Reliability, validity, and sensitivity of Japanese version of the UCLA Scleroderma Clinical Trial Consortium Gastrointestinal Tract Instrument: application to efficacy assessment of intravenous immunoglobulin administration.

Objective This study aimed to develop and assess the reliability, validity, and sensitivity of Japanese version of the University of California Los Angeles Scleroderma Clinical Trial Consortium Gastrointestinal Tract (GIT) Instrument 2.0 (the GIT score), as an evaluation tool for GIT symptoms in systemic sclerosis (SSc). Methods Japanese version of the GIT score was constructed using the forward-backward method. The reliability and validity of this instrument were evaluated in a cohort of 38 SSc patients. Correlation analysis was conducted to assess the relationship between the GIT score and existing patient-reported outcome measures. Additionally, the sensitivity of the GIT score was examined by comparing GIT scores before and after intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) administration in 10 SSc-myositis overlap patients, as IVIG has recently demonstrated effectiveness in alleviating GIT symptoms of SSc. Results Japanese version of the GIT score exhibited internal consistency and a significant association with the Frequency Scale for the Symptoms of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease. Furthermore, the total GIT score, as well as the reflux and distention/bloating subscales, displayed moderate correlations with the EQ-5D pain/discomfort subscale, Short Form-36 body pain subscale, and its physical component summary. Notably, following IVIG treatment, there was a statistically significant reduction in the total GIT score and most of the subscales. Conclusion We firstly validated Japanese version of the GIT score in Japanese SSc patients in real-world clinical settings. This instrument holds promise for application in future clinical trials involving this patient population.

[1]  N. Goshima,et al.  Comprehensive autoantibody profiling in systemic autoimmunity by a highly-sensitive multiplex protein array , 2023, Frontiers in immunology.

[2]  A. Yoshizaki,et al.  Rapid improvement of systemic sclerosis-associated intestinal pseudo-obstruction with intravenous immunoglobulin administration , 2023, Rheumatology.

[3]  K. Yamaguchi,et al.  Autoantibody Landscape Revealed by Wet Protein Array: Sum of Autoantibody Levels Reflects Disease Status , 2022, Frontiers in Immunology.

[4]  M. Ikawa,et al.  Identification and characterization of the antigen recognized by the germ cell mAb TRA98 using a human comprehensive wet protein array , 2021, Genes to cells : devoted to molecular & cellular mechanisms.

[5]  Y. Hong,et al.  Evaluation of risk factors for pseudo-obstruction in systemic sclerosis. , 2019, Seminars in arthritis and rheumatism.

[6]  Shinichi Sato,et al.  Skin thickness score as a surrogate marker of organ involvements in systemic sclerosis: a retrospective observational study , 2019, Arthritis Research & Therapy.

[7]  L. Saketkoo,et al.  Haematopoietic stem cell transplantation in systemic sclerosis , 2018, RMD Open.

[8]  Y. Kawaguchi Contribution of Interleukin-6 to the Pathogenesis of Systemic Sclerosis , 2017 .

[9]  J. Thumboo,et al.  Validation of the UCLA Scleroderma Clinical Trial Consortium Gastrointestinal Tract Instrument 2.0 in English- and Chinese-speaking patients in a multi-ethnic Singapore systemic sclerosis cohort , 2017, Clinical Rheumatology.

[10]  Takashi Fukuda,et al.  Developing a Japanese version of the EQ-5D-5L value set , 2015 .

[11]  G. Murdaca,et al.  Potential use of TNF-α inhibitors in systemic sclerosis. , 2014, Immunotherapy.

[12]  Oliver Distler,et al.  2013 classification criteria for systemic sclerosis: an American College of Rheumatology/European League against Rheumatism collaborative initiative. , 2013, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[13]  M. Omair,et al.  Effect of Gastrointestinal Manifestations on Quality of Life in 87 Consecutive Patients with Systemic Sclerosis , 2012, The Journal of Rheumatology.

[14]  D. Khanna,et al.  Development and validation of French version of the UCLA Scleroderma Clinical Trial Consortium Gastrointestinal Tract Instrument. , 2011, Clinical and experimental rheumatology.

[15]  P. Lachenbruch,et al.  Skin score. A semiquantitative measure of cutaneous involvement that improves prediction of prognosis in systemic sclerosis. , 2010, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[16]  R. Hays,et al.  Reliability and validity of the University of California, Los Angeles Scleroderma Clinical Trial Consortium Gastrointestinal Tract Instrument. , 2009, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[17]  Hiroko Yamada,et al.  Human protein factory for converting the transcriptome into an in vitro–expressed proteome , 2008, Nature Methods.

[18]  R. Hays,et al.  Development of a preliminary scleroderma gastrointestinal tract 1.0 quality of life instrument. , 2007, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[19]  Shin-Seok Lee,et al.  Elevated vascular endothelial growth factor in systemic sclerosis. , 2003, The Journal of rheumatology.

[20]  Tomio Ogasawara,et al.  A cell-free protein synthesis system for high-throughput proteomics , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[21]  J E Ware,et al.  Psychometric and clinical tests of validity of the Japanese SF-36 Health Survey. , 1998, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[22]  S. Fukuhara,et al.  Translation, adaptation, and validation of the SF-36 Health Survey for use in Japan. , 1998, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[23]  T. Medsger,et al.  Scleroderma (systemic sclerosis): classification, subsets and pathogenesis. , 1988, The Journal of rheumatology.

[24]  N Rowell,et al.  Systemic sclerosis. , 1968, British medical journal.

[25]  Ellen Johnson Cronbach’s Alpha , 2020, Encyclopedia of Autism Spectrum Disorders.