University patenting and its effects on academic research: The emerging European evidence

[1]  Francis Narin,et al.  Bibliometric analysis of U.S. pharmaceutical industry research performance , 1988 .

[2]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  Innovation and Learning: The Two Faces of R&D , 1989 .

[3]  L. Zucker,et al.  Star scientists and institutional transformation: patterns of invention and innovation in the formation of the biotechnology industry. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[4]  Paul Rabinow,et al.  Making PCR: A Story of Biotechnology , 1997 .

[5]  D Blumenthal,et al.  Participation of life-science faculty in research relationships with industry. , 1996, The New England journal of medicine.

[6]  D. E. Stokes.  Pasteur's Quadrant: Basic Science and Technological Innovation , 1997 .

[7]  J. Wallmark,et al.  Inventions and patents at universities: the case of Chalmers University of Technology , 1997 .

[8]  Melissa S. Anderson,et al.  Withholding research results in academic life science. Evidence from a national survey of faculty. , 1997, JAMA.

[9]  Henry Etzkowitz,et al.  Universities and the global knowledge economy , 1997 .

[10]  Lita Nelsen.  The Rise of Intellectual Property Protection in The American University , 1998, Science.

[11]  J. Liebeskind,et al.  Privatizing the Intellectual Commons: Universities and the Commercialization of Biotechnology , 1998 .

[12]  David Blumenthal,et al.  Data withholding in academic medicine: characteristics of faculty denied access to research results and biomaterials , 2000 .

[13]  D. Harhoff,et al.  Technology policy for a world of skew-distributed outcomes , 2000 .

[14]  Michael Reinhard,et al.  Wissens- und Technologietransfer in Deutschland - , 2001 .

[15]  Marie C. Thursby,et al.  Objectives, Characteristics and Outcomes of University Licensing: A Survey of Major U.S. Universities , 2001 .

[16]  Richard R. Nelson,et al.  Observations on the Post-Bayh-Dole Rise of Patenting at American Universities , 2001 .

[17]  David Blumenthal,et al.  Entrepreneurship, Secrecy, and Productivity: A Comparison of Clinical and Non-Clinical Life Sciences Faculty , 2001 .

[18]  W. Powell,et al.  To Patent or Not: Faculty Decisions and Institutional Success at Technology Transfer , 2001 .

[19]  Kimberly S. Hamilton,et al.  The changing composition of innovative activity in the US -- a portrait based on patent analysis , 2001 .

[20]  Canadian university publishes new rules to protect scientists , 2001, The Lancet.

[21]  Aldo Geuna,et al.  The Changing Rationale for European University Research Funding: Are There Negative Unintended Consequences? , 2001 .

[22]  Arvids A. Ziedonis,et al.  The growth of patenting and licensing by U.S. universities: an assessment of the effects of the Bayh–Dole act of 1980 , 2001 .

[23]  David C. Mowery,et al.  University Patents and Patent Policy Debates in the USA, 1925–1980 , 2001 .

[24]  Paula E. Stephan.  Educational Implications of University–Industry Technology Transfer , 2001 .

[25]  Joanna Poyago-Theotoky,et al.  Universities and Fundamental Research: Reflections on the Growth of University–Industry Partnerships , 2002 .

[26]  Scientists parlay youth into top French jobs , 2002 .

[27]  The impact of the new Grace Period under Australian patent law on universities , 2002 .

[28]  Arvids A. Ziedonis,et al.  Academic patent quality and quantity before and after the Bayh-Dole act in the United States , 2002 .

[29]  S. Hilgartner,et al.  Data withholding in academic genetics: evidence from a national survey. , 2002, JAMA.

[30]  David C. Mowery,et al.  Learning to Patent: Institutional Experience, Learning, and the Characteristics of U.S. University Patents After the Bayh-Dole Act, 1981-1992 , 2002 .

[31]  Andrea Piccaluga,et al.  Patenting Activity of European Universities. Relevant? Growing? Useful? , 2002 .

[32]  Bruno van Pottelsberghe de la Potterie,et al.  What Patent Data Reveal about Universities: The Case of Belgium , 2003 .

[33]  Martin Meyer,et al.  Academic patents as an indicator of useful research? A new approach to measure academic inventiveness , 2003 .

[34]  Helen Lawton Smith.  Knowledge Organizations and Local Economic Development: The Cases of Oxford and Grenoble , 2003 .

[35]  Stefano Brusoni,et al.  An international comparison of sectoral knowledge bases: persistence and integration in the pharmaceutical industry , 2003 .

[36]  P. Llerena.  Types of contractual funding and university patents: from analysis to a case study , 2003 .

[37]  Patrick Llerena,et al.  The Evolution of French Research Policies and the Impacts on the Universities and Public Research Organizations , 2003 .

[38]  Ammon Salter,et al.  Science and Innovation: Rethinking the Rationales for Funding and Governance , 2003 .

[39]  H. Smith,et al.  Knowledge Organizations and Local Economic Development: The Cases of Oxford and Grenoble , 2003 .

[40]  Richard A. Jensen,et al.  Patent Licensing and the Research University , 2004 .

[41]  S. Breschi,et al.  Networks of inventors and the role of academia: an exploration of Italian patent data , 2004 .

[42]  Magnus Gulbrandsen,et al.  Industry funding and university professors' research performance , 2005 .

[43]  Gustavo Crespi,et al.  Labour Mobility of Academic Inventors: Career Decision and Knowledge Transfer , 2006 .