The preconditions for successful evaluation: Is there an ideal paradigm?

The dominant paradigm in evaluation research is undergoing serious challenge. This article explores the ideal role of evaluation in decisionmaking, the methodologies for conducting evaluations, the congruence between evaluation methodology and actual organizational behavior, and the relationship between evaluators and program managers. We conclude that although there are serious disparities between the ideal and the actual in each of these four areas, and especially in the congruence between evaluation methodology and organizational behavior, there is not likely to be a change in the dominant paradigm because it is difficult for practitioners to use the language and values of new organizational perspectives.

[1]  W. Whyte.  Social Inventions for Solving Human Problems , 1982 .

[2]  Richard I. Hofferbert.  DIFFERENTIAL PROGRAM IMPACT AS A FUNCTION OF TARGET NEED: OR WHY SOME GOOD POLICIES OFTEN SEEM TO FAIL , 1982 .

[3]  Peter deLeon,et al.  POLICY EVALUATION AND PROGRAM TERMINATION , 1983 .

[4]  L. Cronbach,et al.  Toward Reform of Program Evaluation , 1981 .

[5]  D. Campbell.  Reforms as experiments , 1969 .

[6]  Randall B. Ripley,et al.  Bureaucracy and Policy Implementation , 1983 .

[7]  J. Coleman.  Policy research in the social sciences , 1972 .

[8]  P. Blau.  The Dynamics Of Bureaucracy , 1955 .

[9]  William R. Shadish,et al.  Evaluation studies : review annual , 1976 .

[10]  Andrew Dunsire.  Implementation in a bureaucracy , 1978 .

[11]  D. Stufflebeam,et al.  An Analysis of Alternative Approaches to Evaluation , 1980 .

[12]  Michael Quinn Patton,et al.  Utilization-Focused Evaluation , 1979 .

[13]  J E Brandl.  Evaluation and politics. , 1978, Evaluation.

[14]  Michael X Cohen,et al.  A Garbage Can Model of Organizational Choice. , 1972 .

[15]  From Orthodoxy to Pluralism: New Views of School Administration. , 1982 .

[16]  M. Patton,et al.  Qualitative evaluation methods , 1981 .

[17]  Robert E. Stake,et al.  Program Evaluation, Particularly Responsive Evaluation , 1983 .

[18]  E. House.  Evaluating with Validity , 1980 .

[19]  Claire L. Felbinger,et al.  UTILIZATION IN THE POLICY CYCLE: DIRECTIONS FOR RESEARCH* , 1982 .

[20]  K. Weick.  Educational organizations as loosely coupled systems , 1976, Gestión y Estrategia.