Probabilistic analysis of shield-driven tunnel in multiple strata considering stratigraphic uncertainty

Abstract Subsurface formations with multiple soil/rock strata are a common geological condition for shield-driven tunnel (i.e., tunnel constructed using shield-driven machines) construction. The excavation face, under such conditions, often encounters a frequently changing stratigraphic configuration that consists of various lithological units. Furthermore, due to a lack of direct and continuous observations of the subsurface region, it is difficult to predict the stratigraphic profile along the entire excavation path with a high degree of certainty. Such a widely changing and uncertain excavation environment may lead to wide variation in the state of stress and deformation of the tunnel structure along the longitudinal direction. This poses a challenge for design engineers in obtaining accurate performance evaluations or reasonable design outcomes for tunnel construction in subsurface ground with multiple strata. This paper aims to address this challenge by presenting a stochastic geological modeling framework for uncertainty quantification of stratigraphic profiles using sparsely located observation information from geotechnical site investigations. In the proposed modeling framework, the underground soil stratigraphic profile is regarded as a Markov random field with specific energy functions, which is able to describe the inherent anisotropic and non-stationary spatial correlation of lithological units in the subsurface stratigraphic structure. By incorporating the developed stochastic geological modeling framework with a finite element simulation of the tunnel excavation, a probabilistic analysis approach is established to evaluate the effects of stratigraphic uncertainty on the structural performance of a shield-driven tunnel.

[1]  L. Y. Hu,et al.  Multiple‐point geostatistics for modeling subsurface heterogeneity: A comprehensive review , 2008 .

[2]  K Schikora,et al.  TWO-DIMENSIONAL CALCULATION MODEL IN TUNNELING - VERIFICATION BY MEASUREMENT RESULTS AND BY SPATIAL CALCULATION. PROCEEDINGS OF THE SIXTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON NUMERICAL METHODS IN GEOMECHANICS, 11-15 APRIL 1988, INNSBRUCK, AUSTRIA. VOLUMES 1 - 3 , 1988 .

[3]  Abdul-Hamid Soubra,et al.  Probabilistic analysis at the serviceability limit state of two neighboring strip footings resting on a spatially random soil , 2014 .

[4]  Herbert H. Einstein,et al.  Design and construction of a road tunnel in Korea including application of the Decision Aids for Tunneling - A case study , 2008 .

[5]  A. Guenot,et al.  Analysis of convergence behind the face of a tunnel : Tunnelling 82, proceedings of the 3rd international symposium, Brighton, 7–11 June 1982, P197–204. Publ London: IMM, 1982 , 1983 .

[6]  Matsuda Hiroshi,et al.  Analysis of beams on non-homogeneous elastic foundation , 1987 .

[7]  J. Chilès,et al.  Geological modelling from field data and geological knowledge. Part I. Modelling method coupling 3D potential-field interpolation and geological rules , 2008 .

[8]  Jorge G. Zornberg,et al.  Numerical Analysis of a Tunnel in Residual Soils , 2002 .

[9]  Robert Y. Liang,et al.  Quantifying stratigraphic uncertainties by stochastic simulation techniques based on Markov random field , 2016 .

[10]  J. Besag Spatial Interaction and the Statistical Analysis of Lattice Systems , 1974 .

[11]  J. Chilès,et al.  Modelling the geometry of geological units and its uncertainty in 3D from structural data: The potential-field method , 2007 .

[12]  Robert Y. Liang,et al.  Reliability‐based design for slopes reinforced with a row of drilled shafts , 2014 .

[13]  Michael A. Hicks,et al.  On the estimation of scale of fluctuation in geostatistics , 2014 .

[14]  Jie Zhang,et al.  Optimization of site exploration program for improved prediction of tunneling-induced ground settlement in clays , 2014 .

[15]  Michel Dekking,et al.  A Markov Chain Model for Subsurface Characterization: Theory and Applications , 2001 .

[16]  Assaf Klar,et al.  Elastoplastic Solution for Soil-Pipe-Tunnel Interaction , 2007 .

[17]  Li Min Zhang,et al.  Characterizing geotechnical anisotropic spatial variations using random field theory , 2013 .

[18]  F. Horowitz,et al.  Towards incorporating uncertainty of structural data in 3D geological inversion , 2010 .

[19]  K. Phoon,et al.  Copula-based approaches for evaluating slope reliability under incomplete probability information , 2015 .

[20]  Robert B. Gilbert,et al.  Modeling spatial variability in offshore geotechnical properties for reliability-based foundation design , 2014 .

[21]  J. Wellmann,et al.  Uncertainties have a meaning: Information entropy as a quality measure for 3-D geological models , 2012 .

[22]  Jef Caers,et al.  Multiple-point Geostatistics: A Quantitative Vehicle for Integrating Geologic Analogs into Multiple Reservoir Models , 2004 .

[23]  Maosong Huang,et al.  Theoretical prediction of ground movements induced by tunnelling in multi-layered soils , 2011 .

[24]  Jean-Laurent Mallet,et al.  Discrete smooth interpolation , 1989, TOGS.

[25]  J. Chilès,et al.  The Channel Tunnel: Geostatistical prediction of the geological conditions and its validation by the reality , 1993 .

[26]  Håkon Tjelmeland,et al.  Construction of Binary Multi-grid Markov Random Field Prior Models from Training Images , 2013, Mathematical Geosciences.

[27]  M. A. Nunes,et al.  A study on the effects of overlying soil strata on the stresses developing in a tunnel lining , 2009 .

[28]  Yu Wang,et al.  Bayesian model comparison and selection of spatial correlation functions for soil parameters , 2014 .

[29]  Qiuming Gong,et al.  Tunnelling through a frequently changing and mixed ground : a case history in Singapore , 2007 .

[30]  Hongwei Huang,et al.  Influence of multi-layered soil formation on shield tunnel lining behavior , 2015 .

[31]  A. Gomes Correia,et al.  Bayesian methodology for updating geomechanical parameters and uncertainty quantification , 2009 .

[32]  Alfred Stein,et al.  Quantification of the Effects of Land-Cover-Class Spectral Separability on the Accuracy of Markov-Random-Field-Based Superresolution Mapping , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[33]  Moshe Eisenberger,et al.  Beams on nonlinear winkler foundation with gaps , 1988 .

[34]  Gordon A. Fenton,et al.  Estimation for Stochastic Soil Models , 1999 .

[35]  Hongwei Huang,et al.  Simplified procedure for finite element analysis of the longitudinal performance of shield tunnels considering spatial soil variability in longitudinal direction , 2015 .

[36]  Yu Wang,et al.  Bayesian approach for probabilistic characterization of sand friction angles , 2010 .

[37]  G Galli,et al.  Three-dimensional modelling of tunnel excavation and lining , 2004 .

[38]  Donald Geman,et al.  Stochastic Relaxation, Gibbs Distributions, and the Bayesian Restoration of Images , 1984, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[39]  Stan Z. Li,et al.  Markov Random Field Modeling in Image Analysis , 2001, Computer Science Workbench.

[40]  Gordon A. Fenton,et al.  Probabilistic slope stability analysis by finite elements , 2004 .

[41]  Lars Rosén,et al.  On Modelling Discrete Geological Structures as Markov Random Fields , 2002 .

[42]  Jianhang Liu,et al.  Assessment service state of tunnel structure , 2012 .