Successful external cephalic version is an independent factor for caesarean section during trial of labor - a matched controlled study.

[1]  A. Bourtembourg,et al.  Impact de la version par manœuvre externe sur le pronostic obstétrical dans une équipe à fort taux de réussite de l’accouchement vaginal du siège , 2016 .

[2]  B. Mol,et al.  Risk factors for cesarean section and instrumental vaginal delivery after successful external cephalic version , 2016, The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine : the official journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, the International Society of Perinatal Obstetricians.

[3]  C. Flatley,et al.  Intrapartum intervention rates and perinatal outcomes following successful external cephalic version , 2016, Journal of Perinatology.

[4]  A. Haileamlak,et al.  The risks of planned vaginal breech delivery versus planned caesarean section for term breech birth: a meta‐analysis including observational studies , 2016, BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[5]  J. Thornton.  The Term Breech Trial results are generalisable , 2016, BJOG: an International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology.

[6]  G. Hofmeyr,et al.  External cephalic version for breech presentation at term. , 2015, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[7]  J. Hemelaar,et al.  The Impact of an ECV Service is Limited by Antenatal Breech Detection: A Retrospective Cohort Study. , 2015, Birth.

[8]  Y. Ezra,et al.  Induction of labor at term following external cephalic version in nulliparous women is associated with an increased risk of cesarean delivery , 2015, Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics.

[9]  N. Melamed,et al.  Predictors of successful external cephalic version and assessment of success for vaginal delivery , 2015, The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine : the official journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, the International Society of Perinatal Obstetricians.

[10]  G. Theron,et al.  Obstetric outcome after successful external cephalic version for breech presentation at term , 2014, International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics.

[11]  B. Mol,et al.  Mode of Delivery After Successful External Cephalic Version: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis , 2014, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[12]  H. Sameshima,et al.  Independent uterine contractions in simultaneous twin pregnancy in each horn of the uterus didelphys , 2014, The journal of obstetrics and gynaecology research.

[13]  V. Pop,et al.  Mode of delivery following successful external cephalic version: comparison with spontaneous cephalic presentations at delivery. , 2013, Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology Canada : JOGC = Journal d'obstetrique et gynecologie du Canada : JOGC.

[14]  Y. Ezra,et al.  Timing of Delivery After External Cephalic Version and the Risk for Cesarean Delivery , 2011, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[15]  Y. Cheong,et al.  Labour outcome of women with successful external cephalic version: A prospective study , 2010, Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology : the journal of the Institute of Obstetrics and Gynaecology.

[16]  J. Chung,et al.  Cesarean risk after successful external cephalic version: a matched, retrospective analysis , 2009, Journal of Perinatology.

[17]  B. Mol,et al.  External Cephalic Version–Related Risks: A Meta-analysis , 2008, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[18]  M. Wise,et al.  Successful but limited use of external cephalic version in Auckland , 2008, The Australian & New Zealand journal of obstetrics & gynaecology.

[19]  L. Chan,et al.  Prediction of intrapartum Cesarean delivery for non‐reassuring fetal status after a successful external cephalic version by a low pre‐version pulsatility index of the fetal middle cerebral artery , 2006, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[20]  J. L. Tang,et al.  Intrapartum Cesarean Delivery After Successful External Cephalic Version: A Meta-Analysis , 2004, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[21]  M. Boucher,et al.  Cesarean delivery after successful external cephalic version of breech presentation at term: a comparative study. , 2004, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[22]  M. Hod,et al.  Mode of Delivery Following Successful External Cephalic Version , 2002, American journal of perinatology.

[23]  Andrew R Willan,et al.  Planned caesarean section versus planned vaginal birth for breech presentation at term: a randomised multicentre trial , 2000, The Lancet.

[24]  T. Lao,et al.  Predicting the success of external cephalic version with a scoring system. A prospective, two-phase study. , 2000, The Journal of reproductive medicine.

[25]  D. Sahota,et al.  A comparison of fetal behaviour in breech and cephalic presentations at term , 1999, British journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[26]  W. Cohen,et al.  Labor and delivery in nulliparous women who present with an unengaged fetal head. , 1998, Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association.

[27]  L. Specht,et al.  Increase in fetal breech presentation in female carriers of Duchenne muscular dystrophy. , 1997, American journal of medical genetics.

[28]  T. Lau,et al.  Pregnancy outcome after successful external cephalic version for breech presentation at term. , 1997, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[29]  C. Schauberger,et al.  Dysfunctional Labor After External Cephalic Version , 1994, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[30]  J. P. Vandorsten,et al.  Predicting success of external cephalic version. , 1993, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[31]  J. Daling,et al.  The frequency of breech presentation by gestational age at birth: a large population-based study. , 1992, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.