Application of System Identification (SI) to Full--Wave Time Domain Characterization of Microwave and Millimeter Wave Passive Structures

Numerical time–domain methods for electromagnetic field simulations typically provide very broad band frequency–domain characterizations as well as transient response with a single simulation and without in general requiring any pre–processing. However long simulation times and large memory requirements arise for the case of electromagnetic structures characterized by low loss (high quality factor) and high aspect ratios (complex three– dimensional structures), since the first yields long transient responses and the second small time discretization intervals. Passive network impulse responses can be characterized by the singularity expansion method theory, implying that they can be efficiently described by means of exponentially damped oscillating components corresponding to the network natural frequencies. In principle, the entire time behavior of an electromagnetic structure can therefore be predicted from a few time samples by applying high resolution parametric model estimation techniques, based on system identification (SI) methods. These methods allow the determination of the network equivalent model directly from the simulated results. The number of a model’s parameters, also called model order, and the parameters themselves, typically represented by complex natural frequencies or poles, significantly effect this methodology since they are indicators of the complexity and the accuracy of the model respectively. Once correctly identified these parametric analytical descriptions can replace more cumbersome and demanding full–wave numerical models, in network level (SPICE like) simulators, enabling a much faster analysis. Although SI techniques are a quite well known topic in electromagnetic numerical applications, a systematic and effi- cient approach is still missing. The aim of the present work is to develop an improved approach first, by re-examining the theoretical background of the network oriented modelling (NOM) in order to justify the use of a poles series model (Prony model) as the more obvious choice for describing passive electromagnetic structures, and second by reviewing some of the most common and efficient SI techniques for the model order selection and model parameters estimation. The intention is to formulate an algorithm that allows for entire network modelling to be carried out in a completely autonomous and automatic fashion. The methodology is to estimate the model’s parameters from the time–domain responses generated by means of a full–wave analysis, be it the Transmission Line Matrix (TLM) method or the finite difference time–domain (FDTD) method, and by adaptively refining them, fit the model recovered responses, to the numerically simulated ones. This algorithm runs in parallel with a full-wave analysis which is discontinued as soon as the model accuracy becomes satisfactory. In this way a time demanding numerical simulation may be reduced by one order of dimension. Since the model taken in consideration is Prony’s and the parameter estimation procedures are Prony based, the algorithm is called Prony Model based System Identification (PMSI). Once the network responses are available they may be used for identifying the network natural frequencies of the impedance (admittance) Foster representation, enabling the direct implementation of the corresponding lumped element equivalent circuit. Since the Foster representation for the impedance (admittance) is practically a Prony model this operation may be carried out again by means of the PMSI algorithm.

[1]  V. Kroupa,et al.  Digital spectral analysis , 1983, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[2]  A. Ruehli,et al.  Circuit models for three-dimensional geometries including dielectrics , 1992 .

[3]  Tapan K. Sarkar,et al.  A Generalized Approach to Direction Finding , 1986, MILCOM 1986 - IEEE Military Communications Conference: Communications-Computers: Teamed for the 90's.

[4]  Vitali Chtchekatourov,et al.  Direct Y-parameter Estimation of Microwave Structures Using TLM Simulation and Prony-s Method , 2001 .

[5]  Bart De Moor,et al.  The singular value decomposition and long and short spaces of noisy matrices , 1993, IEEE Trans. Signal Process..

[6]  The Electrical Oscillations of a Prolate Spheroid. Paper I , 1938 .

[7]  V. Belevitch,et al.  Classical network theory , 1968 .

[8]  A. Ruehli Equivalent Circuit Models for Three-Dimensional Multiconductor Systems , 1974 .

[9]  Li Zhao,et al.  Electromagnetic model order reduction for system-level modeling , 1999 .

[10]  John L. Prince,et al.  Improved global rational approximation macromodeling algorithm for networks characterized by frequency-sampled data , 2000 .

[11]  R. Kumaresan,et al.  Estimating the parameters of exponentially damped sinusoids and pole-zero modeling in noise , 1982 .

[12]  Albert E. Ruehli,et al.  Enhanced skin effect for partial-element equivalent-circuit (PEEC) models , 2000 .

[13]  R. Kashyap Inconsistency of the AIC rule for estimating the order of autoregressive models , 1980 .

[14]  V. Jain Filter analysis by use of pencil of functions: Part II , 1974 .

[15]  H. Akaike A new look at the statistical model identification , 1974 .

[16]  L. Felsen,et al.  Electromagnetic field representations and computations in complex structures III: network representations of the connection and subdomain circuits , 2002 .

[17]  Ieee Antennas,et al.  Electromagnetics: History, Theory, and Applications , 1993 .

[18]  A. Ishimaru Electromagnetic Wave Propagation, Radiation, and Scattering , 1990 .

[19]  John W. Bandler,et al.  Space mapping technique for electromagnetic optimization , 1994 .

[20]  C. Christopoulos,et al.  Solving electromagnetic field problems using a multiple grid transmission-line modeling method , 1994 .

[21]  C. Christopoulos,et al.  The Transmission-line Modeling Method: TLM , 1995, IEEE Antennas and Propagation Magazine.

[22]  J. Rissanen A UNIVERSAL PRIOR FOR INTEGERS AND ESTIMATION BY MINIMUM DESCRIPTION LENGTH , 1983 .

[23]  J. Makhoul,et al.  Linear prediction: A tutorial review , 1975, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[24]  On the theory of discrete TLM Green's functions in three-dimensional TLM , 1995 .

[25]  T. Itoh Numerical techniques for microwave and millimeter-wave passive structures , 1989 .

[26]  Allen Taflove,et al.  Computational Electrodynamics the Finite-Difference Time-Domain Method , 1995 .

[27]  W.J.R. Hoefer,et al.  Autoregressive (AR) and autoregressive moving average (ARMA) spectral estimation techniques for faster TLM analysis of microwave structures , 1994 .

[29]  Thomas Kailath,et al.  ESPRIT-estimation of signal parameters via rotational invariance techniques , 1989, IEEE Trans. Acoust. Speech Signal Process..

[30]  Kyutae Lim,et al.  Design of compact stacked-patch antennas on LTCC technology for wireless communication applications , 2002, IEEE Antennas and Propagation Society International Symposium (IEEE Cat. No.02CH37313).

[31]  Tapan K. Sarkar,et al.  Matrix pencil method for estimating parameters of exponentially damped/undamped sinusoids in noise , 1990, IEEE Trans. Acoust. Speech Signal Process..

[32]  N. Fache,et al.  Automatic derivation of equivalent circuits for general microstrip interconnection discontinuities , 1996 .

[33]  Ban Leong Ooi,et al.  A fast PEEC technique for full-wave parameters extraction of distributed elements , 2001, IEEE Microwave and Wireless Components Letters.

[34]  W. Ross Stone An Introduction to the use of ModelBased Parameter Estimation in Electromagnetics , 1999 .

[35]  P. Russer,et al.  A field theoretical comparison of FDTD and TLM , 1995 .

[36]  E. A. S Guillemin,et al.  Synthesis of Passive Networks , 1957 .

[37]  Peter Russer,et al.  The Transmission Line Matrix Method , 2000 .

[38]  Peter Russer,et al.  Full-wave modeling and automatic equivalent-circuit generation of millimeter-wave planar and multila , 1999 .

[39]  Lennart Ljung,et al.  System Identification: Theory for the User , 1987 .

[40]  Carl E. Baum,et al.  The singularity expansion method and its application to target identification , 1991, Proc. IEEE.

[41]  R. Collin Field theory of guided waves , 1960 .

[42]  G. Lothian,et al.  Spectral Analysis , 1971, Nature.

[43]  H. Akaike Power spectrum estimation through autoregressive model fitting , 1969 .

[44]  R. F. Milsom,et al.  Efficient SPICE-compatible electromagnetic model of arbitrarily shaped integrated passive structure , 1999 .

[45]  P. M. van den Berg,et al.  A modified Lanczos algorithm for the computation of transient electromagnetic wavefields , 1997 .

[46]  Tom Dhaene,et al.  Adaptive CAD-model building algorithm for general planar microwave structures , 1999 .

[47]  K. Yee Numerical solution of initial boundary value problems involving maxwell's equations in isotropic media , 1966 .

[48]  R. Spence,et al.  Tellegen's theorem and electrical networks , 1970 .

[49]  D. Rhodes,et al.  A reactance theorem , 1977, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[50]  J. Swinburne Electromagnetic Theory , 1894, Nature.

[51]  Thomas Kailath,et al.  ESPRIT-A subspace rotation approach to estimation of parameters of cisoids in noise , 1986, IEEE Trans. Acoust. Speech Signal Process..

[52]  Roger F. Harrington,et al.  Field computation by moment methods , 1968 .

[53]  J. Cadzow Maximum Entropy Spectral Analysis , 2006 .

[54]  A. Baev,et al.  Ultra wideband radar target discrimination using the signatures algorithm , 2003, 33rd European Microwave Conference Proceedings (IEEE Cat. No.03EX723C).

[55]  Peter Russer,et al.  Lumped element equivalent circuit parameter extraction of distributed microwave circuits via TLM simulation , 1994, 1994 IEEE MTT-S International Microwave Symposium Digest (Cat. No.94CH3389-4).

[56]  Wolfgang J. R. Hoefer,et al.  The Transmission-Line Matrix Method--Theory and Applications , 1985 .

[57]  T. Ulrych,et al.  Time series modeling and maximum entropy , 1976 .

[58]  A. W. M. van den Enden,et al.  Discrete Time Signal Processing , 1989 .

[59]  Peter B. Johns,et al.  Numerical solution of 2-dimensional scattering problems using a transmission-line matrix , 1971 .

[60]  Carl E. Baum,et al.  On the Singularity Expansion Method for the Solution of Electromagnetic Interaction Problems , 1971 .

[61]  Peter Russer,et al.  Electromagnetic field representations and computations in complex structures I: complexity architecture and generalized network formulation , 2002 .

[62]  Lawrence T. Pileggi,et al.  PRIMA: passive reduced-order interconnect macromodeling algorithm , 1998, 1997 Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Computer Aided Design (ICCAD).

[63]  J. Rebel On the Foundations of the Transmission Line Matrix Method , 2000 .

[64]  P. Russer,et al.  Analysis of N-furcation in elliptical waveguides via the generalized network formulation , 1999, 1999 IEEE MTT-S International Microwave Symposium Digest (Cat. No.99CH36282).

[65]  William H. Press,et al.  The Art of Scientific Computing Second Edition , 1998 .

[66]  W.J.R. Hoefer,et al.  An alternative way of computing S-parameters via impulsive TLM analysis without using absorbing boundary conditions , 1995, Proceedings of 1995 IEEE MTT-S International Microwave Symposium.

[67]  M. Tentzeris,et al.  Comparison of electromagnetic solvers for the analysis of LTCC components , 2003, IEEE Antennas and Propagation Society International Symposium. Digest. Held in conjunction with: USNC/CNC/URSI North American Radio Sci. Meeting (Cat. No.03CH37450).

[68]  Peter Russer,et al.  Electromagnetics, Microwave Circuit, And Antenna Design for Communications Engineering, Second Edition (Artech House Antennas and Propagation Library) , 2006 .

[69]  R. Kumaresan,et al.  Estimation of frequencies of multiple sinusoids: Making linear prediction perform like maximum likelihood , 1982, Proceedings of the IEEE.