Appreciating, Measuring and Incentivising Discipline Diversity: Meaningful Indicators of Collaboration in Research

Inter-disciplinary collaborative research is generally believed to lead to innovative outcomes in areas that may be missed in research studies based in a single discipline. However, currently available research performance indicators, based on scholarly peer-reviewed publications and citations from a single discipline, do little to recognise the merits of collaborative and inter-disciplinary research. This paper presents an empirical study of members of a research unit and their publication and grant profiles. From analysis of this data a set of profile categories emerged together with the relevant indicators which provide a framework from which a deeper understanding of how different research behaviours contribute to the differences in researchers’ individual profiles. These profiles could be used to provide a richer environment for the evaluation of research performance, both in terms of outputs and potential funding opportunities, and indicators of ‘good research’ in inter-disciplinary projects.

[1]  Jörn Altmann,et al.  On the Correlation between Research Performance and Social Network Analysis Measures Applied to Research Collaboration Networks , 2011, 2011 44th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[2]  Chien Hsiang Liao,et al.  How to improve research quality? Examining the impacts of collaboration intensity and member diversity in collaboration networks , 2011, Scientometrics.

[3]  Juhani Iivari,et al.  Expert evaluation vs bibliometric evaluation: experiences from Finland , 2008, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[4]  Kevin W. Boyack,et al.  Approaches to understanding and measuring interdisciplinary scientific research (IDR): A review of the literature , 2011, J. Informetrics.

[5]  C. Donovan,et al.  State of the art in assessing research impact: introduction to a special issue , 2011 .

[6]  John W. Lamp,et al.  RQF publication quality measures: methodological issues , 2007 .

[7]  Janine Rüegg,et al.  Improving the culture of interdisciplinary collaboration in ecology by expanding measures of success , 2014 .

[8]  Diether Gebert,et al.  Managing diversity and enhancing team outcomes: the promise of transformational leadership. , 2009, The Journal of applied psychology.

[9]  Kate Crawford,et al.  A gaming system experience for work in heterogeneous, self-directed teams , 2009 .

[10]  J. E. Hirsch,et al.  An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output , 2005, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA.

[11]  Duane P. Truex,et al.  Evaluating Scholarly Influence Through Social Network Analysis: the Next Step in Evaluating Scholarly Influence , 2010, AMCIS.

[12]  Richard Vidgen,et al.  The scholarly influence of Heinz Klein: ideational and social measures of his impact on IS research and IS scholars , 2011, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[13]  Ismael Rafols,et al.  Diversity and network coherence as indicators of interdisciplinarity: case studies in bionanoscience , 2009, Scientometrics.

[14]  Eldon Y. Li,et al.  Co-authorship networks and research impact: A social capital perspective , 2013 .

[15]  Terttu Luukkonen,et al.  Conservatism and risk-taking in peer review: Emerging ERC practices , 2012 .

[16]  Guillermo P Podesta,et al.  Interdisciplinary production of knowledge with participation of stakeholders: A case study of a collaborative project on climate variability, human decisions and agricultural ecosystems in the Argentine Pampas , 2013 .