVICE E-LEARNING SYSTEMS , 2004 .

[41]  Weblog Wikipedia,et al.  In Wikipedia the Free Encyclopedia , 2005 .

[42]  S. Schwartzman,et al.  The New Production of Knowledge: The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies , 1994 .

[43]  Tim O'Reilly,et al.  What is Web 2.0: Design Patterns and Business Models for the Next Generation of Software , 2007 .

[44]  James J. Duderstadt,et al.  The Globalization of Higher Education , 2008 .

[45]  D. Boud.  Sustainable Assessment: Rethinking assessment for the learning society , 2000 .

[46]  Ken Ducatel,et al.  Learning and Skills in the Knowledge Economy , 1998 .