Real-time predictive capabilities of analytical and machine learning rate of penetration (ROP) models

Abstract Real-time drilling optimization consists of selecting operational parameters that maximize a desirable measure of drilling performance. Drilling optimization efforts often aspire to improve drilling speed, commonly referred to as rate of penetration (ROP). Three operational drilling parameters may be constantly adjusted at surface to influence ROP: weight on bit (WOB), drillstring rotational speed (RPM), and drilling fluid (mud) flow rate. In the traditional, analytical approach to ROP modeling, inflexible equations relate WOB, RPM, flow rate and/or other measurable drilling parameters to ROP and empirical model coefficients are computed for each rock formation to best fit field data. Over the last decade, enhanced data acquisition technology and widespread cheap computational power have driven a surge in applications of machine learning (ML) techniques to ROP prediction. Machine learning algorithms leverage statistics to uncover relations between any prescribed inputs (features/predictors) and the quantity of interest (response). The biggest advantage of ML algorithms over analytical models is their flexibility in model form. With no set equation, ML models permit segmentation of the drilling operational parameter space. However, the increased model complexity diminishes interpretability of how an adjustment to the inputs will affect the output. There is no single ROP model applicable in every situation. This study investigates real-time predictive capabilities of analytical and ML ROP models in a continuous learning setting. Data are constantly recorded as a well is drilled, and it is postulated that ROP models can learn and adapt in real-time to become more accurate. Novel learning metrics demonstrate that machine learning models reduce test error much more effectively than analytical models with incremental training data availability. Both analytical and ML model performance improves with shortened retraining intervals, defined either by length or number of data points. Cross-validation is investigated as a methodology to select the best performing ROP model in real-time.

[1]  John R. Eckel Effect of Pressure on Rock Drillability , 1958 .

[2]  Robello Samuel,et al.  An Analytical Model Coupled With Data Analytics to Estimate PDC Bit Wear , 2014 .

[3]  Karim Salahshoor,et al.  Comparison of the Penetration Rate Models Using Field Data for One of the Gas Fields in Persian Gulf Area , 2010 .

[4]  Abdel Sattar Abdel Hamid Dahab,et al.  An ROP Predictive Model in Nile Delta Area Using Artificial Neural Networks , 2017 .

[5]  Fred E. Dupriest,et al.  Maximizing Drill Rates with Real-Time Surveillance of Mechanical Specific Energy , 2005 .

[6]  Andrew Wu,et al.  New Approach in Real-Time Bit Wear Prediction , 2010 .

[7]  Daniela M. Witten,et al.  An Introduction to Statistical Learning: with Applications in R , 2013 .

[8]  W. C. Maurer,et al.  The "Perfect - Cleaning" Theory of Rotary Drilling , 1962 .

[9]  Yashodhan Keshav Gidh,et al.  Artificial Neural Network Drilling Parameter Optimization System Improves ROP by Predicting/Managing Bit Wear , 2012 .

[10]  B. Mantha,et al.  ROP Optimization Using Artificial Intelligence Techniques with Statistical Regression Coupling , 2016 .

[11]  Geoffrey E. Hinton,et al.  Deep Learning , 2015, Nature.

[12]  F. S. Jr. Young Dynamic Filtration During Microbit Drilling , 1967 .

[13]  A. S. Murray,et al.  Effect of Mud Column Pressure on Drilling Rates , 1955 .

[14]  Abouzar Bahari,et al.  Trust-Region Approach To Find Constants of Bourgoyne and Young Penetration Rate Model in Khangiran Iranian Gas Field , 2007 .

[15]  Travis E. Oliphant,et al.  Python for Scientific Computing , 2007, Computing in Science & Engineering.

[16]  J. Eckel Microbit Studies of the Effect of Fluid Properties and Hydraulics on Drilling Rate , 1967 .

[17]  Cesar Mattos de Salles Soares Development and applications of a new system to analyze field data and compare rate of penetration (ROP) models , 2015 .

[18]  T. M. Warren,et al.  Drag Bit Performance Modeling , 1986 .

[19]  Kevin P. Murphy,et al.  Machine learning - a probabilistic perspective , 2012, Adaptive computation and machine learning series.

[20]  Geir Hareland,et al.  Drag - Bit Model Including Wear , 1994 .

[21]  Kenneth E. Gray,et al.  Evaluation of PDC bit ROP models and the effect of rock strength on model coefficients , 2016 .

[22]  Bahari Mohamad Hasan,et al.  INTELLIGENT DRILLING RATE PREDICTOR , 2011 .

[23]  Gaël Varoquaux,et al.  Scikit-learn: Machine Learning in Python , 2011, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[24]  Masood Mostofi,et al.  A New Method for Determining Bourgoyne and Young Penetration Rate Model Constants , 2011 .

[25]  Geir Hareland,et al.  Real-Time Drill Bit Wear Prediction by Combining Rock Energy and Drilling Strength Concepts , 2008 .

[26]  Artem Kuznetcov ROP optimization and modelling in directional drilling process , 2017 .

[27]  J. L. Peterson Diamond Drilling Model Verified in Field and Laboratory Tests , 1976 .

[28]  R. Cunningham,et al.  Laboratory Study of Effect of Overburden, Formation and Mud Column Pressures on Drilling Rate of Permeable Formations , 1959 .

[29]  D. S. Rowley,et al.  Analysis of the Cutting Action of a Single Diamond , 1968 .

[30]  Salaheldin Elkatatny,et al.  Optimization of Rate of Penetration using Artificial Intelligent Techniques , 2017 .

[31]  Nadine Osayande,et al.  Predicting and Optimizing ROP in Competent Shale by Utilizing MPD Technology , 2015 .

[32]  Mohamad Hasan Bahari,et al.  Determining Bourgoyne and Young Model Coefficient Using Genetic Algorithm to Predict Drilling Rate , 2008 .

[33]  J. Eckel Effect of Mud Properties on Drilling Rate , 1954 .

[34]  H.C.H. Darley,et al.  Designing Fast Drilling Fluids , 1965 .

[35]  Nasser M. Nasrabadi,et al.  Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning , 2006, Technometrics.

[36]  Andreas Nascimento,et al.  A Study of the Applicability of Bourgoyne & Young ROP Model and Fitting Reliability through Regression , 2015 .

[37]  Keith K. Millheim,et al.  Applied Drilling Engineering , 1986 .

[38]  Harry R. Millwater,et al.  Analysis of rate of penetration (ROP) prediction in drilling using physics-based and data-driven models , 2017 .

[39]  Kurt Hornik,et al.  Multilayer feedforward networks are universal approximators , 1989, Neural Networks.

[40]  Scott Wallace,et al.  Using Trees, Bagging, and Random Forests to Predict Rate of Penetration During Drilling , 2015 .

[41]  Emmanuel M Detournay,et al.  A phenomenological model for the drilling action of drag bits , 1992 .

[42]  L. A. Sinor,et al.  The Effect of PDC Cutter Density, Back Rake, Size, and Speed on Performance , 1998 .

[43]  Masoud Amirpour,et al.  Drilling rate of penetration prediction through committee support vector regression based on imperialist competitive algorithm , 2017, Carbonates and Evaporites.

[44]  John R. Eckel,et al.  An Analysis of Hydraulic Factors Affecting the Rate of Penetration of Drag-type Rotary Bits , 1949 .

[45]  Rudolf Konrad Fruhwirth,et al.  ROP Modeling using NeuralNetwork and Drill String Vibration Data , 2012 .

[46]  P. J. Huber Robust Estimation of a Location Parameter , 1964 .

[47]  S. J. Green,et al.  Effects of Bit Hydraulics on Full-Scale Laboratory Drilled Shale , 1981 .

[48]  John R. Eckel Microbit Studies of the Effect of Fluid Properties And Hydraulics on Drilling Rate, II , 1968 .

[49]  Robert Howe,et al.  1545-G - Laboratory Drilling Performance of the Full-Scale Rock Bit , 1961 .

[50]  Geoffrey E. Hinton,et al.  Learning representations by back-propagating errors , 1986, Nature.

[51]  R. Jahanbakhshi,et al.  Real-time Prediction of Rate of Penetration During Drilling Operation In Oil And Gas Wells , 2012 .

[52]  Roger W. Fincher,et al.  Development and Successful Application of Unique Steerable PDC Bits , 1998 .

[53]  N. H. Van Lingen Bottom Scavenging-A Major Factor Governing Penetration Rates at Depth , 1962 .

[54]  Behzad Tokhmechi,et al.  Determination of constant coefficients of Bourgoyne and Young drilling rate model using a novel evolutionary algorithm , 2017 .

[55]  Robert Tibshirani,et al.  The Elements of Statistical Learning: Data Mining, Inference, and Prediction, 2nd Edition , 2001, Springer Series in Statistics.

[56]  Mike Payne,et al.  Advanced BHA-ROP Modeling Including Neural Network Analysis of Drilling Performance Data , 2016 .

[57]  Zhang Lu,et al.  Innovative Bit Design Coupled with New Cutter Technology Improves PDC Bit Performance in Challenging Changbei Gas Field Application , 2014 .

[58]  F. S. Young,et al.  A Multiple Regression Approach to Optimal Drilling and Abnormal Pressure Detection , 1974 .

[59]  Shane Legg,et al.  Human-level control through deep reinforcement learning , 2015, Nature.

[60]  Paulo José de Freitas Filho,et al.  Estimation of Bourgoyne and Young Model coefficients using Markov Chain Monte Carlo simulation , 2015, 2015 Winter Simulation Conference (WSC).

[61]  Geir Hareland,et al.  Improved Drilling Efficiency Technique Using Integrated PDM and PDC Bit Parameters , 2010 .

[62]  Mohamad Hasan Bahari,et al.  Drilling rate prediction using an innovative soft computing approach , 2010 .

[63]  A. J. Garnier,et al.  Phenomena Affecting Drilling Rates at Depth , 1959 .

[64]  Shahab D. Mohaghegh,et al.  A New Approach for the Prediction of Rate of Penetration (ROP) Values , 1997 .

[65]  D. A. Glowka,et al.  Use of single-cutter data in the analysis of PDC bit designs , 1986 .

[66]  Jialin Zhang,et al.  An Efficient Approach for Real-Time Prediction of Rate of Penetration in Offshore Drilling , 2016 .