Intermediate Performance Impacts of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Systems: An Empirical Investigation*

A large-scale random sample is used to empirically examine the relationships between implementation of Advanced Manufacturing Technology (AMT) and three organization-level measures that have historically been attributed to AMT, but not fully tested along the AMT spectrum: market-oriented flexibility of the production process, organizational integration of production processes, and administrative intensity of the organization. Results indicate that as an organization moves along the technology scale from stand-alone AMT (e.g., CNC machines) through functionally oriented AMT (FMS and CAM) toward CIM, not only do its production processes become more integrated with each other, but those processes become more integrated with other functional systems of the organization, and the quality and timeliness of production information increase. Furthermore, this relationship becomes stronger as companies increase their level of implementation for the latter two technologies. Conversely, market-oriented flexibility decreases and administrative intensity is not observed to change as companies move along the technology spectrum. Future research should examine how organizational redesign and implementation strategies that accompany AMT implementation can concomitantly enhance organizational integration of the production process and market-oriented flexibility.

[1]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  Validating Instruments in MIS Research , 1989, MIS Q..

[2]  Arkalgud Ramaprasad,et al.  Envisioning management of information , 1996 .

[3]  J. W. Hopkins,et al.  Some Empirical Distributions of Bivariate T 2 and Homoscedasticity Criterion M Under Unequal Variance and Leptokurtosis , 1963 .

[4]  Kevin Crowston,et al.  A Coordination Theory Approach to Organizational Process Design , 1997 .

[5]  Sunder Kekre,et al.  Business Value of Information Technology: A Study of Electronic Data Interchange , 1995, MIS Q..

[6]  Donald Tomaskovic-Devey,et al.  Organizational Survey Nonresponse , 1994 .

[7]  R. Daft A Dual-Core Model of Organizational Innovation , 1978 .

[8]  L. Kanuk,et al.  Mail Surveys and Response Rates: A Literature Review , 1975 .

[9]  Ernesto M. Reza,et al.  Organizational Integration and Process Innovation , 1992 .

[10]  T. Perneger What's wrong with Bonferroni adjustments , 1998, BMJ.

[11]  R. Jaikumar Postindustrial manufacturing , 1986 .

[12]  Vijay Sethi,et al.  Construct Measurement in Information Systems Research: An Illustration in Strategic Systems , 1991 .

[13]  E. B. Swanson,et al.  Information systems innovation among organizations , 1994 .

[14]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  The Problem of Statistical Power in MIS Research , 1989, MIS Q..

[15]  Suresh P. Sethi,et al.  Flexibility in manufacturing: A survey , 1990 .

[16]  Oswald Jones,et al.  The Introduction of CIM: A Strategic Analysis , 1994 .

[17]  John E. Ettlie,et al.  Integrating Design and Manufacturing to Deploy Advanced Manufacturing Technology , 1987 .

[18]  Bruce S. Koch,et al.  Justification of High Technology Capital Investment - An Empirical Study , 1992 .

[19]  Varun Grover,et al.  Empirical Evidence on Swanson's Tri-Core Model of Information Systems Innovation , 1997, Inf. Syst. Res..

[20]  Kim B. Clark,et al.  Architectural Innovation: The Reconfiguration of Existing Product Technologies and the Failure of , 1990 .

[21]  Mariann Jelinek,et al.  Computer Integrated Flexible Manufacturing: Organizational, Economic, and Strategic Implications , 1985 .

[22]  Deepinder S. Bajwa,et al.  An Empirical Investigation into Factors Relating to the Adoption of Executive Information Systems: An Analysis of EIS for Collaboration and Decision Support* , 1997 .

[23]  Kenneth K. Boyer,et al.  Unlocking the potential of advanced manufacturing technologies , 1997 .

[24]  Arun Rai,et al.  A Structural Model for CASE Adoption Behavior , 1996, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[25]  M. H. Small,et al.  Advanced manufacturing technology: Implementation policy and performance , 1997 .

[26]  M. Markus,et al.  Information technology and organizational change: causal structure in theory and research , 1988 .

[27]  William J. Doll,et al.  Forging a Partnership to Achieve Competitive Advantage: The CIM Challenge , 1987, MIS Q..

[28]  Varun Grover,et al.  The Initiation, Adoption, and Implementation of Telecommunications Technologies in U.S. Organizations , 1993, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[29]  S. Sethi,et al.  The Impact of Flexible Automation on Business Strategy and Organizational Structure , 1992 .

[30]  Chester L. Olson,et al.  Comparative Robustness of Six Tests in Multivariate Analysis of Variance , 1974 .

[31]  D. Upton Process range in manufacturing: an empirical study of flexibility , 1997 .

[32]  John C. Lind,et al.  Two-sample T–2 procedure and the assumption of homogeneous covariance matrices. , 1979 .

[33]  Nallan C. Suresh,et al.  Justifying multimachine systems: An integrated strategic approach , 1985 .

[34]  Kenneth K. Boyer,et al.  MANUFACTURING PROACTIVENESS AND PERFORMANCE , 1994 .

[35]  D. Gerwin Manufacturing flexibility: a strategic perspective , 1993 .

[36]  R F Potthoff,et al.  Testing for homogeneity. I. The binomial and multinomial distributions. , 1966, Biometrika.

[37]  R. Zmud,et al.  Information technology implementation research: a technological diffusion approach , 1990 .

[38]  Jinjoo Lee,et al.  Manufacturing strategy and production systems: An integrated framework , 1993 .

[39]  Arun Rai,et al.  Technology investment and business performance , 1997, CACM.

[40]  Jeffrey Miller,et al.  Flexibility: The Next Competitive Battle: The Manufacturing Futures Survey , 1989 .

[41]  S. Snell,et al.  THE STRATEGIC USE OF INTEGRATED MANUFACTURING: AN EMPIRICAL EXAMINATION , 1996 .

[42]  S. Vickery,et al.  Dimensions of manufacturing strength in the furniture industry , 1997 .