Clinical interest in determinations of cellular radiation sensitivity.

Determinations of cell sensitivity in terms of survival fraction after doses employed in clinical radiation therapy, say 1-3 Gy, are of increasing interest to clinicians as they provide direct experimental data which can be employed without reference to models of cell inactivation. SF2 values are expected ultimately to prove valuable as response predictors. Even so, SF2 values would surely be combined with other predictors also under development to give the best feasible estimate of response of tumor and normal tissue. There are, however, several concerns with the SF2 data currently available. These include: SF2 depends upon the cell system employed (established cell lines vs primary cultures) and the method of assaying survival fraction (colony formation vs population growth); dose-response curves for inactivation of tumors characterized by the reported distribution of SF2 values are, in many instances, not close to those judged to obtain in clinical practice; the broad distribution of SF2 values indicates a rather flatter dose-response curve for tumor control or normal tissue than seems true from clinical experience. There appears to be a potential for clinical gain by determination of sensitivity of normal tissues in order to identify patients who are of increased sensitivity (for example heterozygotes for AT, 5-oxoprolinuria, etc.). Although the absolute SF2 values obtained by current technologies of culturing human cells often appear to be poorly related to values expected from observed radiation response in patients, intensive research on cell viability assays will almost certainly yield more realistic results.

[1]  A. Zietman,et al.  Radiation response of xenografts of a human squamous cell carcinoma and a glioblastoma multiforme: a progress report. , 1990, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[2]  M. Swift,et al.  Breast and other cancers in families with ataxia-telangiectasia. , 1987, The New England journal of medicine.

[3]  A. Harwood Conventional fractionated radiotherapy for 51 patients with lentigo maligna and lentigo maligna melanoma. , 1983, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[4]  A. Kagan,et al.  The importance of genetics for the optimization of radiation therapy. A hypothesis. , 1988, American journal of clinical oncology.

[5]  J. Moore,et al.  Dose-incidence curves for tumour control and normal tissue injury, in relation to the response of clonogenic cells. , 1983, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[6]  A. Taylor,et al.  Ataxia telangiectasia: a human mutation with abnormal radiation sensitivity , 1975, Nature.

[7]  P. Deschavanne,et al.  Re-evaluation of in vitro radiosensitivity of human fibroblasts of different genetic origins. , 1986, International journal of radiation biology and related studies in physics, chemistry, and medicine.

[8]  V. Devita,et al.  Cancer : Principles and Practice of Oncology , 1982 .

[9]  M. Yatvin,et al.  Radiosensitivity of peripheral blood lymphocytes in autoimmune disease. , 1985, International journal of radiation biology and related studies in physics, chemistry, and medicine.

[10]  E. Rofstad,et al.  Radiation sensitivity in vitro of cells isolated from human tumor surgical specimens. , 1987, Cancer research.

[11]  P. Deschavanne,et al.  Survival curves of glutathione synthetase deficient human fibroblasts: correlation between radiosensitivity in hypoxia and glutathione synthetase activity. , 1985, International journal of radiation biology and related studies in physics, chemistry, and medicine.

[12]  G. Steel,et al.  The radioresponsiveness of human tumours and the initial slope of the cell survival curve. , 1984, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[13]  P. Rubin,et al.  High dose radiation therapy in the treatment of malignant gliomas: final report. , 1979, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[14]  P. Gutin,et al.  Recurrent malignant gliomas: survival following interstitial brachytherapy with high-activity iodine-125 sources. , 1987, Journal of neurosurgery.

[15]  J. Yuhas,et al.  On mouse strain differences in radiation resistance: hematopoietic death and the endogenous colony-forming unit. , 1969, Radiation research.

[16]  M. Walker,et al.  An analysis of dose-effect relationship in the radiotherapy of malignant gliomas. , 1979, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[17]  A Brahme,et al.  Dosimetric precision requirements in radiation therapy. , 1984, Acta radiologica. Oncology.

[18]  L. Davis,et al.  Malignant glioma--a nemesis which requires clinical and basic investigation in radiation oncology. , 1989, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[19]  B. Fertil,et al.  Inherent cellular radiosensitivity as a basic concept for human tumor radiotherapy. , 1981, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[20]  W. W. Nichols,et al.  Survival of human diploid skin fibroblasts from normal individuals after X-irradiation. , 1988, International journal of radiation biology.

[21]  G. Laramore,et al.  Randomized neutron dose searching study for malignant gliomas of the brain: results of an RTOG study. Radiation Therapy Oncology Group. , 1988, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.