Exploring Some Analytical Characteristics of Finite Mixture Models

Finite mixture models have become increasingly prevalent in criminology over the past two decades. Yet there is no consensus about the appropriate criterion for model selection with finite mixture specifications. In this paper, we use simulation evidence to examine model selection criteria. Our focus is on mixture models for event count data like those often encountered in criminology. We use two indices to measure model selection performance. First, we examine how often each criterion chooses the correct specification. Then, we investigate how closely the finite mixture models selected by these criteria approximate the true mixing distribution used to simulate the event count data. We consider three sets of simulations. In the first set, the underlying model is itself a three component Poisson-based finite mixture model. In the two other sets of simulations, the underlying distribution of the Poisson rate parameter follows a continuous distribution. The analysis shows that both AIC and BIC perform well under certain sets of circumstances likely to be encountered by criminologists.

[1]  H. Akaike A new look at the statistical model identification , 1974 .

[2]  G. Schwarz Estimating the Dimension of a Model , 1978 .

[3]  Alfred Blumstein,et al.  THE IDENTIFICATION OF “CAREER CRIMINALS” FROM “CHRONIC OFFENDERS” IN A COHORT , 1980 .

[4]  N. Morris,et al.  Crime and justice : an annual review of research , 1980 .

[5]  Michael R. Gottfredson,et al.  A general theory of crime. , 1992 .

[6]  J. Heckman,et al.  A Method for Minimizing the Impact of Distributional Assumptions in Econometric Models for Duration Data , 1984 .

[7]  Alfred Blumstein,et al.  Delinquency Careers: Innocents, Desisters, and Persisters , 1985, Crime and Justice.

[8]  A. F. Smith,et al.  Statistical analysis of finite mixture distributions , 1986 .

[9]  K. Land,et al.  AGE, CRIMINAL CAREERS, AND POPULATION HETEROGENEITY: SPECIFICATION AND ESTIMATION OF A NONPARAMETRIC, MIXED POISSON MODEL* , 1993 .

[10]  T. Moffitt Adolescence-limited and life-course-persistent antisocial behavior: a developmental taxonomy. , 1993, Psychological review.

[11]  Robert J. Sampson,et al.  Crime in the Making: Pathways and Turning Points Through Life. , 1994 .

[12]  D. Nagin,et al.  Trajectories of boys' physical aggression, opposition, and hyperactivity on the path to physically violent and nonviolent juvenile delinquency. , 1999, Child development.

[13]  Wasserman,et al.  Bayesian Model Selection and Model Averaging. , 2000, Journal of mathematical psychology.

[14]  Gérard Govaert,et al.  Assessing a Mixture Model for Clustering with the Integrated Completed Likelihood , 2000, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[15]  Geoffrey J. McLachlan,et al.  Finite Mixture Models , 2019, Annual Review of Statistics and Its Application.

[16]  K. Roeder,et al.  A SAS Procedure Based on Mixture Models for Estimating Developmental Trajectories , 2001 .

[17]  D S Nagin,et al.  Analyzing developmental trajectories of distinct but related behaviors: a group-based method. , 2001, Psychological methods.

[18]  A. Pickles,et al.  Natural categories or fundamental dimensions: On carving nature at the joints and the rearticulation of psychopathology , 2003, Development and Psychopathology.

[19]  G. Vaillant,et al.  Shared Beginnings, Divergent Lives: Delinquent Boys , 2005 .

[20]  D. Nagin Group-based modeling of development , 2005 .

[21]  Daniel S. Nagin,et al.  Advances in Group-Based Trajectory Modeling and an SAS Procedure for Estimating Them , 2007 .

[22]  D. Nagin,et al.  Procedure for Estimating Them Advances in Group-Based Trajectory Modeling and an SAS , 2007 .