Longitudinal dento-skeletal changes in UCLP patients following maxillary distraction osteogenesis using RED system.

Longitudinal dento-skeletal changes in unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP) patients following maxillary distraction osteogenesis using the rigid external distraction device (RED) were analyzed. Twelve Japanese non-syndromic UCLP patients who underwent maxillary distraction at the mean age of 16.4 years were used as subjects. Serial sets of lateral cephalograms, taken at 4 stages: 1) before osteotomy, 2) immediately after distraction, 3) 6 months and 4) 12 months post-osteotomy, were analyzed. Statistical analyses, including a paired t test, Pearson correlation analysis and stepwise linear regression analysis, were performed to distill characteristic dento-skeletal changes. In accordance with maxillary advancement, significant amounts of up-forward movement of the nasal bone, mandibular rotation and maxillary dental changes were observed. Maxillary dental changes were significantly related to the amount of mandibular rotation and force system of maxillary traction. Significant dento-skeletal relapse was found to occur during the 0-to-6-month follow-up period, but not in the 6-to-12-month follow-up period. Maxillary relapse was significantly related to the amount of maxillary advancement and severity of pre-surgical maxillary hypoplasia, while mandibular relapse was significantly related to maxillary dento-skeletal relapse. Successful clinical application of this procedure therefore requires consideration of both the surrounding dento-skeletal changes and the traction force system.

[1]  A. Heggie,et al.  A Comparison of the Stability of Single-Piece and Segmental Le Fort I Maxillary Advancements , 2003, The Journal of craniofacial surgery.

[2]  W. Shaw,et al.  Ethical and Scientific Decision Making in Distraction Osteogenesis , 2002 .

[3]  M. Krimmel,et al.  External Distraction of the Maxilla in Patients With Craniofacial Dysplasia , 2001, The Journal of craniofacial surgery.

[4]  A. Figueroa,et al.  Soft tissue profile changes after maxillary advancement with distraction osteogenesis by use of a rigid external distraction device: a 1-year follow-up. , 2000, Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons.

[5]  G. Swennen,et al.  Maxillary distraction osteogenesis: a two-dimensional mathematical model. , 2000, The Journal of craniofacial surgery.

[6]  G. Swennen,et al.  Maxillary distraction osteogenesis: a method with skeletal anchorage. , 2000, The Journal of craniofacial surgery.

[7]  G. Swennen,et al.  Maxillary distraction in cleft lip palate patients: a review of six cases. , 1999, The Journal of craniofacial surgery.

[8]  A. Figueroa,et al.  Management of severe cleft maxillary deficiency with distraction osteogenesis: procedure and results. , 1999, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[9]  A. Figueroa,et al.  Rigid External Distraction: Its Application in Cleft Maxillary Deformities , 1998, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[10]  A. Figueroa,et al.  Management of severe maxillary deficiency in childhood and adolescence through distraction osteogenesis with an external, adjustable, rigid distraction device. , 1997, The Journal of craniofacial surgery.

[11]  M. Block,et al.  Anterior maxillary advancement using tooth-supported distraction osteogenesis. , 1995, Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons.

[12]  S. McCabe,et al.  Identification of nasal morphologic features that indicate susceptibility to nasal tip deflection with the LeFort I osteotomy. , 1995, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[13]  A Codivilla,et al.  On the means of lengthening, in the lower limbs, the muscles and tissues which are shortened through deformity. 1904. , 1905, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[14]  C. Ganss,et al.  Long-term results after maxillary advancement in patients with clefts. , 1993, The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal : official publication of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association.

[15]  J. McCarthy,et al.  Bone Lengthening of the Human Mandible by Gradual Distraction , 1991 .

[16]  T. Turvey,et al.  Stability after surgical-orthodontic correction of skeletal Class III malocclusion. 2. Maxillary advancement. , 1991, The International journal of adult orthodontics and orthognathic surgery.

[17]  G A Ilizarov,et al.  The tension-stress effect on the genesis and growth of tissues. Part I. The influence of stability of fixation and soft-tissue preservation. , 1989, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[18]  W M Smalley,et al.  Osseointegrated titanium implants for maxillofacial protraction in monkeys. , 1988, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[19]  S. Coben Growth and class II treatment. , 1966, American journal of orthodontics.