The Determinants of Patent Applications Outcomes - Does Experience Matter?

The aim of this paper is to study the determinants of the outcomes of patent applications (withdrawal, refusal or grant). The application process at the European Patent Office is modelled in three stages, using a Trivariate Probit model with double selectivity correction in order to test whether the applicants ?patenting history has an effect on the outcome of the current application. I investigate the behavior of the applicant after the patent office has established the "state of the art", a precondition to an invention being patentable. The main results are (i) firms with large patents portfolios act following a "trial and error" strategy, by applying for large numbers of patents and thereafter waiting for the patent office?s final decision when the expected probability of grant is high, (ii) the technological importance of a patent is a crucial determinant of a successful application grant, (iii) a withdrawal is to be regarded as an expected refusal, since applicants tend to withdraw their applications when there is evidence that the inventions cannot be considered to be novel or to involve an inventive step.

[1]  Z. Griliches,et al.  Citations, Family Size, Opposition and the Value of Patent Rights Have Profited from Comments and Suggestions , 2002 .

[2]  Mark A. Schankerman,et al.  Patent Quality and Research Productivity: Measuring Innovation with Multiple Indicators , 2004 .

[3]  J. Lerner The Importance of Patent Scope: An Empirical Analysis , 1994 .

[4]  D. Harhoff,et al.  Citation Frequency and the Value of Patented Innovation , 1997 .

[5]  Dietmar Harhoff,et al.  Modelling the Duration of Patent Examination at the European Patent Office , 2005 .

[6]  M. Trajtenberg A Penny for Your Quotes : Patent Citations and the Value of Innovations , 1990 .

[7]  D. Harhoff,et al.  Determinants of Opposition against EPO Patent Grants – The Case of Biotechnology and Pharmaceuticals ∗ , 2002 .

[8]  D. Harhoff,et al.  Citation Frequency and the Value of Patented Inventions , 1999, Review of Economics and Statistics.

[9]  Christian Gourieroux,et al.  Simulation-based econometric methods , 1996 .

[10]  Katharine Rockett,et al.  Are More Important Patents Approved More Slowly and Should They Be? , 2007 .

[11]  Francisco Pérez-Gónzalez,et al.  Inside the Family Firm: The Role of Families in Succession Decisions and Performance , 2006 .

[12]  Bruno van Pottelsberghe de la Potterie,et al.  Applications, grants and the value of patent , 2000 .

[13]  W. V. D. Ven,et al.  The demand for deductibles in private health insurance: A probit model with sample selection , 1981 .

[14]  Karin Hoisl,et al.  European Patent Citations – How to Count and How to Interpret them, unpublished manuscript, University of Munich , 2009 .

[15]  G. Duysters,et al.  PASSING THE EUROPEAN PATENT OFFICE: EVIDENCE FROM THE DATA-PROCESSING INDUSTRY , 1998 .

[16]  Bronwyn H Hall,et al.  Market value and patent citations , 2005 .