A computational fluid dynamics (CFD) model of flow in a mixing tank with a single axial-flow impeller was developed with the FluentTM software. The model consists of an unstructured hexagonal mesh (158,000 total cells), dense in the region from the surface of the impeller. The flow was modeled as laminar and a multiple reference frame approach was used to solve the discretized equations of motion in one-quarter of a baffled tank. A solution of 0.1% Carbopol in water, a shear-thinning fluid, was found to be clear enough to measure impeller discharge angles using laser Doppler velocimetry. This is the first time that impeller discharge angles have been reported in the literature for a shear-thinning fluid with a hydrofoil impeller. Rheological measurements indicated that the Carbopol solution can be characterized by the power law (K=9,n=0.2) under the range of shear conditions (0.1– expected near the impeller in the mixing tank. The CFD model accurately predicted the dependence of power number and discharge angle on Reynolds number (as predicted by Metzner and Otto), for an A200 (pitched blade turbine or PBT) and an A315 (Hydrofoil) impeller operating in the transitional flow regime (Reynolds numbers: 25–400) with glycerin and 0.1% Carbopol solutions. Subsequently, the results of a systematic CFD study with power law fluids indicated that the power number and discharge angle of an axial-flow impeller in the transitional flow regime depends not only on the Reynolds number (as determined by Metzner and Otto's method) but also on the flow behavior index n. Consequently, an alternative to Metzner and Otto's method was pursued. The results of converged CFD simulations indicate that the near-impeller “average shear rate” increases not only with increasing RPM (as proposed by Metzner and Otto), but also with decreasing flow behavior index (n) and discharge angle in the transitional flow regime. Considering this result, an improved method of estimating the power number and discharge angle for power law fluids in the transitional flow regime is proposed.
[1]
G. K. Patterson,et al.
Laser-Doppler measurements of turbulent-flow parameters in a stirred mixer
,
1989
.
[2]
Alberto Brucato,et al.
Numerical prediction of flow fields in baffled stirred vessels: A comparison of alternative modelling approaches
,
1998
.
[3]
F. Rieger,et al.
Power consumption scale-up in agitating non-newtonian fluids
,
1974
.
[4]
A. B. Metzner.
Agitation of non‐Newtonian fluids
,
1957
.
[5]
S. Patankar.
Numerical Heat Transfer and Fluid Flow
,
2018,
Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering.
[6]
Philippe A. Tanguy,et al.
A new investigation of the metzner‐otto concept for anchor mixing impellers
,
1996
.
[7]
C. Geankoplis.
Transport processes and unit operations
,
1978
.
[8]
Philippe A. Tanguy,et al.
A New Perspective for the Mixing of Yield Stress Fluids with Anchor Impellers
,
1996
.
[9]
Mixing of a lignin-based slurry fuel
,
2000
.