The Self-Expressiveness of Footprints: Understanding the Drivers of Check-in

Drawing from the Dramaturgical theory (Goffman, 1959), present study contributes to propose a conceptual model that illuminate the underlying psychological mechanism which faciliate individual’s check-in behavior. Goffman (1959) posits that “impression management” impacts the self presentation of individuals, indicating that individuals adopt deliberate decisions to reveal particular aspects of the self. Past studies emphasize on the privacy issue that impacts location sharing (Barkhuus et al., 2008), while present study highlights that socially driven factors portrays a more comprehensive story that disclose the antecedenting drivers of check-in.This contributes in providing a framework to the previous sporadic studies concerning social motives in check-in literatures. Specifically, the findings support the view that individual’s public self-consciousness and peer influence, compelled by desirable self-presentation leads to involvment in check-in. This finding extends past researches in identifying two dimensions that drive check-in involvement. Furthermore, the results of this study confirm that driven by psychological proximity, a positive relationship is created between check-in involvement and place attachment, which in turn faciliates continual check-in behavioral intentions and the advocation of check-in.

[1]  K. Jones,et al.  Employee performance cues in a hotel service environment: Influence on perceived service quality, value, and word-of-mouth intentions , 1996 .

[2]  Daniel R. Williams,et al.  The Measurement of Place Attachment: Validity and Generalizability of a Psychometric Approach , 2003, Forest Science.

[3]  H. E. Krugman THE MEASUREMENT OF ADVERTISING INVOLVEMENT , 1966 .

[4]  John Zimmerman,et al.  I'm the mayor of my house: examining why people use foursquare - a social-driven location sharing application , 2011, CHI.

[5]  M. Giuliani,et al.  Place attachment in a developmental and cultural context , 1993 .

[6]  M. Scheier,et al.  Public and private self-consciousness: Assessment and theory. , 1975 .

[7]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  Information Technology Adoption Across Time: A Cross-Sectional Comparison of Pre-Adoption and Post-Adoption Beliefs , 1999, MIS Q..

[8]  A. Greenwald,et al.  Audience Involvement in Advertising: Four Levels , 1984 .

[9]  P. Bentler,et al.  Significance Tests and Goodness of Fit in the Analysis of Covariance Structures , 1980 .

[10]  Norman M. Sadeh,et al.  Rethinking location sharing: exploring the implications of social-driven vs. purpose-driven location sharing , 2010, UbiComp.

[11]  Christian S. Jensen,et al.  Location-Related Privacy in Geo-Social Networks , 2011, IEEE Internet Computing.

[12]  Gregory D. Abowd,et al.  Developing privacy guidelines for social location disclosure applications and services , 2005, SOUPS '05.

[13]  Anind K. Dey,et al.  Who wants to know what when? privacy preference determinants in ubiquitous computing , 2003, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[14]  James C. Anderson,et al.  STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING IN PRACTICE: A REVIEW AND RECOMMENDED TWO-STEP APPROACH , 1988 .

[15]  Cecilia Mascolo,et al.  Socio-Spatial Properties of Online Location-Based Social Networks , 2011, ICWSM.

[16]  Henriette Cramer,et al.  Gamification and location-sharing: some emerging social conflicts , 2011 .

[17]  Alex S. Taylor,et al.  Locating Family Values: A Field Trial of the Whereabouts Clock , 2007, UbiComp.

[18]  J. L. Pierce,et al.  Toward a Theory of Psychological Ownership in Organizations , 2001 .

[19]  B. Nordenstam When communities say NIMBY to their LULUs : factors influencing environmental and social impact perception , 1994 .

[20]  R. Stedman Toward a Social Psychology of Place , 2002 .

[21]  E. Goffman The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life , 1959 .

[22]  A. Joinson Self‐disclosure in computer‐mediated communication: The role of self‐awareness and visual anonymity , 2001 .

[23]  Matthew Chalmers,et al.  From awareness to repartee: sharing location within social groups , 2008, CHI.

[24]  Peter A. Todd,et al.  Understanding Information Technology Usage: A Test of Competing Models , 1995, Inf. Syst. Res..

[25]  A. Adam Whatever happened to information systems ethics? Caught between the devil and the deep blue sea , 2004 .

[26]  Lauren Wood 技術解説 IEEE Internet Computing , 1999 .

[27]  J. L. Pierce,et al.  The State of Psychological Ownership: Integrating and Extending a Century of Research , 2003 .

[28]  Jason I. Hong,et al.  Field Deployment of IMBuddy : A Study of Privacy Control and Feedback Mechanisms for Contextual IM , 2007, UbiComp.

[29]  J. Zaichkowsky Measuring the Involvement Construct , 1985 .

[30]  C. Goodwin,et al.  Consumer responses to service failures: Influence of procedural and interactional fairness perceptions , 1992 .

[31]  J. Vaske,et al.  Place Attachment and Environmentally Responsible Behavior , 2001 .

[32]  B. Berry Marketing Communications in a Digital Age , 2012 .