Boundary-Layer Transition on X-43A

The successful Mach 7 and 10 flights of the first fully integrated scramjet propulsion systems by the Hyper-X (X-43A) program have provided the means with which to verify the original design methodologies and assumptions. As part of Hyper-X's propulsion-airframe integration, the forebody was designed to include a spanwise array of vortex generators to promote boundary layer transition ahead of the engine. Turbulence at the inlet is thought to provide the most reliable engine design and allows direct scaling of flight results to ground- based data. Pre-flight estimations of boundary layer transition, for both Mach 7 and 10 flight conditions, suggested that forebody boundary layer trips were required to ensure fully turbulent conditions upstream of the inlet. This paper presents the results of an analysis of the thermocouple measurements used to infer the dynamics of the transition process during the trajectories for both flights, on both the lower surface (to assess trip performance) and the upper surface (to assess natural transition). The approach used in the analysis of the thermocouple data is outlined, along with a discussion of the calculated local flow properties that correspond to the transition events as identified in the flight data. The present analysis has confirmed that the boundary layer trips performed as expected for both flights, providing turbulent flow ahead of the inlet during critical portions of the trajectory, while the upper surface was laminar as predicted by the pre-flight analysis.

[1]  Steven B. Smith,et al.  Digital Signal Processing: A Practical Guide for Engineers and Scientists , 2002 .

[2]  Ernst R. Eckert SURVEY OF BOUNDARY LAYER HEAT TRANSFER AT HIGH VELOCITIES AND HIGH TEMPERATURES , 1960 .

[3]  Scott A. Berry,et al.  Hypersonic Boundary-Layer Trip Development for Hyper-X , 2000 .

[4]  Eli Reshotko,et al.  BOUNDARY LAYER STABILITY AND TRANSITION , 1976 .

[5]  W. Pitts,et al.  Reusable surface insulations for reentry spacecraft , 1991 .

[6]  E. Clay Anderson,et al.  Laminar or turbulent boundary-layer flows of perfect gases or reacting gas mixtures in chemical equilibrium , 1971 .

[7]  Walter C. Engelund,et al.  Hyper-X Wind Tunnel Program , 1998 .

[8]  Kathryn E. Wurster,et al.  Engineering Aerothermal Analysis for X-34 Thermal Protection System Design , 1999 .

[9]  L Braak Reaping rewards from space life sciences. , 1997, Aerospace America.

[10]  Roger A. Lepsch,et al.  Multidisciplinary Analysis of a Lifting Body Launch Vehicle , 2002 .

[11]  S. C. Praharaj,et al.  MINIVER upgrade for the AVID system. Volume 1: LANMIN user's manual , 1983 .

[12]  Charles R. Mcclinton,et al.  Hyper-X: Flight Validation of Hypersonic Airbreathing Technology , 1997 .

[13]  I. Tani,et al.  Boundary-Layer Transition , 1969 .

[14]  Kei Y. Lau Hypersonic Boundary-Layer Transition: Application to High-Speed Vehicle Design , 2008 .

[15]  H. W. Stone,et al.  Aerodynamic heating environment definition/thermal protection system selection for the HL-20 , 1993 .

[16]  Scott A. Berry,et al.  Finite Volume Numerical Methods for Aeroheating Rate Calculations from Infrared Thermographic Data , 2006 .

[17]  Stanley A. Bouslog,et al.  Emittance measurements of RCG coated Shuttle tiles , 1992 .