Asymmetric low back loading in asymmetric lifting movements is not prevented by pelvic twist.

Asymmetric lifting is associated with an increased risk of low back disorders. Especially in lifting movements, characterized by a small amount of asymmetry, it is still the question if asymmetric lumbosacral torques occur, or if subjects try to avoid asymmetric back loading by twisting their pelvis with respect to the feet. An increase of the lifting speed or the box weight might amplify the lumbar torques but might also result in an attempt to limit further increase of asymmetric torques by increasing pelvic twist. In the current study, asymmetrical lifting movements were analyzed with the aid of a 3D linked segment model, using cuffs mounted to the body segments. Eight subjects performed lifting movements with five different asymmetry conditions, ranging from 0 to 90 degrees lifting asymmetry with respect to the sagittal plane, using two lifting speeds and two box weights. A significant increase in lateral flexing and twisting low back torque was found for each increase in asymmetry of the lifting movement. Pelvic twist accounted more or less constantly for about 25% of the lifting asymmetry and was hardly influenced by lifting speed or box weight. Even for 10 or 30 degrees of lifting asymmetry, subjects did not twist their pelvis far enough to avoid asymmetric loading of the low back. Assuming that asymmetric loading of the low back is more strenuous to the spine than symmetric loading, the current results indicate that even small deviations of a lifting movement from the sagittal plane can explain an increased risk of low back disorders.

[1]  W S Marras,et al.  A Comprehensive Evaluation of Trunk Response to Asymmetric Trunk Motion , 1992, Spine.

[2]  M. Nordin,et al.  1988 Volvo Award in Biomechanics: The Triaxial Coupling of Torque Generation of Trunk Muscles during Isometric Exertions and the Effect of Fatiguing Isoinertial Movements on the Motor Output and Movement Patterns , 1988, Spine.

[3]  M Gagnon,et al.  The influence of dynamic factors on triaxial net muscular moments at the L5/S1 joint during asymmetrical lifting and lowering. , 1992, Journal of biomechanics.

[4]  A Garg,et al.  Revised NIOSH equation for the design and evaluation of manual lifting tasks. , 1993, Ergonomics.

[5]  C. E. Clauser,et al.  Anthropometric Relationships of Body and Body Segment Moments of Inertia , 1980 .

[6]  J. Kelsey,et al.  An epidemiologic study of lifting and twisting on the job and risk for acute prolapsed lumbar intervertebral disc , 1984, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[7]  W S Marras,et al.  A Three-Dimensional Motion Model of Loads on the Lumbar Spine: I. Model Structure , 1991, Human factors.

[8]  Y K Liu,et al.  A three-dimensional nonlinear finite element model of lumbar intervertebral joint in torsion. , 1987, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[9]  S. McGill,et al.  Measured and modelled static and dynamic axial trunk torsion during twisting in males and females. , 1990, Journal of biomedical engineering.

[10]  I. Kingma,et al.  Validation of a full body 3-D dynamic linked segment model , 1996 .

[11]  O. Svensson,et al.  The axis of rotation of the ankle joint. , 1989, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[12]  H M Toussaint,et al.  The evaluation of a practical biomechanical model estimating lumbar moments in occupational activities. , 1994, Ergonomics.

[13]  A Plamondon,et al.  Moments at the L(5)/S(1) joint during asymmetrical lifting: effects of different load trajectories and initial load positions. , 1995, Clinical biomechanics.

[14]  R. Norman,et al.  1986 Volvo Award in Biomechanics: Partitioning of the L4 - L5 Dynamic Moment into Disc, Ligamentous, and Muscular Components During Lifting , 1986, Spine.

[15]  M. Adams,et al.  Bending and compressive stresses acting on the lumbar spine during lifting activities. , 1994, Journal of biomechanics.

[16]  W. Marras,et al.  An EMG-assisted model of trunk loading during free-dynamic lifting. , 1995, Journal of biomechanics.

[17]  T P Andriacchi,et al.  Influence of dynamic factors on the lumbar spine moment in lifting. , 1988, Ergonomics.

[18]  M. de Looze,et al.  Validation of a dynamic linked segment model to calculate joint moments in lifting. , 1992, Clinical biomechanics.

[19]  F. Veldpaus,et al.  A least-squares algorithm for the equiform transformation from spatial marker co-ordinates. , 1988, Journal of biomechanics.

[20]  P S Walker,et al.  Geometry and motion of the knee for implant and orthotic design. , 1985, Journal of biomechanics.

[21]  D R Pedersen,et al.  A comparison of the accuracy of several hip center location prediction methods. , 1990, Journal of biomechanics.

[22]  W. T. Dempster,et al.  Properties of body segments based on size and weight , 1967 .

[23]  W S Marras,et al.  Biomechanical risk factors for occupationally related low back disorders. , 1995, Ergonomics.

[24]  Huub M. Toussaint,et al.  The evaluation of a practical model estimating lumbar moments in occupational activities , 1994 .

[25]  D. Winter Biomechanics of Human Movement , 1980 .