Constructionist principles in online teacher professional development: Robotics and hands-on activities in the Classroom

Wayfinder Education Group This report explores the first iteration of a teacher professional development Courselet grounded in constructionist theory and activities. A design-based research approach guided this continuing examination of online teacher professional development (oTPD) activities within an educator social networking site. The topic of the oTPD was “Robotics and Hands-on Learning in the Classroom” for teachers interested in integrating constructionist LEGO robotics-based pedagogies. The Courselet engaged teachers in just-in-time, ongoing TPD utilizing Web 2.0 tools. Key findings of the first delivery of the oTPD Courselet point to flexible access, sharing of resources, teacher discussions, and support for constructionist pedagogical activities as the PD value for participants. Findings support the potential for an ongoing online community of practice around classroom robotics. The approach taken in this oTPD Courselet continues to inform a model of oTPD delivery within a social networking enabled environment. Further research is needed to determine the transfer of oTPD to classroom practice. Keywords: constructionist, LEGO robotics, online teacher PD, oTPD, courselet

[1]  Charalambos Vrasidas,et al.  Online professional development for teachers , 2004 .

[2]  Dimitris Alimisis Designing robotics-enhanced constructivist training for science and technology teachers: the TERECoP Project , 2008 .

[3]  H. Borko Professional Development and Teacher Learning: Mapping the Terrain , 2004 .

[4]  Marina Umaschi Bers,et al.  Project InterActions: A Multigenerational Robotic Learning Environment , 2007 .

[5]  Nathaniel Ostashewski,et al.  Online Technology Teacher Professional Development Courselets: Design and Development , 2010 .

[6]  Nathaniel Ostashewski,et al.  Online Teacher Professional Development: Redesign and Delivery of a Technological Pedagogical Courselet within a Social Networking Site , 2010 .

[7]  E. Ackermann Piaget ’ s Constructivism , Papert ’ s Constructionism : What ’ s the difference ? , 2001 .

[8]  Feng Wang,et al.  Importance of Design-Based Research for Technology-Enhanced Learning Environments , 2003 .

[9]  Pamela Whitehouse,et al.  Globaloria Pilot Year One: New Directions for 21st Century Teacher Professional Development , 2009 .

[10]  Jon Dron,et al.  How the Crowd Can Teach , 2011 .

[11]  Terry Anderson,et al.  Higher education evolution: Individual freedom afforded by educational social software , 2006 .

[12]  Gary S. Stager The feeling of wonderful ideas: implications for the future of teaching and learning , 2003 .

[13]  Ron Oliver,et al.  Exploring the development of learning communities in online settings , 2002 .

[14]  C. Dede,et al.  A Research Agenda for Online Teacher Professional Development , 2009 .

[15]  Marina Umaschi Bers,et al.  Teachers as Designers: Integrating Robotics in Early Childhood Education. , 2002 .

[16]  Igor M. Verner,et al.  Robot Projects and Competitions as Education Design Experiments , 2007, Intell. Autom. Soft Comput..

[17]  M. Moro,et al.  Robotics & Constructivism in Education : the TERECoP project , 2007 .

[18]  Mike Carbonaro,et al.  Scaffolding Knowledge Construction through Robotic Technology: A Middle School Case Study , 2007 .

[19]  H. Borko,et al.  Wicked Problems and Other Thoughts on Issues of Technology and Teacher Learning , 2009 .

[20]  Jan Herrington,et al.  Transfer of online professional learning to teachers' classroom practice: An analysis of eight cases , 2006 .

[21]  Dirk S. Hovorka,et al.  Active collaboration learning environments: The class of Web 2.0 , 2009 .

[22]  Laura M. Desimone,et al.  Improving Impact Studies of Teachers’ Professional Development: Toward Better Conceptualizations and Measures , 2009 .